The Rigged US Election

[blackmondy]

South Park says it best.

 

[glockman]

The US Elites and probably unnamed foreign stalkholders are going all out to make sure their puppet Biden gets into the White House.


Here Are The Billionaires Funding The Democratic Presidential Candidates, As Of December 2019

This article reflects Federal Election Commission filings as of Dec. 31, 2019. Go here to see the latest billionaire donor count.

As Democratic candidates drop out of the race, more billionaires are jumping in. By the end of 2019, about 20% of American billionaires had donated—either directly or through their spouse—to at least one Democratic candidate running for president, according to a review of the latest Federal Election Commission filings. At least 100 billionaires donated in their own names. And at least 25 did not give any money directly, but are married to people who did.

Joe Biden and Pete Buttigieg lead the pack of beneficiaries. Forbes found that Biden had received support from 60 billionaires or their spouses by the end of 2019. Buttigieg had 56 such backers. The two billionaire candidates, Tom Steyer and Michael Bloomberg, outspent both Biden and Buttigieg with their own resources. By the end of the year, Steyer and Bloomberg had each shelled out over $200 million on their campaigns.

Sixteen new donors supported Biden in the last three months of 2019, according to a Forbes analysis. Biden’s largest donor appears to be real estate billionaire George Marcus, who gave $1 million to a super PAC supporting the former vice president in December. Marcus also hosted a fundraiser for Biden in the fall. His wife, Judy, pitched in another $2,800 to Biden, her first contribution to a presidential candidate this cycle, in October.

Forbes also found 16 new donors to Buttigieg’s campaign, including Walmart heiress Christy Walton and Kleiner Perkins legend John Doerr, along with the spouses of hedge funder Steve Cohen and Google cofounder Sergey Brin. Brin’s wife, Nicole Shanahan, reportedly cohosted a fundraiser for Buttigieg in December in concert with Netflix CEO Reed Hastings and Wendy Schmidt, the wife of ex-Google CEO Eric Schmidt. Earlier in the race, Shanahan donated $2,800 to the now-defunct campaign of Marianne Williamson.

Buttigieg likely has even more billionaire support. Forbes found two other donors whose names match the names of billionaire spouses, but we could not independently verify whether they were in fact the same people. The Buttigieg campaign also received a lift from VoteVets, a PAC that has paid for ads supporting Buttigieg and in August raised $100,000 from private equity billionaire Brian Sheth.

Forbes found eight new donors to Amy Klobuchar’s campaign. All but one of her new supporters had also contributed to Biden, Buttigieg—or both. Notable new backers include hedge funder Stephen Mandel, Laurene Powell Jobs and Nicole Systrom, the wife of Instagram cofounder Kevin Systrom. Powell Jobs—who sits atop a $25 billion fortune she inherited from her late husband, Steve, the cofounder of Apple—has also contributed to the campaigns of Biden, Buttigieg, Kamala Harris, Cory Booker and Michael Bennet.

While Buttigieg, Biden and Klobuchar’s groups picked up new billionaire backers—and Steyer and Bloomberg bankrolled their own operations—three other candidates got virtually no love from the upper crust. After Forbes reported that Marta Thoma Hall, who is married to a billionaire self-driving car pioneer, donated to Bernie Sanders, the Vermont senator returned the money in November. No other billionaires have sent him funds since, according to a Forbes analysis. Elizabeth Warren had previously received support from six billionaires and their spouses. But she upped her proposed wealth tax from 3% to 6% during the final quarter of 2019, which might explain why no other billionaires got behind her campaign. Hawaii Representative Tulsi Gabbard—who had previously received just one billionaire donation from Twitter cofounder Jack Dorsey—also did not pick up any new support from the richest of the rich.

Even the most recent campaign dropouts—Andrew Yang, Deval Patrick and Michael Bennet—received donations from new billionaires during the last three months of the year. But as Sanders has shown, success at the voting booth does not necessarily require support from the billionaires.



https://www.forbes.com/sites/michel...atic-presidential-candidates/?sh=5e9bcc233f7a

 

[nirvarq]

I don't side any one, but but........ Legal votes got watermark on it. Printed by DOHS, illegal votes don't have.

It's going to be exciting and lots of fun in USa ! lol.......

 

[winners]

South Park says it best.

Yadayadayada....talk so much cock here.
Go fuck your mother chee bye lah ! That is if you even can....

 

[knnccb]

The US Elites and probably unnamed foreign stalkholders are going all out to make sure their puppet Biden gets into the White House.


Here Are The Billionaires Funding The Democratic Presidential Candidates, As Of December 2019

This article reflects Federal Election Commission filings as of Dec. 31, 2019. Go here to see the latest billionaire donor count.

As Democratic candidates drop out of the race, more billionaires are jumping in. By the end of 2019, about 20% of American billionaires had donated—either directly or through their spouse—to at least one Democratic candidate running for president, according to a review of the latest Federal Election Commission filings. At least 100 billionaires donated in their own names. And at least 25 did not give any money directly, but are married to people who did.

Joe Biden and Pete Buttigieg lead the pack of beneficiaries. Forbes found that Biden had received support from 60 billionaires or their spouses by the end of 2019. Buttigieg had 56 such backers. The two billionaire candidates, Tom Steyer and Michael Bloomberg, outspent both Biden and Buttigieg with their own resources. By the end of the year, Steyer and Bloomberg had each shelled out over $200 million on their campaigns.

Sixteen new donors supported Biden in the last three months of 2019, according to a Forbes analysis. Biden’s largest donor appears to be real estate billionaire George Marcus, who gave $1 million to a super PAC supporting the former vice president in December. Marcus also hosted a fundraiser for Biden in the fall. His wife, Judy, pitched in another $2,800 to Biden, her first contribution to a presidential candidate this cycle, in October.

Forbes also found 16 new donors to Buttigieg’s campaign, including Walmart heiress Christy Walton and Kleiner Perkins legend John Doerr, along with the spouses of hedge funder Steve Cohen and Google cofounder Sergey Brin. Brin’s wife, Nicole Shanahan, reportedly cohosted a fundraiser for Buttigieg in December in concert with Netflix CEO Reed Hastings and Wendy Schmidt, the wife of ex-Google CEO Eric Schmidt. Earlier in the race, Shanahan donated $2,800 to the now-defunct campaign of Marianne Williamson.

Buttigieg likely has even more billionaire support. Forbes found two other donors whose names match the names of billionaire spouses, but we could not independently verify whether they were in fact the same people. The Buttigieg campaign also received a lift from VoteVets, a PAC that has paid for ads supporting Buttigieg and in August raised $100,000 from private equity billionaire Brian Sheth.

Forbes found eight new donors to Amy Klobuchar’s campaign. All but one of her new supporters had also contributed to Biden, Buttigieg—or both. Notable new backers include hedge funder Stephen Mandel, Laurene Powell Jobs and Nicole Systrom, the wife of Instagram cofounder Kevin Systrom. Powell Jobs—who sits atop a $25 billion fortune she inherited from her late husband, Steve, the cofounder of Apple—has also contributed to the campaigns of Biden, Buttigieg, Kamala Harris, Cory Booker and Michael Bennet.

While Buttigieg, Biden and Klobuchar’s groups picked up new billionaire backers—and Steyer and Bloomberg bankrolled their own operations—three other candidates got virtually no love from the upper crust. After Forbes reported that Marta Thoma Hall, who is married to a billionaire self-driving car pioneer, donated to Bernie Sanders, the Vermont senator returned the money in November. No other billionaires have sent him funds since, according to a Forbes analysis. Elizabeth Warren had previously received support from six billionaires and their spouses. But she upped her proposed wealth tax from 3% to 6% during the final quarter of 2019, which might explain why no other billionaires got behind her campaign. Hawaii Representative Tulsi Gabbard—who had previously received just one billionaire donation from Twitter cofounder Jack Dorsey—also did not pick up any new support from the richest of the rich.

Even the most recent campaign dropouts—Andrew Yang, Deval Patrick and Michael Bennet—received donations from new billionaires during the last three months of the year. But as Sanders has shown, success at the voting booth does not necessarily require support from the billionaires.



https://www.forbes.com/sites/michel...atic-presidential-candidates/?sh=5e9bcc233f7a

but boh lang want to fund dotard, normally ppl want to bet on the right horse

 

[winners]

but boh lang want to fund dotard, normally ppl want to bet on the right horse

Dotard's days are numbered. He'll be remembered as the most dishonorable President, who cannot humbly accept a defeat.

Biden was also poised to take the lead in Pennsylvania. As of midnight, Trump’s lead had shrunk to 0.3% — about 22,000 votes — with 95% of ballots counted. However, 366,000 votes — many from the Philadelphia and Pittsburgh areas — still remain to be counted, and those are expected to heavily favor Biden.

If Biden overtakes Trump in Pennsylvania overnight and manages to pad his lead, news organizations could call the race as soon as Friday morning.

Biden would clinch the White House with either a win in Pennsylvania or a combination of two wins among Arizona, Nevada and Georgia.

 

[glockman]

but boh lang want to fund dotard, normally ppl want to bet on the right horse

 

[tobelightlight]

 

[glockman]

Lindsey Graham Drops a NUKE On Dems

 

[tobelightlight]

 

[tobelightlight]

 

[knnccb]

Nope. authenic ballot voting paper has a secret watermark there. This will prove that the ballot paper is the real one. Those fake ballot papers do not have the secret watermark. This is not petty call about losing. A real fraud is being exposed.

View attachment 95100

factcheck.org has debunked this fake news conspiracy theory

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/11/bogus-qanon-claim-that-mail-in-ballots-are-illegitimate/



DEBUNKING FALSE STORIES
Bogus QAnon Claim that Mail-In Ballots Are Illegitimate
By Saranac Hale Spencer
Posted on November 5, 2020
Quick Take
A bogus QAnon-related claim that many of the mail-in ballots for the Nov. 3 election were illegitimate has spread widely on social media. But the claim is based on the faulty assumption that ballots are produced by the federal government.
Full Story
On the second day without a clear outcome to the presidential election, a QAnon-related conspiracy theory has gained traction on social media.
QAnon followers, who regard President Donald Trump as a crusader against a shadowy group of elite pedophiles who supposedly run the government, have been posting bogus claims that many of the mail-in ballots being counted aren’t legitimate.
One widely shared version that started on Twitter and migrated to Facebook says: “Consider: Dept of Homeland Security controlled ‘official ballots’ production. Dems print extras, not knowing about non-radioactive isotope watermarks on ‘official ballots’. Military sting operation. After weeding out all counterfeit ballots, Trump landslide confirmed.”
Another commonly copied post on Facebook says, in part: “The ‘watch the water’ intel refers to …..THE WATERMARK on the official election ballots!!!! …The DEMS fell right into the trap of this sting operation and TRUMP has it all!!! Fraud will be exposed for the world to see.”
Both of those posts are pure bunk.
First of all, the Department of Homeland Security doesn’t produce ballots. That task is handled by local governments which, typically, contract with printing companies to make the ballots. The Wall Street Journal reported in August on the increase in demand for mail-in ballots due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
As for the claim, “The ‘watch the water’ intel refers to …..THE WATERMARK on the official election ballots!!!!” That’s an apparent reference to a February 2018 post from “Q,” the pseudonym used by the person or people who post cryptic messages on internet message boards that are the basis for the QAnon conspiracy theory.
It’s unclear why QAnon followers are pointing to this two-year-old message as support for a claim about fictitious watermarks on ballots in the 2020 election, but many of the clues posted by “Q” are either vague (such as, “watch the water”) or wrong, such as the suggestion in 2017 that Hillary Clinton would soon be arrested.
Despite the flimsiness of the claim, it prompted at least one person to examine the remnant of her ballot with a magnifying glass and post a video of her investigation on YouTube. The video appears to show some small specks on the strip of paper she examines.
“Oh dear,” she says in the video. “I think there is [a watermark] … Are you guys seeing this? What do you guys think?”
“THE DEMS ARE IN FOR A GOOD ONE BOIS, THE TRAP WAS SET AND THEY TOOK THE BAIT. thanks for the video, you’re a legend,” responded one user.
“Trump, you are a Goddamn genius,” said another.
The video had been viewed more than 100,000 times as of Nov. 5, but it offered no proof of a watermark on a ballot, only a few small specks on a strip of paper.
Editor’s note: FactCheck.org is one of several organizations working with Facebook to debunk misinformation shared on social media. Our previous stories can be found here.
This fact check is available at IFCN’s 2020 US Elections FactChat #Chatbot on WhatsApp. Click here for more.

 

[Scrooball (clone)]

Evidence that mail in votes got stolen!

 

[nirvarq]

OMG this is going to be fun :

 

[zhihau]

Sacrilegious!!! Some votes that cannot be scanned were re-marked if I understand correctly, this watermark is going complicate things.

 

[Nice-Gook]

I don't side any one, but but........ Legal votes got watermark on it. Printed by DOHS, illegal votes don't have.

It's going to be exciting and lots of fun in USa ! lol.......

i donch noe what sort of watermark the ballets in US has


but as a person who know from trees ,to pulp to paper manufacturing...watermarking is no big deal,if you look at some of your stationary bond paper all of it has watermarking

watermarking is the lowest of technology in paper making

even hologram are duplicated in passport forgeries

guys in Bangkok does that for living , mostly Pakis in Silom road

 

[Nice-Gook]

watermark is not that big deal

every 4D your buy is watermarked , there is even such thing as security paper...the printer in SG who prints this sort of document is Toppan Moore

a lot of things are printed in security papers as well as water marked ,like some certificates like share certificate

all these are very old technologies ,easy to duplicate ,the very reason why our currency has multiple features of security not only water marking

even hologram can be easily faked

so ,I donch noe what this big hoo has about

if ballot papers were to be faked I dont think whoever doing it gonna be an idiot leaving the water mark unprinted

 

[tobelightlight]

 

[knnccb]

View attachment 95201

lmao, that time he ownself colluded with russia to win and now he say ppl collude with tiong

 

[cocobobo]

Lol....what bs... millions of Americans involved in the process and not one democrat knew about a watermark printed on all ballots.