- Joined
- Feb 11, 2014
- Messages
- 106
- Points
- 0
First, Sham-mugam is a bloody idiot for making a police report against a mere female civilian. If you want to refute her views, do so openly like a man. Why use the strong arm of the law to crush someone who isn't even a political threat.
What a bloody asshole.
But that being said, we should be aware of the history of Sangeetha Thanapal and her puppet Adeline Koh.
The following hyperlink reveals how they think.
http://boundary2.org/2015/03/04/chi...n-between-adeline-koh-and-sangeetha-thanapal/
Essentially, Sangeetha Thanapal believes that Singapore has been engulfed by something she calls "Chinese privilege". It basically means that Chinese in Singapore have used their numerically dominant position to gain an unfair advantage over the other races, leading to racism and oppression.
Racial privilege is something that plagues many countries. And I do not deny that the problem of racial privilege exists in Singapore, and that a national conversation on the matter is long overdue.
But Sangeetha's agenda here is not to raise awareness and begin a dialogue. Her stance is accusatory, inflammatory and sometimes downright insulting. Make no mistake, she is NOT interested in talking at all to the Chinese or to have any meaningful dialogue. Her campaign is that of a member of an oppressed class seeking to air her grievances.
To see this clearly, look here: https://medium.com/chinese-privileg...a-minority-is-talking-about-race-48e00d7c7073
This article was penned by Sangeetha's puppet Adeline Koh, a professor of literature at Richard Stockton College who has been manipulated by Sangeetha into parroting her emotionally charged views concerning race and racial privilege. Notice how Adeline Koh has embraced Sangeetha's confrontational stance and even says that Chinese should SHUT UP when a member of a minority race is talking about race issues
What a bloody asshole.
But that being said, we should be aware of the history of Sangeetha Thanapal and her puppet Adeline Koh.
The following hyperlink reveals how they think.
http://boundary2.org/2015/03/04/chi...n-between-adeline-koh-and-sangeetha-thanapal/
Essentially, Sangeetha Thanapal believes that Singapore has been engulfed by something she calls "Chinese privilege". It basically means that Chinese in Singapore have used their numerically dominant position to gain an unfair advantage over the other races, leading to racism and oppression.
Racial privilege is something that plagues many countries. And I do not deny that the problem of racial privilege exists in Singapore, and that a national conversation on the matter is long overdue.
But Sangeetha's agenda here is not to raise awareness and begin a dialogue. Her stance is accusatory, inflammatory and sometimes downright insulting. Make no mistake, she is NOT interested in talking at all to the Chinese or to have any meaningful dialogue. Her campaign is that of a member of an oppressed class seeking to air her grievances.
To see this clearly, look here: https://medium.com/chinese-privileg...a-minority-is-talking-about-race-48e00d7c7073
This article was penned by Sangeetha's puppet Adeline Koh, a professor of literature at Richard Stockton College who has been manipulated by Sangeetha into parroting her emotionally charged views concerning race and racial privilege. Notice how Adeline Koh has embraced Sangeetha's confrontational stance and even says that Chinese should SHUT UP when a member of a minority race is talking about race issues
Last edited:
