• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

There is no corruption in Singapore...

People's Association files police report over possible irregularities flagged by AGO​

The possible irregularities are related to the People's Association's management of Our Tampines Hub and Heartbeat@Bedok.


The possible irregularities are related to the People's Association's management of Our Tampines Hub and Heartbeat@Bedok.

PHOTOS: LIANHE ZAOBAO, ST FILE
rei_kurohi.png

Rei Kurohi

JUL 22, 2021

SINGAPORE - The Auditor-General's Office (AGO) has flagged several lapses and possible irregularities related to the People's Association's (PA's) management of two large development projects, Our Tampines Hub (OTH) and Heartbeat @ Bedok (HBB).
In a statement on Thursday (July 22), the PA said it has taken immediate steps to review the management of contracts at both developments, address the lapses identified and initiate rectification of any over- or underpayments. It also made a police report over the irregularities observed at OTH, including possible falsification of documents.
The PA had engaged contractors to carry out minor building works at OTH and a managing agent to manage the facilities and supervise the contractors.
The AGO checked a sample of payments totalling $1.27 million made between April 2018 and March 2020 and found possible irregularities in the supporting documents for 34 of the 36 payments.
The irregularities included possible falsification of quotations, alteration of hard-copy payment supporting documents and the creation and backdating of documents to give the false impression that proper processes had been followed.
"As the lapses relate to serious allegations involving falsification of documents, including in relation to claims by external parties, PA has lodged a police report and investigations are ongoing," the PA said, adding that it had suspended the staff involved pending the outcome of the investigation.

The PA also said it would set up a task force led by senior officers to strengthen processes in procurement, contract and facility management, raise staff capabilities, and improve oversight of contractors and managing agents.
It will also appoint an external consultant to conduct a thorough review of its governance system and oversight functions related to contract management of all development projects, the PA added.
The external consultant will be given a "broad mandate" to review such matters and provide recommendations to strengthen PA's oversight of contract management.
Other issues flagged by the AGO include lapses in the computation of adjustments for price fluctuations for the main construction contract at OTH and weaknesses in the management and oversight of contract variations for the main construction contracts for both OTH and HBB.

This means PA could have overpaid its contractors by an estimated $2 million for building materials for OTH, such as concrete and steel reinforcements.
The AGO also checked 465 contract variations amounting to $26.48 million and found lapses in 252 or 54.2 per cent of them. Contract variations are mutually agreed changes to the terms of contracts that are already in effect.
No evidence of approval was found for 109 contract variations, while approvals for 142 of them were obtained only one month to 5½ years after works had commenced or were already completed. There were also other issues such as the use of incorrect rates, resulting in over- and underpayments.
The PA said it would work with consultants to determine the amount of over- or underpayments and take the appropriate steps.

The AGO also noted that two critical tender requirements were not explicitly incorporated into tenancy agreements at HBB.
For one such agreement related to the provision of childcare services, the PA had stipulated a cap on full-day childcare fees in the first two years of operation, from August 2017 to August 2019, in order to provide residents in the vicinity of the HBB with lower fees.
But the PA failed to ensure this requirement was made explicit in the tenancy agreement. This resulted in the tenant charging fees that were 23 per cent higher than the cap specified for the first two years of its operation.
The PA said this was a "unique arrangement" and the condition was not part of its standard tenancy agreement template for development projects.
It added that the tenant had agreed to refund the difference to affected parents by the end of July.
Another tender requirement related to adjustments in rent and service and conservancy charges due to a revision of tenanted floor area. This resulted in tenants being charged incorrect amounts.
The PA said it has since made the appropriate adjustments and refunded affected tenants.
 

Auditor-General's Office report: Overpayments, altered records among some lapses found​

The Auditor-General's Office highlighted key lapses by various ministries and public agencies.


The Auditor-General's Office highlighted key lapses by various ministries and public agencies.PHOTO: ST FILE
rei_kurohi.png

Rei Kurohi

JUL 23, 2021


SINGAPORE - The Auditor-General's Office (AGO) released its report on Thursday (July 22) highlighting key lapses by various ministries and public agencies.
Here is a summary of its findings.

Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth (MCCY)​

The AGO found that some records could have been photocopies with alterations made to the dates and duration of services rendered while others had pre-printed signatures or showed other signs of weak controls.
Six attendance records were fabricated specifically to meet the AGO's request for missing records.
The MCCY said it took immediate steps to address the issues, including recovering all overpayments.
It also took disciplinary action against the two officers who had fabricated the documents.

Ministry of Defence (Mindef)​


Mindef overpaid 323 bills totalling $84,300 to a national healthcare institution between September 2019 and March 2021.
The healthcare institution had incorrectly billed Mindef at the private non-subsidised rate instead of the government-subsidised rate.
Mindef said the error occurred because staff at the healthcare institution had wrongly removed the government subsidy for two tests during a fee review in 2019.
It added that it would complete recovery of overpayment by July and implement checks to scrutinise bills that do not include government subsidies before making payment.

Ministry of Education (MOE) and Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA)​

The AGO noted that improvements were needed in MOE's and MHA's management of facility management contracts.
It also found instances of supporting documents that were created or backdated to satisfy AGO's queries at both ministries.
AGO also noted weaknesses in MHA's integrated logistics management system.
Both ministries said they would improve their facilities management processes. They also made police reports on the possible fabrication or falsification of records.

MORE ON THIS TOPIC​

AGO finds heritage items improperly deleted from NHB records, tender bids not evaluated

People's Association files police report over possible irregularities flagged by AGO

National Library Board (NLB)​

The AGO found various lapses in NLB's procurement of a digital film projection system worth $4.75 million. There was inadequate assurance that principles of value for money, fairness and transparency had been adhered to, AGO said.
NLB said it would remind its staff of its internal guidelines and maintain proper documentation of various tender processes in future.

Singapore Polytechnic (SP)​

SP did not put up required reports to the central government authority concerning two tenderers who had withdrawn their bids after the close of tenders, but before the tenders were awarded.
This is a serious matter and is ground for debarment from being awarded government tenders for a period of time, said the AGO.
SP said it has since informed the Standing Committee on Debarment of the cases and would review its processes to ensure future compliance.

Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (Acra)​

The AGO flagged weak controls over the operating system (OS) user accounts with the highest system access privileges in Acra's online filing and information retrieval system, BizFile+.
Acra said it has since modified the configurations of its security software and started logging all commands executed by administrators with root privileges, or full access to the OS.

Health Promotion Board (HPB)​

About 341,000 fitness trackers not put to use for the HPB's National Steps Challenge resulted in $5.39 million of public funds being wasted.
Some of the units had become mouldy and the warranties for all the excess trackers will expire at the end of the year.
HPB said it had overestimated the demand for trackers and pre-emptively topped up its stock each season based on the observed interest from the public.
"For future seasons of the National Steps Challenge, HPB will be more conservative in our projections."

Health Sciences Authority (HSA)​

HSA's total expenditure on small value purchases between April 2018 and June 2020 was substantial at $8.02 million.
AGO found that HSA had been buying required items like chemicals, laboratory devices and consumables on an ad hoc basis instead of aggregating its requirements and purchasing them through tenders.
There were also lapses in outsourced IT contracts and IT application controls.
HSA said it would step up its use of data analytics to identify frequent small value purchases that should be aggregated. It also said it had reviewed its IT systems.

MORE ON THIS TOPIC​

AGO finds wastage of $5.39m of public funds at HPB over excess fitness trackers

Lapses found in govt financial records: MOF says there's no tolerance for fraud, corruption

Housing Board (HDB)​

Housing grants totalling $405,000 were disbursed to ineligible applicants.
The AGO also found that quotations for some items could have been created or altered to give the impression that they were obtained from other suppliers.
HDB said it would improve its controls and recover the wrongly disbursed grants. It added that it will take action against applicants who had suppressed any relevant information.

Land Transport Authority (LTA)​

The AGO found 36 instances where LTA had delayed refunding advance payments to individuals or companies that requested works such as shifting of streetlights or bus shelters.
The delays ranged from 11 months to 12.6 years after the works had been completed.
Following the audit, LTA refunded all the cases in March. The highest refund amount was $232,000, and 12 cases involved refunds of more than $50,000.
LTA said it would tighten its monitoring controls and carry out quarterly reviews of advance payment accounts.

Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA)​

Following a complaint, the AGO conducted checks on a $430,000 tender for event and venue management services for a 2018 MPA event and found several lapses, including significant errors in the tender evaluation report.
The MPA officer in charge had also engaged in detailed discussions with the tenderer that was later awarded the contract before the Tender Approving Authority had made a decision.
Some changes made to the event were also not reflected in the report.
MPA acknowledged the lapses and said it has appointed a panel to investigate the tender and past similar tenders handled by the same team.
 

MCCY officers issued warnings, PA staff suspended for document irregularities uncovered by AGO​

Second Minister for Finance Indranee Rajah said more central IT infrastructure and common services are being deployed to improve processes and officers' capabilities.


Second Minister for Finance Indranee Rajah said more central IT infrastructure and common services are being deployed to improve processes and officers' capabilities.PHOTO: MCI
graceho.png

Grace Ho
Senior Political Correspondent

SEP 13, 2021


SINGAPORE - Two Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth (MCCY) officers were issued official warnings and their performance assessments affected after they admitted to fabricating claims records.
In separate cases, People's Association (PA) staff who may have falsified quotations and doctored documents were suspended from duties.
Irregularities in contractors' records provided to the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) led to one contractor being charged in court and the other given a 12-month conditional warning. Two officers are also undergoing internal investigations for a lack of due diligence, said Second Minister for Finance Indranee Rajah on Monday (Sept 13).
She added that investigations are ongoing at two other agencies - the Ministry of Education (MOE) and Housing Board (HDB).
Ms Indranee was responding to questions by Workers' Party chief Pritam Singh and Mr Yip Hon Weng (Yio Chu Kang) on recurring lapses uncovered by the Auditor-General's Office (AGO).
The five agencies were flagged by AGO for irregularities and possible falsification of documents, in its July report on government accounts for the 2020/2021 financial year,


The AGO had noted that some supporting documents for claims in MCCY appeared to have been photocopies, with alterations made to the dates and duration of services rendered.
At MOE and MHA, there were instances of supporting documents possibly created or even backdated to satisfy queries.
For the HDB, quotations for some items could have been created or altered to give the impression that they were obtained from other suppliers. At the PA, possible irregularities suggested falsification of quotations, alteration of hard-copy payment supporting details and the creation and backdating of documents.
Ms Indranee said two MCCY officers have admitted to fabricating claims records for services rendered by external parties.

The officers could not locate the records when requested by the AGO. But the investigation showed that the claims were valid, and services were in fact rendered.
"While the claims were real, the conduct of the officers in fabricating the claims records was wrong," she explained.
MHA had three cases of possible irregularities in records furnished by contractors. One contractor was charged in court and the other was given a 12-month conditional warning.
In the third case, action was taken against the contractor for not complying with contractual requirements.
"There was no fabrication of records by public officers in any of these three cases. However, two officers are undergoing internal investigations for the lack of due diligence," she said.
She added that human errors and process gaps will happen from time to time, given that there are 150,000 officers in the public service handling hundreds of thousands of transactions each year, and more than 2,000 government information technology systems built over the years by different vendors and using different technologies.
MCCY officers given warnings, PA staff suspended for document irregularities | THE BIG STORY

Recurring lapses have typically been in the areas of procurement and contracts management, IT controls and grants management. These share common factors like the scale and complexity of operations, a constantly changing operating environment, high volume of transactions and multiple touch points.
What is important is having the means to pick up such lapses and address them in an upfront and transparent manner, said Ms Indranee.
To improve processes and officers' capabilities, she said more central IT infrastructure and common services are being deployed, which facilitate regular reviews at the whole-of-government level.
The Smart Nation and Digital Government Group is also implementing central tools to automate agencies' review of privileged users' activities and management of user accounts, she added.

The former will be implemented for some 800 high-priority systems by December next year and all applicable systems by December 2023, while the latter will be implemented for all applicable systems by December 2023.
Agencies regularly review and strengthen their own processes and systems to mitigate agency-level risks, she added.
The Ministry of Finance has established the Finance and Procurement Academy in partnership with the Civil Service College to better equip public officers with relevant competencies.
Officers involved in finance, procurement and contract management receive refreshers and updates on policies and practices.
"We will step up our efforts as the recent audit findings pertain to more complex types of procurement and contract management, particularly in the areas of IT and development projects," she said, adding that officers involved in IT roles are actively engaged in audit findings, as well as learning points and ways to prevent lapses.

Responding to Mr Singh's question on the "unusual" number of incidents of falsifying documents in this year's report, Ms Indranee said the key to resolving process problems is to pick them up as quickly and as efficiently as possible, by automating processes to minimise human error.
But it is also important to build people's capabilities, she added.
"(It means) impressing upon public officers the importance of doing this well...so that in fact they internalise it.
"(We) will continue to emphasise to the officers that misconduct is viewed seriously and will not be condoned, and will also remind them that there are internal avenues to report wrongdoing and fraudulent acts - if these occur, and if the reporting is made in good faith."
The heads of agencies will also prioritise and intensify internal audits to look out for any such wrongdoing and deal with them decisively, she said.
She stressed that integrity is a core value of the public service, and it will continue to uphold strict standards to ensure accountability in the use of public funds.
 

Internal review by People's Association uncovers further lapses following AGO report​

The People's Association is also doing a full review of remaining contract variations for Our Tampines Hub and Heartbeat@Bedok beyond those audited by the AGO.


The People's Association is also doing a full review of remaining contract variations for Our Tampines Hub and Heartbeat@Bedok beyond those audited by the AGO.

PHOTOS: LIANHE ZAOBAO, ST FILE
rei_kurohi.png

Rei Kurohi


SEP 13, 2021


SINGAPORE - The People's Association (PA) could have overpaid contractors by an estimated $60,000 for two construction projects, it found during an internal review.
This is on top of the estimated $2 million it may have overpaid for building materials for Our Tampines Hub (OTH), which the Auditor-General's Office (AGO) flagged in its annual audit of public agencies in Singapore.
Minister for Culture, Community and Youth Edwin Tong gave an update in Parliament on Monday (Sept 13) on remedial steps and internal investigations by PA following the AGO's findings on two large development projects that it manages - OTH and Heartbeat @ Bedok (HBB).
He told the House that the Government requires agencies to adopt full price fluctuation adjustment for developments with a contract value of more than $5 million. This refers to payment adjustments to account for the changing prices of key raw materials like concrete and steel reinforcement over the course of the project.
Responding to Leader of the Opposition Pritam Singh (Aljunied GRC), Mr Tong said PA reviewed 31 public construction developments after the AGO report, which revealed that two projects had erroneously adopted a 70 per cent cap on price fluctuation adjustments in the past seven years - similar to OTH's main construction contract. He did not name the two projects.
PA has since ensured that the provision in all such standard construction contracts is clear and fixed, he said, to ensure greater clarity and compliance on how price fluctuation adjustments should be made.


Mr Singh, Ms Foo Mee Har (West Coast GRC) and Mr Sitoh Yih Pin (Potong Pasir) also asked about lapses related to contract variations during the construction of OTH and HBB, as well as irregularities which arose during the operations and facilities maintenance phase at OTH.
Contract variations are mutually agreed changes to the terms of contracts that are already in effect.
Mr Tong also said PA has looked into all 252 cases of lapses related to contract variations for OTH flagged by the AGO, and is doing a full review of the remaining contract variations for both OTH and HBB beyond those audited by the AGO.
"PA is doing so to ensure that the other contract variations were carried out with appropriate approvals and proper documentation, and if not, then to take the appropriate remedial actions," he said.

Replying to Mr Singh, Mr Tong said PA will give an update once it completes its review.
On the irregularities in documents related to payments and lapses in managing contracts at OTH, Mr Tong said an internal investigation confirmed the AGO's findings.
A task force has been set up to strengthen existing processes and improve oversight of contractors and managing agents, he added.
MCCY officers given warnings, PA staff suspended for document irregularities | THE BIG STORY

Ms Foo said the lapses uncovered by the AGO were "disturbing", and asked if lapses in contract management are systemic across development projects for the 788 community facilities managed by PA.
"The lapses, as far as we can tell, were not systemic," Mr Tong replied.

PA has appointed an external consultant from Ernst & Young (EY) to examine its governance system and oversight functions, and will share the findings with the public when ready, he added.
The consultant will conduct an audit and business process review on PA's contract management of its development and facility management projects in recent years, examine the governance structure for similar integrated community complexes, and provide recommendations to strengthen the oversight of all development projects.
"The external consultant will have a broad mandate to review. It will make practical recommendations to rectify control weaknesses or any lapses noted, as well as identify areas of improvement in terms of efficiency, economy and effectiveness," said Mr Tong.
"PA will take in these recommendations, improve processes when needed and also implement better oversight."
 

Football: No charges against ex-FAS chief Zainudin Nordin, general secretary Winston Lee, over 2017 raids: AGC​

Zainudin Nordin (right) was FAS president from 2009 to 2017, while Winston Lee served as its general secretary for nine years and resigned in Dec 2017.


Zainudin Nordin (right) was FAS president from 2009 to 2017, while Winston Lee served as its general secretary for nine years and resigned in Dec 2017.
PHOTOS: ST FILE
saa2.png

Sazali Abdul Aziz
Correspondent

Sep 26, 2021

SINGAPORE - Former Football Association of Singapore (FAS) senior officials Zainudin Nordin and Winston Lee will face no charges as part of the years-long investigation into the alleged misuse of funds at local football clubs.
Former Member of Parliament Zainudin was FAS president from 2009 to 2017, while Lee served as its general secretary for nine years and resigned in December 2017.
In response to queries from The Straits Times, a spokesman for the Attorney General's Chambers (AGC) said: "AGC has recently directed the Commercial Affairs Department (CAD) to take no further action against Zainudin Bin Nordin and Winston Lee.
"AGC is still in consultation with the CAD to review the CAD's investigation findings against other individuals and is therefore unable to comment on the case at this juncture."
The AGC did not name the other individuals involved in the case but it was reported previously that Zainudin, Lee, Hougang United chairman Bill Ng and his wife Bonnie Wong had been arrested and questioned by the CAD.
ST has reached out to Zainudin and Lee for comment.

The AGC's statement is the first major development in the case, which rocked the local sports scene almost 4 ½ years ago, in April 2017.
Then, the FAS was in the midst of conducting the first election in its history. Previous FAS council members had been appointed by the government.
Ng had led a team called the Game Changers, who were up against a team led by then FAS vice-president Lim Kia Tong.
It was during the hustings that a stunning revelation was made by the Game Changers: Tiong Bahru Football Club - an amateur side also run by Ng - had made a $500,000 donation to the Asean Football Federation through the FAS.
The revelation led to a public verbal spat between Ng and Lee.
Ng said Lee was chiefly responsible for the donation, while Lee countered by claiming Ng was aware of the transaction and that Zainudin was involved.
The accusations prompted national agency Sport Singapore to make a police report against Tiong Bahru over the suspected misuse of club funds and a purported attempt by a senior officer of the club to obstruct the completion of audits into several clubs which were then not taking part in the professional S-League (since renamed the Singapore Premier League).
As part of investigations, CAD officers conducted raids at the FAS offices at the Jalan Besar Stadium and three clubs linked to Ng - Hougang, Tiong Bahru and sit-out club Woodlands Wellington - seizing documents and computers.
Lim went on to win the 2017 election.
In April 2021, three weeks before the FAS held its elections, Minister for Home Affairs K. Shanmugam gave an update in Parliament that the AGC was reviewing the CAD's investigation findings.
At the elections, Lim was returned unopposed for a second four-year term.

A timeline of the FAS saga​

March 2017​

The FAS announces an April 29 date for the elections, the first in its history.
It is reported that FAS general secretary Winston Lee is considering leaving the FAS following the elections.

April 14, 2017​

Hougang United chairman Bill Ng, leading a team called the Game Changers who are up against a team led by former FAS vice-president Lim Kia Tong, unveils his team's manifesto.
At the event, Ng claims he has donated about $850,000 to the FAS but is not sure how the money was spent.
He tells those present to "call Winston Lee" to find out what happened to the money.
The sum includes a $500,000 donation through amateur club Tiong Bahru, which Ng also runs. This raises eyebrows as the figure is double what the FAS spent on grassroots football the previous financial year.
Hours after Ng makes his claim, Lee explains that the $500,000 figure went toward a football management system for regional body the Asean Football Federation (AFF), and that Ng was fully aware of the transaction.

April 15, 2017​

FAS further explains that Zainudin had asked Ng to make the $500,000 donation to the AFF.
Lim says Zainudin never mentioned the donation in any FAS council meeting.

April 16, 2017​

National agency Sport Singapore (SportSG) steps in, saying it requires "the new council to provide a complete and satisfactory report on the management of these matters".

April 18, 2017​

FAS produces copies of a letter, cheques and payment vouchers, to prove that Ng knew about, and signed off on, the $500,000 donation.
Ng counters by saying he merely followed Lee's instructions and copied the contents of an e-mail from Lee onto the letterhead of Tiong Bahru.

April 20, 2017​

Police conduct raids at the FAS offices at the Jalan Besar Stadium and three clubs linked to Ng -Hougang, Tiong Bahru and sit-out club Woodlands Wellington.
This comes after SportSG makes a police report against Tiong Bahru over the suspected misuse of club funds and a purported attempt by a senior officer of the club to obstruct the completion of audits into several clubs which are not taking part in the S-League.
Commercial Affairs Department (CAD) officers seize documents and computers in the operation, which wraps up just after 2am.
It later emerges that Lee, Zainudin, Ng and his wife Bonnie Wong are arrested and questioned by the CAD.

April 22, 2017​

ST obtains documents which show that Tiong Bahru's clubhouse at People's Park Centre took in $36.8 million the previous year - an amount which eclipses the FAS' budget of $35.8 million for the same period.
The landlord of the clubhouse, which has 29 jackpot machines, is a company that lists Wong as the majority shareholder.
Other documents show links between Ng and Zainudin outside of football. For example, Zainudin was listed as a director of ESW Manage, a company on the portfolio of Financial Frontiers, a global equity firm Ng founded.

April 24, 2017​

ST reports that Lee, Zainudin, Ng and Wong are out on police bail.
The ad-hoc FAS electoral committee says that despite the arrests and police investigation, the polls will go ahead and only Fifa can step in to stop it.

April 29, 2017​

Lim is elected FAS president after his team wins the vote 30-13.
Ng takes a step toward reconciliation by congratulating the winning team and offers his backing for local football's new leaders, who will serve a four-year term.

May 2017​

All three football clubhouses raided by the CAD reopen for business, having suspended their operations since the April 20 operation.

July 2017​

The Ministry of Home Affairs announces tighter regulations on jackpot licences for sports clubs in an effort to reduce the number of machines over the next two years.
The new rules also target football clubs that have jackpot revenue but do not field a professional team.

December 2017​

Lee resigns as FAS general secretary. He had been with the organisation for 18 years, wearing multiple hats, including that of S-League chief executive officer.
Yazeen Buhari, the deputy general secretary of the FAS, takes over as acting general secretary. His role becomes permanent in September 2018.

MORE ON THIS TOPIC​

First group of School Football Academies could be ready by 2022, says FAS deputy president

Football: Former Singapore international K. Kannan appeals against lifetime ban

December 2018​

FAS nominates Lee for one of nine seats on the executive committee of Asian football body the Asian Football Confederation (AFC).
Members of the nine-strong FAS council are said to be upset that they had not been consulted on the nomination.
Hours before the AFC's congress in April 2019, Lee withdraws his candidacy.

April 2021​

Three weeks before the FAS holds its elections, Minister for Home Affairs K. Shanmugam says in Parliament that the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) is reviewing the CAD's investigation findings.
At the elections, Lim is returned unopposed for a second four-year term.

September 2021​

In response to queries from ST, the AGC says it has directed the CAD to take no further action against Lee and Zainudin.
It adds that it is still in consultation with the CAD to review their investigation findings against other individuals involved in the case.
 
Did Cheng Wenjuan die of natural causes?
Did she die from COVID-19 or from the vaccinations?
Did she commit suicide?
Was she silenced?

Woman accused of giving ICA officer sexual service as bribe dies; charges abated​

Cheng Wenjuan, who was accused of 18 counts of graft and two offences under the Women's Charter, died on Aug 27.


Cheng Wenjuan, who was accused of 18 counts of graft and two offences under the Women's Charter, died on Aug 27.PHOTO: ST FILE
shaffiq_alkhatib.png

Shaffiq Alkhatib
Court Correspondent

Sep 28, 2021

SINGAPORE - A woman accused of giving a sexual bribe to an Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA) officer has had her charges abated following her death last month.
Chinese national Cheng Wenjuan, 32, who was accused of 18 counts of graft and two offences under the Women's Charter, died on Aug 27.
The Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) told The Straits Times on Tuesday (Sept 28) that the prosecution had then applied to abate her charges.
The court granted the application on Sept 9. The AGC did not disclose details about her death.
Cheng made the headlines late last year after she allegedly gave ICA officer Teo Hwee Peng, 47, a free massage with a sexual act in July 2019 in exchange for arrangements he could make for her to be issued with a Special Pass to remain in Singapore.
A Special Pass, which legalises a foreigner's stay in Singapore, is issued for specific purposes, such as assistance in investigations and court attendance, and to stateless persons residing here.

Those holding Special Passes are not allowed to work without also having a valid work pass.
Cheng had also been accused of agreeing to give a bribe of $1,500 to Teo, who was working as a checkpoints inspector at the time.

eb-crime-092821.jpg
Cheng Wenjuan had been accused of corruptly providing Kelvin Lim Chee Wee (pictured) with sexual services on various occasions between May and July 2019. ST PHOTO: KELVIN CHNG

She was also alleged to have offered more bribes to him on two occasions in July 2019.

One was said to involve $500 while the other purportedly involved an unspecified sum.
The Chinese national had also been accused of 14 graft charges involving another man, Kelvin Lim Chee Wee, 43.
The two Singaporean men, Cheng, and a second Chinese national, Liang Qinglan, 37, were hauled to a district court on Nov 24 last year to face multiple graft charges.
Lim, Teo and Liang were each handed between nine and 14 charges.
Court documents state that both Liang and Cheng allegedly provided sexual services and bribes to Teo in return for the officer's help in getting Special Passes issued to them.
Between 2018 and 2019, Liang purportedly provided Teo sexual services, at least $2,100 in cash, a red packet containing 188.88 yuan ($39) and loans of about 7,000 yuan.

She also allegedly agreed to give him an Apple iPhone X.
In matters linked to Lim, Cheng had been accused of corruptly providing him with sexual services as well as $7,000 and 1,000 yuan in cash, on various occasions between May and July 2019.
She had allegedly done so in exchange for his help in getting a purported ICA officer to arrange for her to receive a Special Pass.
Cheng had also been accused of bribing Lim with about $2,000 and 3,000 yuan to have a purported ICA officer arrange for a Special Pass to be issued to another person.
In an earlier statement, the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) said that Lim had lied to Cheng, claiming that he used to work at ICA and had friends in the immigration department who could arrange for her to be issued with a Special Pass.
But he had never worked at ICA and was in fact a manager of a motor vehicle workshop at that time, said the CPIB.
The cases involving Lim, Teo and Liang are still pending.
For each count of corruption, an offender can be jailed for up to five years and fined up to $100,000.
 

Sembmarine apologises after Jurong dorm residents raise issues about hygiene, Covid-19 healthcare​

Residents and healthcare workers at Westlite Jalan Tukang Dormitory on Oct 14, 2021.


Residents and healthcare workers at Westlite Jalan Tukang Dormitory on Oct 14, 2021.

ST PHOTO: GAVIN FOO
Tay Hong Yi

OCT 15, 2021

SINGAPORE - Sembcorp Marine has apologised to its workers living at Westlite Jalan Tukang Dormitory over issues they have raised, and said it will continue to engage them on their concerns.
The marine and offshore engineering group acknowledged in a statement on Friday (Oct 15) that its workers at the Jurong dormitory had complained about poor hygiene and quality in their catered food, which was provided by an external caterer engaged by the firm.
"The company apologises to our workers for these issues."
The firm also said it has taken the caterer to task and has insisted that the provider strictly adheres to hygiene standards, as well as timeliness in its food delivery.
"(Sembcorp Marine) will continue to monitor this to ensure a high and consistent standard of food hygiene and quality."
Bad food was one of several complaints workers had at the 3,400-bed dormitory, which houses about 1,400 Sembcorp Marine workers.


Other complaints included long delays in transporting workers with Covid-19 to recovery and healthcare facilities amid a steep increase in positive cases detected during the company's mandatory routine testing exercise on its workers in the dorm.
"Arrangements were made to convey the workers. Unfortunately, due to the large numbers, there were delays in conveyance to recovery and healthcare facilities," said the company.
"This led to great unhappiness among both the Covid-positive workers as well as those who tested negative."
Sembcorp Marine said it worked with the Ministry of Manpower's Assurance, Care and Engagement (Ace) group and dormitory operator Westlite to "resolve the logistical challenge" of sending the workers to appropriate care or recovery facilities and address the concerns.

As at Thursday evening, all residents who tested positive have been sent to a care or recovery facility, said Sembcorp Marine.
The company said it will continue regular Covid-19 testing and coordinate closely with Ace and the dormitory operator in Covid-19 testing and management.
"(Sembcorp Marine) appreciates that Ace has been reviewing its processes to ensure that it is able to secure sufficient resources to manage unexpected increases in cases across all dormitories," it added.

The company has also stepped up its engagement of its workers at Tukang dormitory "given the heightened needs of the past days", it said.
This includes taking in their feedback, as well as explaining the current testing and health management protocols as defined by the authorities, said Sembcorp Marine.
On Friday, Sembcorp Marine chief human resource officer Chua San Lye accompanied Ace chief Tung Yui Fai during his visit to the dorm to assure workers that their concerns were being resolved.
"The safety and well-being of our workers are our foremost concern," said Sembcorp Marine.
"The company has taken measures to protect their health and safety, and will continue to do so."
 

Jail for former PUB employee who solicited $45k bribes from subcontractor​

mdcourt.jpg

Samuel Devaraj

Nov 15, 2021

SINGAPORE - As an assistant engineer at national water agency PUB, he supervised water diversion works performed by PUB term contractors and subcontractors.
While overseeing Pipe Works, a water and gas pipeline subcontractor, Jamaludin Mohamed approached its project manager and agreed to facilitate and expedite the company's works in exchange for money.
Over about nine months, he collected a total of $45,169.
On Tuesday (Nov 16), Jamaludin, 58, was sentenced to nine months' jail for accepting bribes and a further 10 weeks for attempting to receive a bribe from a civil engineering firm.
He was sentenced to a further two weeks' jail for falsification of accounts, which will run concurrently with his other sentences.
He was also asked to pay the sum he received as a penalty, in default of three months' jail.

He had pleaded guilty to these offences.
PUB dismissed Jamaludin in January this year, following an internal investigation into misconduct. That investigation was unrelated to his alleged corruption offences.
Jamaludin who appeared in court via video link on Tuesday was represented by lawyer Ashvin Hariharan who asked for a reduced sentence for his client, citing a past case where a director at a technology firm had attempted to bribe a government official.
Deputy public prosecutor Charis Low responded that compared to private citizens, "public servants are held to higher standards".

District Judge Lim Tse Haw agreed, saying the offender's role in PUB cannot be understated and his culpability was therefore higher, but noted that he pleaded guilty at the earliest opportunity.
Jamaludin approached Pipe Works project manager Ganisan Suppiah with his proposition some time in November 2017.
DPP Low said: "Pursuant to the agreement... the accused helped facilitate and expedite Pipe Works' works through means such as asking the main contractor to submit documentation quickly so that (Ganisan)'s workers could start work early, or giving (his) workers priority to lay the pipes at the sites."
After Pipe Works received payment from the main contractors, Ganisan passed the agreed fees to Jamaludin in cash between November 2017 and August 2018, through meet-ups at various coffee shops.
Using a company he set up in his son's name, Jamaludin prepared false invoices to bill Pipe Works for fictitious cleaning services at the various work sites, receiving the gratification money instead.

yq-gunisans-16112021.jpg
Ganisan Suppiah passed the agreed fees to Jamaludin in cash between November 2017 and August 2018, through meet-ups at various coffee shops. PHOTO: ST FILE

Ganisan was charged in August with one count of corruption and two of abetting Jamaludin in falsifying invoices. His case is at the pre-trial conference stage.
In July 2019, Jamaludin became acquainted with a management executive who oversaw the sales and projects of Teacly, a civil engineering firm.
Jamaludin arranged for a meeting with her on July 25, 2019, during which he said that he was able to help Teacly secure a PUB contract that the firm had submitted a bid for.
He asked for $500,000 in exchange, but the management executive rejected the proposal the next day.
Mitigating for his client, Mr Ashvin said that Jamaludin had a clean record prior to these offences and also had been awarded a long service award and a model employee award during his time at PUB.

He added that the only reason his client took the money was because his son suffered from a heart condition.
In response, DPP Low said that Jamaludin's son was born in March 2018, and that his offences had started earlier.
For each bribery charge, Jamaludin could have been jailed for up to five years, fined $100,000 or both.
For the falsification of accounts charge, he could have been jailed for up to 10 years, fined or both.
Judge Lim backdated the sentence to Aug 26, when Jamaludin was arrested.
 
ECONOMY / BUSINESS

Australian Woman’s Fight to Prove Singapore Fraud​

Harassed and vilified by unknown parties, she continues to press case despite bank’s explanations​



For six years, an Australian woman named Julie O’Connor (above) has vainly been tilting against the Singapore establishment in an effort to raise claims of fraud and what she calls a cover-up by powerful people over the acquisition of the Singapore and Vietnam assets of an Australia-based firm, Strategic Marine Pty Ltd. She alleges her husband Terry O'Connor, a shareholder, was thwarted in his attempts to acquire a controlling interest via pre-emptive rights he possessed.
For her efforts, O’Connor says she has been vilified on social media, publicly referred to online as a cockroach, obese, her photographs have been doctored into news articles which falsely showed her family members as being convicted pedophiles, all while she says she has otherwise been ignored by Singapore officials, all of whom repeatedly argue that evidence of any crime in Singapore is lacking.
Facebook attack
O’Connor says she has recently been notified by Facebook (below) that she has been targeted by sophisticated spyware not normally used by individuals but rather intrusive states, along with several other Singaporeans at odds with authorities including independent journalists Terry Xu and Kirsten Han and others. There is no indication of where the attacks are coming from.

Attempts also have been made to hack O’Connor’s website, www.bankingonthetruth.com, and intimidating messages have been posted threatening that someone would fly to Australia to kill her, as the screenshots below show.


As far as O’Connor knows, these online attacks/emails have never been investigated by Singapore police, even though some have been sent to her husband and daughter at their place of work. Senior figures from DBS, Singapore Police, and the Singapore Government were copied in, she says.
O’Connor has bombarded DBS Bank, Southeast Asia’s and Singapore’s largest in terms of assets, with emails and letters and has sought help from Marcus Lim, manager of the DBS account for the Monetary Authority of Singapore, Tharman Shanmugaratnam, a Senior PAP minister and chairman of the MAS, Lucien Wong, Singapore’s attorney general, K Shanmugam, the Singapore law minister, and Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong himself, to no avail.
Enquiries by Asia Sentinel to the Monetary Authority of Singapore, the Ministry of Law, and other agencies were met with minimal comment. A spokeswoman for the MAS said ‘MAS takes all allegations of fraud seriously, and had responded to Ms. O’Connor earlier and followed up on her concerns. Our engagements with members of the public and financial institutions are confidential, and the details of such interactions are not shared with third parties.”
The office of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong told Asia Sentinel by email that the office has “corresponded directly with Ms. Julie O’Connor regarding her allegations, and will continue to engage her as necessary. We will not be commenting further on the matter, or responding to the questions you have posed, as it is inappropriate for us to discuss such matters with third parties.”
Allegations against tycoon
O’Connor’s allegations involve Lionel Lee Chye Tek, who at the time was managing director of Ezra Holdings and chairman of its subsidiary Triyards, which were involved in offshore services, ship construction, global offshore, and marine industries. The group at that time was aiming to consolidate its position as one of the largest offshore services players in the Asia-Pacific region and was, at that point, darling on the Stock Exchange of Singapore
Lionel Lee was alleged by others to have caused four forged signatures to be affixed to legal documents on behalf of a no-longer-operating Bahamas company, documents which related to Strategic Marine, the firm Lionel Lee’s company was attempting to acquire. An associate of Lee, the then-CEO of KTL Global, Tan Kheng Yeow, was allegedly enlisted to enter into an irrevocable option deed to acquire power of attorney for the company. O’Connor charged that was an attempt to defraud her husband by persuading him his claim was worthless and that he should sell his 4 percent shareholding for A$1.
After Lee’s initial attempt to acquire Strategic Marine through Tan – for A$7 – was frustrated due to allegations of forgery, DBS would enter the arena. At issue with DBS, she said, were two letters purportedly from bank officials that were used to downgrade Strategic Marine’s week-old independent valuation by A$30-40 million and retroactively strip away O’Connor’s exercised pre-emptive right, prior to Lee’s attempt to acquire the firm for just A$1.265 million. A request to the DBS law firm Wong Partnership to explain the valuation downgrade was not answered.
DBS’s legal staff, O’Connor alleged, was asked by Australian legal firm Minter Ellison to authenticate the two letters, which she displayed for Asia Sentinel and which she describes as littered with errors or irregularities that banks aren’t supposed to make, including lack of a bank address on the stationery, absence of reference, and missing or duplicate bullet points. After eight weeks, she says, during which time Lee completed the acquisition, DBS refused to authenticate the letters, citing banking secrecy obligations.
DBS, through Wong Partnership, says its investigations “confirmed that the two letters in question are authentic and originated from our clients. Further, the results of these investigations were provided to Mr. & Mrs. O’Connor on previous occasions and that the O’Connors refused to accept the findings.”
Lee, acting on behalf of Triyards, ultimately acquired the Strategic Marine assets despite the Triyards Board’s awareness of O’Connor’s husband’s exercise of his pre-emptive right, the O’Connors charge. Lee at the time was represented by the high-profile Singapore law firm Allen & Gledhill, which was headed by the current Attorney General Lucien Wong. Lee's personal lawyer was said to be Edwin Tong, now Singapore’s second law minister.
Lee empire capsizes
Lee’s own empire was headed for a figurative iceberg. KGI Securities Singapore analyst Joel Ng in a research note wrote that Ezra Holdings had been reporting negative free cash flows in the previous 10 years, even when oil prices were above US$100 a barrel.
"Ezra leveraged up too much during the oil boom years, and the low oil price environment over the past two years dealt the final blow," he wrote, adding that the group's persistently weak free cash flows had resulted in a "highly unsustainable" balance sheet.
"Ezra basically wanted to compete against its peers funded with debt rather than equity. I would say it was blinded by its ambition and the fact that credit was readily available during that time," Ng said.
Study highlights mismanagement
According to an exhaustive, five-part analysis of Ezra Holdings and its subsidiaries by National University of Singapore Professor Mak Yuen Teen, titled EZRA and the Tri-tanic: “Based purely on public information, there were arguably failure to disclose material information on a timely basis, false or misleading disclosures, failure to disclose interests in transactions, insider trading, and failure to discharge directors’ duties.”
There were other questions, Mak wrote, “whether contract wins announced by the companies and the secondary listing of EOL just 15 months before it started reporting quarterly losses lured investors into buying notes, convertible bonds, and shares of the companies.”
Mak, in an email, said he was aware of O’Connor’s objections and said there was good cause to investigate them. Lim Tean, a lawyer and founder of the opposition People’s Voice political party, said O’Connor’s allegations are well known in the opposition political community and bear looking into.
Lee Unreachable
Attempts by Asia Sentinel to reach Lee through an associate got no response. By one report, he has moved to Thailand although that has not been verified.
Having paid more than A$300,000 for the shareholding only to be told all other SM shareholders had agreed to sell their shares to Lee’s acquaintance Tan for $1, O’Connor says she became suspicious and began digging. She says she found evidence of four forged signatures on Strategic Marine documents. A handwriting expert hired by the O’Connors analyzed the alleged forged signatures below. The supposedly actual signatures are on the left and alleged forged signatures are on the right. Vincent Lau told the O’Connors he hadn’t signed the documents.

O’Connor possesses a sworn statement from Vincent Lau that he had never seen, signed nor authorized anyone to use his signatures on documents, on behalf of the Bahamas entity which had been wound up 18 months before.
Furious DBS response
DBS Bank answered Asia Sentinel’s queries about the matter with a bristling letter from Wong Partnership, in which the law firm, which represents the bank, demanded that Asia Sentinel repeat the law firm’s letter verbatim in its story and reserved the right to sue.
O’Connor, the letter said, has not been ignored and the couple have raised the matters repeatedly with them. The central issue, according to the law firm, “pertains to the authenticity of the two letters, and investigations confirmed the letters are authentic. The contemporaneous record shows the circumstances under which these letters were sent fully justified their existence. There is no evidence of wrongdoing on the part of DBS or its employees.”
The bank, according to the law firm, “had constantly engaged with Mrs. O’Connor as well as Mr. O’Connor and other third parties. It is unfortunate that Mrs. O’Connor has since been attempting an ex post facto criticism of our client’s investigations as she has simply refused to accept any of the conclusions. Our client, therefore, saw no further purposes in continuing to engage with her.”
Bank refuses further response
A follow-up email with more questions elicited the response that “Unless you are able to furnish any new and relevant information and/or documents to substantiate the allegations made in your emails of 10 December 2021 and 24 December 2021, our clients do not see any purpose in further engaging with you.” It added that Mrs. O’Connor had acted with malice, which seems far-fetched but in legal terms would appear to be preparation for a lawsuit.
O’Connor’s crusade may or may not be valid. The documents show irregularities although even banks could commit errors. At the very least, there is no reason those irregularities and the many other serious concerns she raises shouldn’t be explained by DBS, the Singapore regulators, and legal bodies.
As she says, “Who is being protected and why?” she asked. “Is it Lee, DBS, Allen & Gledhill, the regulators who failed to act, the Audit Committee who stood down and not up? Who failed to look out for the Ezra Holdings and Triyards shareholders?”
 
Home News Latest News FairPrice Says Labelling Error Shouldn’t Have Occurred, Stresses They Do Not Condone...


FairPrice Says Labelling Error Shouldn’t Have Occurred, Stresses They Do Not Condone Unethical Practices​

They ask the public not to circulate unverified claims.
By Sabrina Seng
-
7 Feb 2022


FairPrice To Fix Labelling Error, Asks For Public’s Understanding​

Recently, a lady shared a TikTok video that shows a packet of chicken she bought from FairPrice supermarket weighed less than the labelled amount.
In a second video, she showed another packet of chicken bought from the supermarket, apparently relabelled as 0.144kg. She peeled the label off to reveal that the initial price tag showed 0.220kg.

In an update on Monday (7 Feb), the supermarket said that the video might suggest possible dishonest practices.
They clarified that they do not condone any unethical business practices and take such allegations seriously.

FairPrice admits labelling error shouldn’t have happened​

On Saturday (5 Feb), a TikToker shared a video of her weighing a packet of chicken she bought at FairPrice.
She found that the meat only weighed about 165g, although the label said it weighed 224g.

NTUC FairPrice provided an update on the case, saying they have since contacted the customer to address her concerns and investigate the cause of the alleged mislabelling.
fairprice-update-1.png
Source
They stressed that the error should not have occurred, and their frontline staff are working hard to correct this.
NTUC FairPrice also assured that all their weighing scales are independently calibrated by authorised vendors certified by authorities.

TikToker shares differences in labels​

On Sunday (6 Feb), the same TikToker shared that she went to get more chicken from FairPrice.
She found that they were now appropriately labelled, with new price tags pasted over the old ones.
FairPrice labelling error
Source

Upon netizens’ request, she posted a follow-up video of her peeling off the new label to reveal the original one.
While the new label reads 0.144kg, the old one read 0.220kg, making for a price difference of 82 cents.
FairPrice weighing error
Source
The TikToker also wrote in her caption that it was a big difference.

Refrain from circulating unverified claims​

NTUC FairPrice responded to the new video today (7 Feb), saying that the occurrence might suggest possible dishonest practices.
While they appreciate feedback for improvements, they emphasised that they do not condone any unethical business practices. They take such allegations seriously.
NTUC FairPrice said they would safeguard their reputation against false allegations if necessary.

The supermarket chain then advised the public not to circulate unverified claims that may cause unnecessary public alarm.
They appealed to customers to contact them directly with any concerns. This way, they can address them speedily without any misunderstandings.

Raise problems directly to NTUC FairPrice​

While customers have a right to point out such errors in labelling, the narrative can easily be misconstrued on social media.
It might be better to raise such problems directly with NTUC FairPrice so that the management can solve the matter more efficiently.
Hopefully, with FairPrice’s commitment to do better in labelling their products, customers will no longer encounter such issues in future.
 
Surely this is not an isolated case of negligence.

Police officers in Parti Liyani's case neglected their duties: Shanmugam​

ac_liyani_140222.jpg.jpg


The officers involved in Ms Parti Liyani's case have both been issued financial penalties. PHOTO: ST FILE
ds15042021_0.png



David Sun
Correspondent

Feb 14, 2022

SINGAPORE - The police officers who were involved in the case of Ms Parti Liyani were found to have neglected their duties and fallen short of expectations.
This was revealed by Minister for Home Affairs K. Shanmugam on Monday (Feb 14) in response to a question raised by Mr Zhulkarnain Abdul Rahim, an MP for Chua Chu Kang GRC, in Parliament.
Mr Zhulkarnain had asked for an update on the internal investigations.
Mr Shanmugam said both the investigation officer (IO) and his supervisor had neglected their duties, resulting in lapses.
He listed three lapses that were found.
The first was that the IO did not visit the scene of crime to promptly carry out investigations and gather evidence, contributing to a break in the chain of custody for some exhibits.
The second was that the IO did not properly verify some of the claims made by parties during the investigation.

The third lapse was the supervisor not providing sufficient guidance.
The minister said the officers had done their jobs under difficult circumstances, facing workload challenges due to a manpower shortage in the police force.
"I have sympathy for the situation that they find themselves in," he said.
"They have, however, fallen short of expectations."
The officers have both been issued financial penalties in the form of a fine and a number of months of increments foregone.
The minister added that the IO had been under intense pressure, handling many on-going investigations, prosecutions and conducting arrest operations.
"I have spoken before about the workload challenges that police IOs face," said Mr Shanmugam.
"The only way to deal with this is to increase police's headcount. We have not solved this issue yet. This is a difficult problem, and not easily solvable, given the general manpower shortage."
 

Ex-senior director at NParks jailed 4 months, ordered to pay $900 penalty for corruption​

1646185520146.png


Teva Raj Palanisamy was sentenced to four months' imprisonment and ordered to pay a penalty of $900 for corruption. ST PHOTO: KELVIN CHNG
jean_iau_0.png



Jean Iau

Feb 28, 2022

SINGAPORE - Between 2018 and 2020, a former senior director at National Parks Board (NParks) would get free lifts to and from Singapore and Johor Baru in exchange for giving business to a grass cutting company contracted by NParks.
On Monday (Feb 28), Teva Raj Palanisamy, 70, was sentenced to four months' imprisonment and ordered to pay a penalty of $900 for corruption.
One other charge for accepting a hotel stay in Macau in 2018 from another contractor, Ho Eng Huat Construction (HEHC), was taken into account in his sentencing.
Teva Raj worked in the Municipal Landscapes Division which maintains the greenery on government land by contracting private companies for these services.
In exchange for being more lenient with breaches, where a penalty could be imposed on the contracted company, Teva Raj accepted six round trips across the Causeway from grass cutting and greenery company Soon Sin Contracts' director Ong Eng Soon.
Mr Ong was also a GrabHitch driver and would usually charge $150 for each round-trip from Singapore to Malaysia.
The court heard that between August 2018 and March 2020, the six trips to and from Johor Baru were for a function, a meeting, a dinner party, a visit to Teva Raj's brother with his family, and two visits to a law firm to attend to a personal matter. Two trips involved Teva Raj being picked up from his office in 1 Cluny Road.

He did not offer to pay Mr Ong for the services, nor did Mr Ong ask for payment, said Deputy Public Prosecutor Victoria Ting.
Another former NParks officer, Mr Johnny Go, director at the division at the time, joined Teva Raj on two occasions.
He has been issued a stern warning, while Mr Ong was given a conditional warning.
Sometime in 2019, HEHC was experiencing manpower delays and Teva Raj suggested to HEHC to get Soon Sin to step in as a sub-contractor. Soon Sin took over HEHC's works for a period of three months.

Teva Raj also instructed NParks staff not to issue any notice of infringements to HEHC as this would cause disruption to the works.
Teva Raj's lawyer, Mr Bernard Sahagar, told the court that NParks had become his client's "family and passion". Teva Raj started working there in 1980.
He argued that Mr Ong and Teva Raj were close friends and, in retrospect, Teva Raj should have been more careful with his interactions.
Mr Ong told Teva Raj he made frequent trips to Malaysia and Teva Raj asked if he could go with him, said Mr Lee. The lawyer added that Teva Raj accepts that Mr Ong felt obligated to say yes to him.
Mr Lee told the court that Teva Raj's wife, a Malaysian, died in 2016 and he was primarily making the trips to Malaysia to settle matters involving her will.
For corruption, Teva Raj could have been fined up to $100,000, jailed for up to seven years or both.
 
Last edited:

Half of migrant workers involved in kickback cases each year continue to be employed in S'pore​

AK_sgcov3_290222.jpg

Kickbacks are illegal payments demanded by employers as a condition or guarantee of employment. PHOTO: ST FILE
ang_qing_0.png


Ang Qing


MAR 1, 2022

SINGAPORE - About 2,400 migrant workers, or half of cases involving kickback offences the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) investigated between 2016 and 2020, continue to be employed here, while the rest choose to return home.
Senior Minister of State for Manpower Koh Poh Koon told Parliament on Tuesday (March 1) that about 20 per cent find new employment, while 30 per cent opt to continue working for their employers after the kickback issues were resolved.
In July last year, Manpower Minister Tan See Leng said in a written parliamentary reply that the ministry investigated an average of 960 cases of kickback offences annually between 2016 and 2020, for a total of about 4,800 cases.
Dr Koh, who is also Senior Minister of State for Health, said the typical amount of kickbacks could range from $1,000 to $3,000.
He was responding to three parliamentary questions from Mr Louis Ng (Nee Soon GRC) on the issue of employers collecting kickbacks from migrant workers.
Kickbacks are illegal payments demanded by employers as a condition or guarantee of employment.
Between 2016 and 2020, MOM took enforcement action against an average of 102 errant employers each year for collecting kickbacks, he said.

On average, there were about five migrant workers affected per employer, he added.
Dr Koh said workers are helped to find new employment here by referring them to employment agency partners, which are committed to not charging these affected employees any fees.
"This would assure workers that they can continue to stay here to earn an income when they report their employers for the collection of kickbacks," he added.
Once a kickback is being investigated, employers will not be allowed to repatriate the affected workers and MOM will require the accused to return the money collected to them.
In recent years, MOM has used data analytics to identify and detect unusual patterns in hiring practices to uncover cases of kickbacks and has stepped up efforts to educate migrant workers.
However, it is more effective if workers come forward to report such malpractices, Dr Koh added.
He said: "Migrant workers who are asked to pay kickbacks should immediately approach MOM for assistance.

"MOM will investigate and take all complaints and whistle-blowing seriously."
If convicted for collecting kickbacks, employers may be jailed for up to two years or fined up to $30,000, or both.
For the offence of abetting the collection of kickbacks, offenders will face the same penalties.
 

2 JTC officers referred to AGC for untruths linked to wrongful clearing of Kranji woodland​

hzkranji100322.jpg

One of two plots of forested land cleared at Kranji Road, as seen on Feb 22, 2021. PHOTO: ST FILE
ang_qing_0.png


Ang Qing

Mar 11, 2022

SINGAPORE - Police investigations into the unauthorised clearing of Kranji woodland have found that two JTC officers had misrepresented facts and given inaccurate information to their superiors, Education Minister Chan Chun Sing told Parliament on Thursday (March 10).
The case has been referred to the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC), which will decide whether to bring charges against the officers, he said.
Separately, JTC said its board of directors will convene a disciplinary panel to consider appropriate disciplinary actions against the two officers, as well as their senior supervisors if they had breached their duties.
The two JTC officers - the project manager and his immediate supervisor, a deputy director - had told their superiors that the unauthorised clearance work on 4.5 hectares of the site was discovered by the project manager on Jan 13, 2021 during his site visit.
Mr Chan said this information was conveyed to MTI and incorporated into his answers in Parliament on Feb 26, 2021 when he was then Minister for Trade and Industry.
At that time, MPs had raised questions about the unauthorised clearance, which had come to light after aerial photos of the site appeared on social media.
Mr Chan said then that the unauthorised clearance occurred between late December 2020 and Jan 13, 2021.

Investigations have since found that clearance of those areas had commenced without NParks' approval before December 2020, said Mr Chan on Thursday.
Police also found that the project manager who was in charge knew of the unauthorised clearance prior to Jan 13, 2021, he added.
"His immediate superior, the deputy director, also knew. It appears that they misrepresented the facts and gave inaccurate information to their superiors," said Mr Chan.

Investigations have established that another two plots of land, which amount to more than 2.8 hectares, had also been cleared without NParks approval, he said.
Mr Chan's February 2021 answers had stated that clearance works were suspended from Jan 13, 2021. JTC has clarified that it stopped all tree felling but had continued with other minor work like vegetation clearing, he said.
The inaccurate information conveyed to MTI by the two JTC officers meant "some of the information I presented to Parliament, based on what they had said, was therefore inaccurate", he added.

Mr Chan, who spoke near the end of Thursday's Parliament sitting, said police have just concluded their investigations and presented their conclusions to him and other ministers earlier this week.
He said that after discussions with the AGC, he was satisfied that he could update Parliament on what the police have found but emphasised that the facts presented are based on the police's view.
"First, what I have said above is based on the police view, which could well be contested in court if the matter proceeds to court. And a court could take a different view of the facts," he said.
"Second, we need to be fair to the persons who may be charged; setting out the facts here should not prejudice their fair trial."

Given the unclear situation and factual disputes, the Government first wanted to rule out any possible corruption, he said. The Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) was asked to investigate, and concluded that there had been no corruption.
MTI is reviewing the investigation findings with JTC, and apart from possible court proceedings, MTI and JTC will take appropriate disciplinary measures against the individuals responsible, said Mr Chan.
In a statement on Thursday evening, MTI said it takes "a very stern and serious view of this incident" and does not condone such misconduct.
Separately, JTC chairman Tan Chong Meng said: "This is a serious incident and JTC acknowledges the lapses. JTC will remedy our shortcomings and improve our processes.
"We will tighten the execution of projects and compliance with rules, and ensure that JTC officers uphold the highest standards of integrity and governance in carrying out their duties."
The Kranji site is earmarked for industrial development. It comprised mainly unused scrubland left vacant after land occupied by the former Keretapi Tanah Melayu (KTM) railway line was returned to Singapore in 2011.
Mr Chan also corrected his statement that the contractor who cleared the sites had not been paid for the unauthorised clearing in December 2020 and January last year.
He said investigations found that some payments had been made for the unauthorised clearance of the 4.5 hectares plot of land.
He said: “Erroneous information was provided by JTC Contract and Procurement (Construction) Division, who processed the payments without realising that the payments included felling of trees in areas that had not been approved for clearance.
“There was no intent by JTC staff to mislead.”
Investigations also found that payments had been made for clearance of another plot of land, which was also cleared without approval.
Mr Chan added that if due process had been followed, approval would have been given subject to the necessary conditions being met.
“However, regardless of whether approvals would have been forthcoming, the JTC officers had a duty to give the correct information to their supervisors and MTI,” he said.
“Failure to do so is wrong, and cannot be excused.”


3 clarifications on Kranji woodland clearance​

Education Minister Chan Chun Sing on Thursday (March 10) made three key clarifications to his reply on Feb 26, 2021 to MPs’ questions about the unauthorised clearing of some forested areas in Kranji woodland.
1. On Feb 26, 2021: Then Minister for Trade and Industry, Mr Chan told Parliament that 4.5 hectares of the forested land there had been cleared between end December 2020 and Jan 13, 2021 without NParks’ approval.
The clarification: Investigations have since found that clearance of the 4.5 hectares commenced without NParks’ approval before December 2020.
Investigations suggest that two JTC officers had given inaccurate information to their JTC superiors about the time period that this erroneous clearing had taken place.
This information was then incorporated into Mr Chan’s February reply.
Investigations also found that another two plots of land, amounting to more than 2.8 hectares, had also been cleared without NParks’ approval.
2. On Feb 26, 2021: Mr Chan said unauthorised land clearing was discovered by JTC’s project manager on Jan 13, 2021 during his site visit.
All clearance works onsite were suspended immediately and remained suspended, he added.
The clarification: Investigations have since found that JTC’s project manager who was in charge, knew of the clearance before Jan 13, 2021.
His immediate superior, a deputy director, also knew.
It appears that they misrepresented the facts and gave inaccurate information to their superiors.
As for clearance works being suspended immediately from Jan 13, 2021, JTC has clarified that it stopped all tree felling but had continued with other minor work like vegetation clearing.
3. On Feb 26, 2021: Mr Chan said contractors had not been paid for the over-clearance in December 2020 and January 2021.
The clarification: Some payments had been made for the clearance, which included tree-felling.
This erroneous information that the contractors had not been paid was provided by a JTC division, which processed the payments without realising that they were for the unauthorised clearance of trees in December 2020 and January 2021.
Investigations have also found that payments were made for unauthorised clearance that took place before December 2020 involving some parts of the 4.5 hectares of forested land and another plot.
 

CNB officer convicted of voluntarily causing hurt to get confession​

md_venge_18032022.jpg


The judge said Vengedesh Raj Nainar Nagarajan was "evasive" when he gave his testimony in court earlier. ST PHOTO: KELVIN CHNG
shaffiq_alkhatib.png



Shaffiq Alkhatib
Court Correspondent

MAR 18, 2022, 12:18 PM SGT

SINGAPORE - An officer from the Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB) has been convicted of three counts of voluntarily causing hurt to extort a confession from a man, who was then suspected to be a drug offender, in January 2017.
On Friday (March 18), District Judge Salina Ishak found Vengedesh Raj Nainar Nagarajan, now 35, guilty of the offences following a trial.
The judge said the accused was "evasive" when he gave his testimony in court earlier.
The Singaporean, who has been suspended since October 2019, had committed the offences against Sivabalan Kanniappan after the latter was found with drugs on him at Woodlands Checkpoint.
The Malaysian, then 34, has since been convicted of drug offences and given 15 years' jail with 13 strokes of the cane.
In their submissions, Deputy Public Prosecutors Han Ming Kuang and Timothy Ong said that before Sivabalan was assaulted, he was stopped for an inspection when he entered Singapore through the checkpoint at around 3.40pm on Jan 2, 2017.

A blue bundle, suspected to contain controlled drugs, was found in a raincoat bag at the rear box of his motorcycle.

He was handed over to the CNB Woodlands team and an officer recorded a statement from him.
The prosecutors said: "In this statement, Sivabalan denied knowledge of the blue bundle. He claimed he had lent his motorcycle to his roommate 'Sivan'.
"Apart from this, he had no explanation why the blue bundle was in his raincoat bag."

Sivabalan later provided a urine sample and Vengedesh, then a corporal with the bureau, arrived at the Woodlands Checkpoint CNB office at around 6am after he was activated to attend to the case.
Prior to his arrival, Vengedesh was briefed that an Indian man - Sivabalan - had been arrested and that Vengedesh was needed to communicate with him in Tamil.
The two men later met and the court heard that Sivabalan noticed that Vengedesh reeked of alcohol. The pair later went to a toilet and Vengedesh started talking to Sivabalan.
The DPPs told the court that the initial interactions with Vengedesh were friendly and casual as the officer tried to build rapport with Sivabalan.
But this changed when the conversation turned to the blue bundle and Sivabalan continued with his denials.
The prosecutors added: "The accused then slapped the left side of Sivabalan's head, punched his left arm, slapped his face with the back of his hand and kicked the left side of his knee.
"As the assaults took place, Sivabalan cried and told the accused to stop. He did not fight back and eventually admitted bringing the bundle into Singapore and that it had been given to him by 'Nesh'."
The court heard that an escorting officer saw the assault but did not stop it. The men, including Sivabalan, then left the toilet at 6.14am.
As Sivabalan was giving his second statement, Vengedesh asked him what the blue bundle contained. Sivabalan was taken back to the toilet when he denied knowledge of its contents.
The prosecutors said: "Once they were in the toilet, the accused punched Sivabalan's left bicep, punched his left elbow and kicked his left leg between the waist and mid-thigh more than once. He did not scream for help as he thought no help would be forthcoming, and he also feared that if he cried out, the assault would be even more severe.
"During the assaults, the accused kept asking Sivabalan to admit that he knew what the bundle contained. During this time, Sivabalan was also crying in pain."
The assault stopped when another officer intervened and they left the toilet at 8.43am.
The prosecutors said Vengedesh assaulted Sivabalan for the third time after a second bundle of drugs fell out of the raincoat bag.
Vengedesh's offences came to light after doctors examined Sivabalan, who had complained of pain to body parts including his left lower ribs. He then revealed that he had been assaulted.
The DPPs said that, according to CNB protocols, the interview should have been conducted "without any threat, inducement or promise or oppression exercised on the suspect".
They added: "The interviewer should also not use any physical violence on the suspect... Instead, the suspect should be treated humanely."
Vengedesh is represented by lawyers Peter Keith Fernando and Kavita Pandey.
The defence's case was that Vengedesh did not assault Sivabalan during the three occasions in the toilet.
The DPPs said: "While he admitted being loud and firm to Sivabalan, he denied any form of physical assault against him."
Vengedesh's mitigation and sentencing are expected to take place on April 29.
Following his conviction on Friday, he still has three other pending charges for offences including harassment.
For each count of voluntarily causing hurt to extort a confession, an offender can be jailed for up to seven years and fined or caned.
 

Coroner concludes final inquiry after 8 of them reopened due to forgery allegations​

ads_statecourt_.jpg

All eight reopened inquiries are said to be linked to a police officer who allegedly forged statements in the cases. PHOTO: ST FILE
shaffiq_alkhatib.png


Shaffiq Alkhatib
Court Correspondent

Apr 1, 2022

SINGAPORE - Eight coroner's inquiries had to be reopened following allegations of forgery by the then investigation officer (IO) and the final one was concluded on Friday (April 1).
This last inquiry involved the death of Mr Chew Chia Ngiak, 66, in 2016. It was reopened after two earlier statements from witnesses were found to have been falsified.
All eight reopened inquiries are said to be linked to Station Inspector Kenny Cheong Chyuan Lih.
The policeman, who has been suspended since Dec 27, 2018, allegedly forged statements of people involved in the eight cases, including eyewitnesses and family members of the dead.
All the affected inquiries involved fatal crashes. They had been handled by the then State Coroner Marvin Bay, and he had to look into the cases again.
The original inquiries had taken place between 2016 and 2018.
Coroner Bay had handled the original inquiry into Mr Chew's death in 2017.

He said in his latest findings on Friday that the contents of one of the forged statements, taken from a 12-year-old boy, had no impact on the case.
This was because the child had "consistently asserted that he had not witnessed the collision".
Coroner Bay added: "The account of the other witness... was far more material... and a genuine conditioned statement was recorded on Sept 6 (last year).

"Even though the initial conditioned statement of this witness was forged by IO Kenny Cheong, investigations reveal that he had created the version depicted in the forged statement from material he had obtained in actual, albeit verbal, interviews with (her), which he then transcribed and converted into the forged conditioned statement."
Station Insp Cheong's alleged offences came to light following investigations by the Internal Affairs Office of the Singapore Police Force.
Seven cases were completed in the rehearings last year. Six were heard on Oct 18 and Coroner Bay was satisfied that there had been no miscarriage of justice for them.
The seventh case was heard on Oct 19 and the court heard that Station Insp Cheong's alleged acts of forgery had no impact on its findings.

As for Mr Chew's case, the court heard that he had worked as a fishmonger and owned at stall in Hougang.
Shortly before the accident in the wee hours of Sept 4, 2016, Mr Chew was driving a lorry at a signalised junction of Admiralty Road West and Woodlands Avenue 8.
His vehicle later hit a car driven by a teenage probationary driver who had obtained his licence in May that year. Mr Chew was later found lying on the road.
Coroner Bay said: "The evidence... strongly suggests that Mr Chew was not wearing his seat belt prior to the event and was thrown out from the cabin from the front passenger window from the force of the impact."
Mr Chew was pronounced dead at the scene at 2.46am on Sept 4, 2016.
Station Insp Cheong is said to have forged the statements of two passengers who were in the car - the 12-year-old boy and his sister, who was the teenage driver's girlfriend at the time.
On Friday, the coroner found Mr Chew's death to be an "unfortunate traffic misadventure".
In an earlier statement, the police said they were unable to comment on Station Insp Cheong's case as investigations were ongoing.
 
If it is so straightforward, why did it take so long to clear Ivan Lim?

Former potential PAP candidate Ivan Lim was not involved in controversial Keppel O&M projects: PAP​

hzlim120422.jpg

Mr Ivan Lim had withdrawn from contesting the 2020 general election following allegations of possible misconduct. PHOTO: PEOPLE'S ACTION PARTY
chooyunting.png


Choo Yun Ting
Business Correspondent

Apr 12, 2022

SINGAPORE - Investigations by the People's Action Party (PAP) have confirmed that its former potential candidate Ivan Lim was not involved in any of Keppel Offshore & Marine's controversial Brazilian projects, a party spokesman told The Straits Times.
"His public statements on this matter were truthful and factual," the spokesman added.
Mr Lim had withdrawn from contesting the 2020 general election following allegations of possible misconduct several days before Nomination Day, saying at the time that the allegations surrounding him had eclipsed the core issues of the election.
PAP leaders said then that they would look into the allegations made against him after the elections.
On Tuesday (April 12), the party spokesman said the PAP takes a serious view of the concerns raised by Singaporeans, and had conducted a thorough fact-finding exercise, which covered two aspects.
First, whether Mr Lim's public statements that he was not involved in any of the controversial commercial deals of Keppel O&M in Brazil that were subject to the investigation of the United States Department of Justice were true.
Second, allegations relating to his behaviour in interacting with others.

The spokesman said Mr Lim's public statements on his non-involvement with the controversial Brazilian projects were truthful and factual. Accusations that he was involved in those deals had been prompted by reports that he had worked on the Espirito Santo Floating Production Storage and Offloading vessel project.
The PAP's investigations found that the project Mr Lim oversaw was delivered to SBM Offshore, a company headquartered in the Netherlands. It was therefore not one of the projects which became controversial.
In addition, his responsibility had been to oversee the execution of projects in Keppel Shipyard, and he was not involved in negotiating any commercial deals.


Addressing the issue related to Mr Lim's behaviour in interacting with others, the party spokesman noted that the PAP had received a range of feedback, both positive and negative, about his behaviour.
"Perceptions on such matters are varied and subjective. But what is clear is that there is no question about Mr Lim's integrity and honesty, and his sincerity in wanting to serve the community," the spokesman added.
The statement also pointed out that while Mr Lim did not stand in GE 2020, he has continued to serve as a volunteer in educational and other support programmes for lower-income families in Jurong.
Mr Lim had been walking the ground in Jurong GRC and was expected to be fielded in the constituency.
The spokesman said the party acknowledges that how its candidates interact with others in their day-to-day lives is relevant for their suitability to be considered as election candidates, and that the recruitment of good political candidates is vital to the PAP and its leadership renewal.
"That is why we have developed a systematic and rigorous process for selecting candidates. This process will continue to evolve and be improved especially given the intense public scrutiny that candidates are put under."
The spokesman said that the party will ensure that its candidates are considered and evaluated fairly, so that it can put forward good and committed candidates from a range of backgrounds, representing the different aspirations and concerns of Singaporeans.
"The PAP will continue to do our best to find, select and field candidates with good character, competence, and passion to serve Singapore and Singaporeans," he added.
Shortly after Mr Lim had been announced as one of the PAP's new faces for the 2020 general election, allegations about his conduct had emerged online. This included posts accusing him of elitist behaviour and of being arrogant as a national service commander. However, there were also posts by others who knew Mr Lim, defending him and speaking about his character and positive qualities.
Prior to withdrawing his candidacy, he had issued a clarification in response to some of the initial allegations about his character and the claims about his involvement in the Brazil projects.
 

$3,000 fine for police officer who used criminal force on two NSF​

ads-ywh-13042022.jpg


Yick Wai Hong pleaded guilty to two charges of using criminal force. ST PHOTO: KELVIN CHNG
Osmond Chia

Apr 13, 2022

SINGAPORE - A police officer received the maximum fine of $3,000 on Wednesday (April 13) after pleading guilty to two charges of using criminal force on two full-time national servicemen (NSF) in 2020.
Yick Wai Hong, now 47, had in two separate incidents forced the heads of both NSFs down towards his waist during night duty at a police facility.
This caused one victim's forehead to touch Yick's groin area, while in the other incident, the second NSF's head came close.
Yick, who was suspended by the police from April 8 last year, was earlier charged with molestation, which had been amended before Wednesday's hearing.
The Straits Times understands that he is still with the police force.
The victims and their workplace cannot be identified owing to a gag order to protect their identities.
The court heard that Yick, who served as a station inspector, had numerous commendations over a 25-year career.

His duty then as the assistant duty officer required him to monitor surveillance equipment, and there were a team of NSFs under his charge.
During a night shift on the morning of Jan 23, 2020, Yick asked an NSF, then 21, if he wanted to take a break from duty, said Deputy Public Prosecutor Tan Yen Seow.
The NSF accepted the offer, but as he stood up, Yick shoved his head towards his waist. The incident was caught on a surveillance camera.

"The victim was shocked, disgusted and humiliated. His face was a finger's length away from (Yick's) groin," DPP Tan said.
The NSF did not report the incident until Jan 24, when he described the incident in a feedback form for NSFs about to complete their service. He later reported the matter to the police.
When the victim's superiors asked the other NSFs if they had any similar encounters, they found that Yick had done the same to another NSF, then 23, during another night shift that month or before.
The NSF had reached out to take some snacks from a table and Yick, who was leaning against the table near him, forced his head downwards such that his forehead touched Yick's groin area.

Seeking a fine that was left up to the judge's decision, DPP Tan said that Yick abused his position of trust, letting the junior officers down.
He added: "(Juniors) are typically worried about speaking out about their superiors, and this is telling in that the first victim did not raise the issue to his superiors until an ORD (operationally ready date) form was given to him."
Seeking a fine of $1,600 for Yick, defence lawyer Marshall Lim said that there was no sexual intent behind Yick's actions, adding that the incident was a "painful fall from grace" for the officer with numerous commendations.
Mr Lim said: "He was not motivated by lust; he wanted to remind the two younger officers of the need to perform their duties with diligence.
"But he appreciates that he ought not to have lashed out using force."
DPP Tan replied, saying investigations did not show that the victims had been negligent in their duties in any way.
In a statement to ST on Wednesday, the police said: “Station Inspector Yick was interdicted from service since April 8, 2021. Following his conviction on Wednesday, the police has commenced internal action against him.”
The police spokesman added: “Officers of the Singapore Police Force are expected to uphold the law and maintain high standards of discipline and integrity. We deal with officers who break the law severely, including charging them in court.”
The maximum penalty for using criminal force on a person is three months' jail and a fine of $1,500.
 

SP PowerGrid engineer, company director get 6 weeks' jail each in $20,000 bribery case​

AK_20k_140422.jpg

SP PowerGrid engineer Mervyn Quek Han Leng (left) shared confidential plans with One West Engineering director Ong Wei Jian. PHOTOS: CORRUPT PRACTICES INVESTIGATION BUREAU
tayhongyibyline_0.png


Tay Hong Yi

Apr 14, 2022

SINGAPORE - A senior engineer at SP PowerGrid was sentenced to six weeks' jail on Thursday (April 14) for receiving a $20,000 bribe from the director of an engineering firm in 2018.
The Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) said in a statement on Thursday that Mervyn Quek Han Leng, a 36-year-old Singaporean, sent a WhatsApp message to Ong Wei Jian, a director of One West Engineering, to tell him about an upcoming tender on the supply and laying of gas mains and services.
"Subsequently, Quek shared confidential gas plans which contained information such as gas pipe routings, locations and pipe sizes with Ong before the official opening of the said tender," said CPIB.
"Hence, Ong stood to gain a competitive advantage in the said tender submission."
Quek received $20,000 from Ong on April 4, 2018, for the information.
Both men were charged with corruption in April last year.
Ong, a 35-year-old Singaporean, was sentenced to six weeks' jail earlier in January.

CPIB said Singapore adopts a strict zero-tolerance approach towards corruption.
It advises companies to put in place robust procedures in areas such as procurement and internal audit to prevent themselves from falling victim to corrupt acts by their employees.
Guidance for companies on how to prevent corruption can be found in the publication Pact: A Practical Anti-Corruption Guide For Businesses In Singapore, which is available on CPIB's website.
Companies are also strongly encouraged to get certification under the Singapore Standard (SS) ISO 37001 - Anti-Bribery Management Systems, which is designed to help them implement or enhance an anti-bribery management system to reduce bribery-related corporate risk and costs.
Those found guilty of corruption can be fined up to $100,000, jailed up to five years, or both.
 

2 JTC officers among 3 charged over alleged wrongful clearing of Kranji woodland​

md_kranji_22042022.jpg

The cleared site created a public uproar as netizens and nature-lovers lamented over the loss of so much greenery. PHOTO: ST FILE
shaffiq_alkhatib.png


Shaffiq Alkhatib
Court Correspondent

Apr 22,2022

SINGAPORE - A deputy director from JTC Corporation was one of three people who were charged on Friday (April 22) over the alleged excessive clearing of Kranji woodland discovered last year.
The issue was highlighted after aerial photos of the site appeared on social media.
JTC deputy director Chong Pui Chih, 46, was handed seven charges under the Parks and Trees Act.
Also charged was Neo Jek Lin, 44, a JTC senior project manager at the time of the alleged offences.
He was handed eight charges - seven under the Parks and Trees Act and one under the Wildlife Act.
The third person, an employee from consultancy firm CPG Consultants, Tan See Chee, 63, faces five charges under the Parks and Trees Act.
At the time of the alleged offences, he was a qualified person and superintending officer of the contracts.

His colleague, Jimmy Liu Wing Tim, 62, a superintending officer's representative at the time, is expected to be charged at a later date as he is on hospitalisation leave until May 22.
The cleared site, which had been slated for the development of the Agri-Food Innovation Park, created a public uproar as netizens and nature-lovers lamented over the loss of so much greenery.
The cases involving all four have been adjourned to May 23.
 
Back
Top