• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

The only paper that got the headline right. Sinkies are fucktards

To be honest, it's not much of a concern for Sinkies whether to abolish the death penalty for drug traffickers cos majority don't care.. There're many more other worrying matters to be concerned about....!
 
I like the death penalty as it has contributed to less violent crime. Now, if we can expand the death penalty for more crimes, it is possible to make SG crime free.
 
I fully support the death penalty as it is far less of a burden on the taxpayer.
 
Wonder why this guy does not condemn countries that practise sharia law that will chop off hands and legs for petty thefts and jail people for preaching non-Islam religions?
 
Wonder why this guy does not condemn countries that practise sharia law that will chop off hands and legs for petty thefts and jail people for preaching non-Islam religions?
Because it works?

In Saudi, shops are left unattended and unlocked when the owner goes to the masjid for his prayers. Valuables dropped on busy streets are left there for days because no one want to pick it up and be accused of stealing.
 
Wonder why this guy does not condemn countries that practise sharia law that will chop off hands and legs for petty thefts and jail people for preaching non-Islam religions?
Of course he does. Hence sinkies are fucktards. All the replies so far are from third world brains
 
If Sinkieland were a proper country there wouldn't even need to be a 'Ministry of Law' in the first place.

If you understand this, you understand everything. :cool:
 
Because it works?

In Saudi, shops are left unattended and unlocked when the owner goes to the masjid for his prayers. Valuables dropped on busy streets are left there for days because no one want to pick it up and be accused of stealing.
By your logic, why not execute people for everything, it should work better.
 
By your logic, why not execute people for everything, it should work better.
The same reason it's not done as western penal system of a graduated penalty.

Also you view their penal system as barbaric.
Ditto the westerners view Sg penal system.
 
More like there are no journalists in Sinkieland, only propagandists.

You can only see/hear what you're allowed to see/hear.

POFMA is nothing more than a cousin of the Great Firewall of China. :cool:
 
Branson 1:Sham 0.

"Never Wrestle with a Pig. You Both Get Dirty and the Pig Likes It."
~George Bernard Shaw
P74UH3W.jpg
 
If Sinkieland were a proper country there wouldn't even need to be a 'Ministry of Law' in the first place.

If you understand this, you understand everything. :cool:

This is even more difficult to understand...a non Muslim country having a full cabinet Minister on $m salary being in charged of Muslim Affairs.
 
This is even more difficult to understand...a non Muslim country having a full cabinet Minister on $m salary being in charged of Muslim Affairs.
another thing that is more difficult to understand is why do people/citizens even allow that?
 
The same reason it's not done as western penal system of a graduated penalty.

Also you view their penal system as barbaric.
Ditto the westerners view Sg penal system.
You contradicting yourself. You said chopping people's hands and legs off for petty thefts is good practice because it is effective, nevermind it's barbaric. Now you say it didn't go further otherwise it will be barbaric.

Mind you this punishment is prescribed by your god, not human. The logical reasoning behind it must be perfect and justifiable.
 
You contradicting yourself. You said chopping people's hands and legs off for petty thefts is good practice because it is effective, nevermind it's barbaric. Now you say it didn't go further otherwise it will be barbaric.
When did I say it is barbaric?
You do have a comprehension issue.
 
Back
Top