it might have been a leica then. definitely not a samsung nor huawei phone.I was thinking it was well taken.to the photographer.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
The Frustrated Indian
- Thread starter LordElrond
- Start date
All the names you cited are among the greatest leaders in Chinese history. Xi will feel so flattered.
It’s not an issue of communism or marxism or whatever you call it, these are form our substance. The model of democracy like US are controlled by a few elites, regardless of which party won. People don’t actually have a choice, people are merely fooled into believing casting a vote = having a choice. The issue is about leadership. In the last 20 years every dictatorship that was overthrown ended up worse for the country. Suharto, Marcos, Saddam, Mubarak, LKY, Tito… every single one
Xi is not bothered by the general behaviour of the public at large, unlike Mao who fears people become knowledgeable. His control is targeted at the elements that could destroy the country. This Tibetans and Uighurs are easily manipulated by the West. So are the Honkies and Falungong. If the Chinese leadership lets any of these disruptive elements rise, it will definitely break up like USSR.
Look at Mikhail Gorbachev, the high IQ moron. He believed the Eastern blocs countries will stay true to Marxism. He will forever be remembered as the weakling who caused the break up of the great USSR turning it from a superpower to a country ruled by warlords. Not flattering at all! History does not focus on Xi putting Bo Xilai out of power. It will remember Xi as the strong leader who pushed China into the international scene and remained strong in the face of adversaries.
LKY was not overthrown, he was succeeded by a seat-warmer and then, as planned all along, his son.
But yes, agree that it turned out worse.
These so called leaders did not know when to quit thus ensuring the destruction of their dynasties
Doubt if that's possible.should China split it'll split into three different countries .Tibet ,Xinjiang and China.Even then China is still a huge country.Nearly the size of Australia.Remember China is a rather homogeneous country unlike India
Well more money for Russia then I suppose.They can always increase natural gas import from russia
I'm not sure I agree. I witness so many of China's high-flying stars get taken down 1 by 1. He feels very much like Mao 2.0. An anti-Deng. I leave the rest of the argument about minorities out because I don't have satisfactory info.
As for Chinese leadership and breaking up... You may have a point. China was already broken up at the beginning of the 20th century and a large degree of nationalism was required to "unify" it. I'm still not sure whether it's the best way.
I wouldn't label Gorbachev a moron lah... He did what he did with what he thought. Maybe he thought wrongly. That's not weak. That's mistaken. There are plenty more moronic leaders out there. No need to say ok?
Currently history does not focus on Xi removing Bo Xilai (obviously!
). 50 years later things may change or not. Until some years after the end of Xi's reign, too early to predict.Frustrated - more like "Jealous" I should say.
It is natural for a person to feel jealous of someone's success. So when there is any opportunity to bring down that person, all guns blazing. I do not agree with such act, it don't change the status quo. Actually it is self defeating. However, the "feel good" factor is too good to slip by.
As in this case, because of history or competing issues. It had come to such stage. The Indian does not realized that the best way to beat China was to become better than them in all aspect. Especially in economic progress.
The Malays are jealous of the Chinese
The Indian are jealous of the Chinese
The Chinese are jealous of USA
The Iranians are jealous of the Israelites
The African Ugandans are jealous of the Indian
and so forth
If calling them names and undermine them makes you feel good, so be it.
Race and IQ
It is natural for a person to feel jealous of someone's success. So when there is any opportunity to bring down that person, all guns blazing. I do not agree with such act, it don't change the status quo. Actually it is self defeating. However, the "feel good" factor is too good to slip by.
As in this case, because of history or competing issues. It had come to such stage. The Indian does not realized that the best way to beat China was to become better than them in all aspect. Especially in economic progress.
The Malays are jealous of the Chinese
The Indian are jealous of the Chinese
The Chinese are jealous of USA
The Iranians are jealous of the Israelites
The African Ugandans are jealous of the Indian
and so forth
If calling them names and undermine them makes you feel good, so be it.
Race and IQ
Similar threads
