- Joined
- Jan 5, 2010
- Messages
- 12,289
- Points
- 113
My sense is that 2 factors derailed the system. One is depending on the scholar pipeline and ignoring the rest of society and the second is the 2 year posting system and the accelerated program of promotion. It allowed many to game the system and potential leaders are not identified or leave.
GCT batch was quite alright as they had worked for the first generation and they had strong anchors or role models to follow.
I remember the first generation of leaders were the first to identify the problems before the public became aware. Flood relief work, building tourism and manufacturing, the service industry etc.
The pioneer leaders helped PAP cement its reputation as a provider of all things good whether economic or social. The growth was shared by all strata of society. Leongsam's tale of his journey from a village of 50 sharing communal buckets to modern HDB sanitation was certainly no exaggeration and the pioneer generation will affirm that.
There were other factors leading to the rot. Lack of a free press, absence of political opposition and rule by the strong arm of the law made the PAP complacent. This in turn caused the dogma of yesteryears to become entrenched, making fundamental political change difficult. Another result is that the lower rungs of the political hierarchy operate like civil servants who have no clue about the political angle, whilst the upper rungs operate in an insular environment with closed walls aka ivory tower.