IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
actually, Chinese on average had bigger families than just about anybody else in history. Just our recent history it's not the case. Even just 100 years ago...
actually, Chinese on average had bigger families than just about anybody else in history. Just our recent history it's not the case. Even just 100 years ago...
I think I failed to deliver my message. I try again hokay?
Chinese genes are more procreative than mudd genes per your original reply. The numbers speak for themselves. Back when economic realities were different, the average Chinese family for generations, perhaps for centuries, produced more babies than just about anybody on earth. mudds included.
So mudd genes is a less apt explanation than she's reverting to her genetic norm.