The Chen Show Mao Affair?

[yellowarse]

In every village, there is a village idiot, the village gossip, the village bully, the village vicar, the village smart arse mr know-all (that's my role), the village racist (there's a few.. I'm the anti Chink one) and that is how I like the forum to be. I welcome them all in order to create a microcosm of life.

You are free to mingle and associate with whoever you like but is there really a need to drive anyone out of town? I don't think so. If you place a nick on your "ignore" list, you won't see their posts or receive their PMs anymore. That's all that is needed for everyone to co-exist.

Attempting to get rid of our adversaries and the thorns in our sides makes us no different from LKY wielding the ISA to eliminate the opposition.

The only members I don't tolerate are those that try to burn the village down.

No, I don't believe in driving anyone out either. I just ignore these assholes. I actually told jw5 to let go and move on.

But life is a lot pleasanter without seeing this kind of petty bullying and personal abuse day in and out. (On the other hand, I quite enjoyed clinton666's impersonal over-the-top abuse and ironic humour.) That's what I meant when I said 'good riddance'.

 

[Leongsam]

No, I don't believe in driving anyone out either. I just ignore these assholes. I actually told jw5 to let go and move on.

But life is a lot pleasanter without seeing this kind of petty bullying and personal abuse day in and out. (On the other hand, I quite enjoyed clinton666's impersonal over-the-top abuse and ironic humour.) That's what I meant when I said 'good riddance'.

I could easily make this forum "pleasant" but then it wouldn't be sammyboy.com anymore would it.

Could you please talk to JW5 again. When I try and negotiate a truce between warring factions, each side will accuse me of favouring the other because they don't see what I have done. They only see what I have not done.

It's like when you get stopped for speeding, the question is invariably "why did you pick on me when so many other cars are speeding too?".

 

[tanwahp]

I could easily make this forum "pleasant" but then it wouldn't be sammyboy.com anymore would it.

Aren't you contradicting yourself if you find this "feud" involving JW5 isn't making the forum "pleasant"?

 

[Leongsam]

Aren't you contradicting yourself if you find this "feud" involving JW5 isn't making the forum "pleasant"?

I have no problems with feuding. It's a hallmark of the forum. I have no desire to sterilise the forum.

The issue here is not about feuding. It's about trying to do whatever is necessary including breaches of privacy to shut the other party up and drive him out of town.

 

[tanwahp]

I have no problems with feuding. It's a hallmark of the forum. I have no desire to sterilise the forum.

The issue here is not about feuding. It's about trying to do whatever is necessary including breaches of privacy to shut the other party up and drive him out of town.

Whether feuding or breaches of privacy, your key objection is to "shut the other party up and drive him out of town".

Anyone can argue that feuding also causes forummers to be driven out of town. I can also quit due to your spamming that broke up my posts.

The thing about "breaches of privacy" is that it can never be proven. Who knows if Scroobal is really that person or JW5 is "Kurt". You can only believe but cannot prove, so there is really no breach or serious outcome. Or if I start calling Yellowarse "Lim Swee Say", I would be happy if that causes the real Lim Swee Say to be expelled from PAP.

The mature players will ignore even if another party is spot on on their identity and you leave it to them to exercise this maturity - then that's real liberty.

 

[Leongsam]

Whether feuding or breaches of privacy, your key objection is to "shut the other party up and drive him out of town".

Anyone can argue that feuding also causes forummers to be driven out of town. I can also quit due to your spamming that broke up my posts.

The thing about "breaches of privacy" is that it can never be proven. Who knows if Scroobal is really that person or JW5 is "Kurt". You can only believe but cannot prove, so there is really no breach or serious outcome. Or if I start calling Yellowarse "Lim Swee Say", I would be happy if that causes the real Lim Swee Say to be expelled from PAP.

The mature players will ignore even if another party is spot on on their identity and you leave it to them to exercise this maturity - then that's real liberty.

The thin skinned ones left long ago.

 

[GoldenPeriod]

The detective skills are amazing. How do you all manage to find out who the guy is in real life? Better sign up to join CID.

 

[Clone]

I have no problems with feuding. It's a hallmark of the forum. I have no desire to sterilise the forum.

The issue here is not about feuding. It's about trying to do whatever is necessary including breaches of privacy to shut the other party up and drive him out of town.

internet privacy? brudder u just come out of which cave?

 

[Seee3]

internet privacy? brudder u just come out of which cave?

Trust him. It is so private that even the country's security agency is unable to track the real person behind the moniker in this forum.

 

[kukubird58]

It's like when you get stopped for speeding, the question is invariably "why did you pick on me when so many other cars are speeding too?".

hahaha...u twit, well said.....
and the retard would go a step further and said it is stupid to have laws against speeding when only a small percentage of people who speed is caught.....lol.
now a belated happy new year to my idol and all.....

 

[GoldenPeriod]

Trust him. It is so private that even the country's security agency is unable to track the real person behind the moniker in this forum.

last time like not so jia lat.

 

[kingrant]

I cannot agree more with what you said. Just the thing I would have said too. Spot on.

Easy to make claims and I hve never believed in them. Tracking and stalking - all a waste of time.
As in real life, you have the people you cant bully, the people you can bully, etc.. live and let live..

Whether feuding or breaches of privacy, your key objection is to "shut the other party up and drive him out of town".

Anyone can argue that feuding also causes forummers to be driven out of town. I can also quit due to your spamming that broke up my posts.

The thing about "breaches of privacy" is that it can never be proven. Who knows if Scroobal is really that person or JW5 is "Kurt". You can only believe but cannot prove, so there is really no breach or serious outcome. Or if I start calling Yellowarse "Lim Swee Say", I would be happy if that causes the real Lim Swee Say to be expelled from PAP.

The mature players will ignore even if another party is spot on on their identity and you leave it to them to exercise this maturity - then that's real liberty.

 

[kingrant]

Haha...yeah, amazing..the claims and the claimed skills..
I always laugh when they claim Scroobal=TFBH=kingrant.. dunno who else.
And you have the usual circus who believed in the Prophet.

The detective skills are amazing. How do you all manage to find out who the guy is in real life? Better sign up to join CID.

 

[jw5]

This is the question that all the staunch sycophants including the stupid sexagenarian should ask themselves:

Why has internet moniker Scroobal stopped posting since July 2013?

LOL ............. LOL

 

[wwabbit]

There's really nothing interesting that has happened since the Punggol East BE.
I'm sure he will appear again in 2016

 

[kingrant]

C'mon lah. Surely you are secretly also wishing he will return.....LOL...admit it.

This is the question that all the staunch sycophants including the stupid sexagenarian should ask themselves:

Why has internet moniker Scroobal stopped posting since July 2013?

LOL ............. LOL

 

[kingrant]

A lot of claims and based on flimsy correlations...where's the real proof?

 

[eatshitndie]

Spot on.

this mutually masturbating "spot on" phrase is beginning to annoy me. it reminds me of my dealings with the old cohort of english-educated sg civil servants in my awful past life. it's a lingo of the old boys network, and in fact it may just be the modus operandi of one. i have no fond memories, and if any mudder fugger were to bring up "spot on" again to mutually masturbate each other, i have no choice but to fuck you upside down. thank you.

 

[kingrant]

You do what you have to do and I say what I have to say. No one tells me what phrase can be used or said. Not happy, tear your hair off or tear your heart out. "Mutually masturbating" is another cliche which you should desist in using.

this mutually masturbating "spot on" phrase is beginning to annoy me. it reminds me of my dealings with the old cohort of english-educated sg civil servants in my awful past life. it's a lingo of the old boys network, and in fact it may just be the modus operandi of one. i have no fond memories, and if any mudder fugger were to bring up "spot on" again to mutually masturbate each other, i have no choice but to fuck you upside down. thank you.

 

[jw5]

I have to admit that this is true.

C'mon lah. Surely you are secretly also wishing he will return.....LOL...admit it.