Chitchat The stationary flat Earth

[hugs]

Really? I am so stressed up now I shall have sex tomorrow night to feel good again.

You don't talk so much nonsense of SamLeong, you don't have the privilege of the queen, wait you first one to kena permanent ban by leongsam and I will be LMAO here.

 

[ginfreely]

Really? I am so stressed up now I shall have sex tomorrow night to feel good again.

Go and look for your alien mate with extraterrestrial penis to feel good again.

 

[hugs]

Yes madam!

Go and look for your alien mate with extraterrestrial penis to feel good again.

 

[ginfreely]

Yes madam!

Lost alien, this NASA released video on aliens and UFO may help you find your mate for tomorrow night and return to where you belong for good.

 

[ginfreely]

And I already replied to you for that on 9 August. Some more replied point by point in details for those so called proof. In summary, I think such proofs don't hold water as you can't see or can't take pictures of satellites doesn't mean don't have. Just like what you see may not be the truth, what you can't see doesn't mean it's not true. The proof is in the pudding by the signals transmitted.

http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread.php?233492-The-stationary-flat-Earth&p=2491935#post2491935

https://www.quora.com/Why-dont-ISS-photos-show-any-of-the-thousands-of-satellites-orbiting-Earth

"Why don't we ever see the 1000's of near earth orbit objects in live feeds or pictures of Earth from space?
By astronomical standard, these objects are very small. They're also spread out through an enormous volume. Finding the cliched "needle in the haystack" is an easier task."

 

[ginfreely]

"Why don't we ever see the 1000's of near earth orbit objects in live feeds or pictures of Earth from space?

This type of picture..

Is quite misleading ( it's computer generated) the hardware in orbit is in real life so small that even the biggest, the ISS, would not even be a pixel on this scale"

https://www.quora.com/Why-dont-ISS-photos-show-any-of-the-thousands-of-satellites-orbiting-Earth

 

[ginfreely]

"The Int'l Space Station has a live video of space and earth that points outside the craft. Why don't I see any satellites or space debris?

....Satellites are also quite small compared to the vastness of even low earth orbit. The whole earth has a circumference of 24000 mi or so, and on orbit, the distance traveled by the ISS is even farther. The ISS travels that distance in a few minutes. It's easy to lose perspective.

You wouldn't complain that you couldn't see a fish in the ocean from a high flying passenger plane , and it would be a lot easier than seeing a passing satellite in another orbit."

https://www.quora.com/Why-dont-ISS-photos-show-any-of-the-thousands-of-satellites-orbiting-Earth

 

[ginfreely]

"Why don't ISS photos show any of the thousands of satellites orbiting Earth?

What makes you think that none of the photos show satellites?

Just because the ISS is in space doesn't mean it is much closer to satellites than we are on the ground. 45% of the operational satellites are in orbits more than 35,000 km above the ISS. Another 5% are in orbits around 20,000 km above the ISS. In a picture they would look like stars. We would only really recognize they weren't stars if the picture had a long enough exposure that trails were evident and the satellites trail would not align with those of the stars.

As for the rest, that are in low Earth orbit (LEO), even they will be hundreds of km away from the ISS and also be mere bright points of light, and the closer they are, the faster they would move across the sky.

Space is bigger than we imagine. Don't imagine it as a crowded highway of satellites. There are around 1100 operational satellites and around 2600 inoperational satellites, so around 3700, total. The surface area of the Earth is 510,000,000 square kilometers. So, if we were to take all of those satellites and place them on the Earth's surface - evenly spaced - each satellite would have about 137,800 square kilometers all to itself. That's an area about the size of the state of Arkansas. Up in orbit we are talking about a much bigger surface area, in fact we are talking about a volume so satellites can be much farther from each other.

Look closely at the thousands of images of stars from the ISS and you'll see satellites, they'll just be small."

https://www.quora.com/Why-dont-ISS-photos-show-any-of-the-thousands-of-satellites-orbiting-Earth

 

[ginfreely]

"..most spacecraft are orbiting West to East, at around 17000 mph, like a freeway all going in the same direction. You can only see those cars nearby, and the ISS could typically see only a satellite nearby going the same speed and direction. Since satellites are purposely spread apart and range from micro sats to school bus size, the sheer distance between them makes it unlikely that the ISS will see many"

https://www.quora.com/Why-dont-ISS-photos-show-any-of-the-thousands-of-satellites-orbiting-Earth

 

[ginfreely]

A photo of ISS taken by an amateur astronomer using a telescope.

 

[ginfreely]

Photo of a space probe taken by an amateur astronomer.

 

[chootchiew]

If the earth is flat, everything is on top, what is at the bottom ?

If the earth is round, we can travel shortcut by jumping into a hole we dig to USA.

 

[Macroeconomics101]

If the earth is flat, everything is on top, what is at the bottom ?

If the earth is round, we can travel shortcut by jumping into a hole we dig to USA.

This must be the most idiotic question in the entire thread. Have read through the whole threads, seen silly arguments and stuff, but none as spastic as yours.

 

[chootchiew]

This must be the most idiotic question in the entire thread. Have read through the whole threads, seen silly arguments and stuff, but none as spastic as yours.

Of course now it is impossible to dig through the earth core when reaches the lava fire section.
Supposingly the tunnel is already there , when you jump down from sg you will fall into the tunnel. The other end isn't it USA ?

 

[hugs]

Flat earth theory-everything is on same side. So SG is not on the other side of USA. Base on globe earth theory, nope too.

Of course now it is impossible to dig through the earth core when reaches the lava fire section.
Supposingly the tunnel is already there , when you jump down from sg you will fall into the tunnel. The other end isn't it USA ?

 

[chootchiew]

Flat earth theory-everything is on same side. So SG is not on the other side of USA. Base on globe earth theory, nope too.

I always thought other side is somewhere alaska region. Anyway if based on globe theory and let's assume a tunnel from sg pass through to other side, when we jump into the hole , what will be the outcome Base on physics ?

 

[Leongsam]

Really? I am so stressed up now I shall have sex tomorrow night to feel good again.

I couldn't care less whether the earth is flat but I would like to know whether your chichis are flat.

 

[Leongsam]

This guy's face is as flat as the earth.

 

[hugs]

A picture of my, whats the word, chichis?

But but then..

A picture is only 2D:p

I couldn't care less whether the earth is flat but I would like to know whether your chichis are flat.

 

[flatearther]

to flatearther:
why am i not surprised that you will chicken out of a simple bet.

Maybe because your long dong is too silvery? :p
Or maybe because I'm so nice, that I want to protect you from losing?

It is the easiest and cheapest way to test the theory and yet you backed out citing ridiculous reasons...

Please answer my questions:

I've already proven (or linked you to the proof) that it's a fake route, therefore there's no such flight to book.
Even if it's advertised, and I book it, and it turns out that it's a hoax (i.e. a stopover in the USA is required), will you believe me?
You'll probably accuse me of booking the normal longer one-stop flight, instead of the supposedly much shorter non-stop flight, right?
Therefore, in order to be ABSOLUTELY sure, it is YOU who should book that non-stop flight, right?

Yes, you will believe me, and not accuse me of booking the normal longer one-stop flight (when I show you my boarding pass or any other evidence), instead of the supposedly much shorter non-stop flight?

if the flight is non existent, alotta people will be interested, from journalists, politicians to rival airline companies...Qantas' reputation will be greatly affected so will its share price and share holders..

Just as NASA can cover up the fake moon landings and other fake activities in "outer space", while the majority of people still seem to believe/trust NASA, is it so difficult for Qantas to cover up a non-existent flight, while continuing to lie that it exists?