• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

The Inerrant Bible says: The Moon is a Source of Light

drifteri

Alfrescian
Loyal
Genesis 1:16:"And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also."
 

drifteri

Alfrescian
Loyal
According to part of Genesis, the moon is a light source just like the sun, only not as bright. If this was the case, astronauts couldn't land on the moon, it would be too hot. It is also strange that it took God the day to make the sun and the moon, but the stars are portrayed as an afterthought of sorts. "He made the stars also", this is a definite sign that the Bible is inspired by man. It is clear that man could not have perceived that the stars were the same as the sun, but in most cases much larger. Naturally they thought that these specks were just thrown about. The verse should read "God created the stars and planetary objects, he also made the earth, sun, and moon". But man, in those days, would have never seen it that way.

-Master Frank
 

drifteri

Alfrescian
Loyal
Let keep ourselves highly entertained and amused again, sit back and watch how creative and imaginative creationists make up stuffs and after-injections to cover for their inerrant Bible which they need it to be inerrant to support their salvation hope. :wink:
 
Last edited:

Frodo

Alfrescian
Loyal
According to part of Genesis, the moon is a light source just like the sun, only not as bright. If this was the case, astronauts couldn't land on the moon, it would be too hot. It is also strange that it took God the day to make the sun and the moon, but the stars are portrayed as an afterthought of sorts. "He made the stars also", this is a definite sign that the Bible is inspired by man. It is clear that man could not have perceived that the stars were the same as the sun, but in most cases much larger. Naturally they thought that these specks were just thrown about. The verse should read "God created the stars and planetary objects, he also made the earth, sun, and moon". But man, in those days, would have never seen it that way.

-Master Frank

LOL! I don't know who is this Master Frank that you kowtow to, but frankly speaking this Master Frank is just as failed as DIVA!

The Bible says the sun and moon are greater light and lesser light but this Master Failed said the Bible means the moon is exactly like the sun, so must be very hot also. LOL! And Master Failed is so desperate that he had to nitpick on the statement "God made the stars also" and pretend that he can change the words and write it better. Well, he is at least 4000 years too late! LOL! It is not rocket science to understand why God would make the sun and moon more the focus in Genesis 1, and that's because the earth is the reference point. And does it really matter what was the order of the words used for the failed DIVA? Of course not, DIVA will find fault regardless of how the words were arranged. Why? Because that's Bible bashing is all about!
 

Frodo

Alfrescian
Loyal
Let keep ourselves highly entertained and amused again, sit back and watch how creative and imaginative creationists make up stuffs and after-injections to cover for their inerrant Bible which they need it to be inerrant to support their salvation hope. :wink:

Actually it is the DIVA who has been providing all the entertainment, allowing creationists and theists to make a show of DIVA and exposing all the fallacies and failed arguments! LOL!
 

xpo2015

Alfrescian
Loyal
You are focusing on the non important things in the bible.

Bible should be read with historical meaning about people and events instead of a scientific journal.
 

Agoraphobic

Alfrescian
Loyal
NASA overcame this problem and sent the Apollo mission at night. That's when God switched off the lights and it cooled down. Mission accomplished!

Cheers!

................. If this was the case, astronauts couldn't land on the moon, it would be too hot......................
 

drifteri

Alfrescian
Loyal
NASA overcame this problem and sent the Apollo mission at night. That's when God switched off the lights and it cooled down. Mission accomplished!

Cheers!


Genesis 1:16 is unambiguous, it clears said that god CREATED(made) 2 great light. The lesser light is of course the moon.

Even though this verse says the moon is the lesser one, it’s still hot. Perhaps not as hot as the greater one.

Let see how the Creationists snake and wriggle! I expect them to say this verse must be read figuratively!
 
Last edited:

Frodo

Alfrescian
Loyal
Genesis 1:16 is unambiguous, it clears said that god CREATED(made) 2 great light. The lesser light is of course the moon.

Even though this verse says the moon is the lesser one, it’s still hot. Perhaps not as hot as the greater one.

Let see how the Creationists snake and wriggle! I expect them to say this verse must be read figuratively!

Fallacy of equivocation spotted! Go read out what that means. LOL!
 

drifteri

Alfrescian
Loyal
NASA overcame this problem and sent the Apollo mission at night. That's when God switched off the lights and it cooled down. Mission accomplished!

Cheers!

You explanation is very Christian like and may be taken literally to justify the delusion belief for the grave ERROR. Add some twisting, snaking and turning with words, you will be closer. :wink:
 
Top