- Joined
- Aug 8, 2008
- Messages
- 28,843
- Points
- 113
much of the sbf crowd here are not interested in facts.
I am very interested in facts ok! So, is there a rabbit in on the moon?
much of the sbf crowd here are not interested in facts.
It's not easy to know if a woman is faking orgasm or not faking it.
I am very interested in facts ok! So, is there a rabbit in on the moon?
The fact is my pockmarked face is like the surface of the moon.
1) if that time 60s technology can go moon and return, how come now after 50 years later, most space missions can only do 1 way trip no return leh?
2) 60s that time budget cost how much? that time $1 mil is alot already, today govts got trillions why dont go? why just shoot capsules and satellites only?
that is both scientific and gospel truth
Yu
Don't think it is beneficial to send anymore moon trip.
May be, China wants to try out...
Couple Of Hoaxes:
1. Their whole family is "exceptional".
2. The ministars are "heavyweights" and indispensable.
dunno about moon landing.
but bruce lee really overhype. Yuan Wah was Bruce Lee stunt double [all or some or one scene only? typical PAP mind trick!:oIo:]. Real kongfu need stunt double one meh? [stupid question see comments to prior sentence :kma:]
Thanks...u are more observant...Did not see those wires for some 20 years..
At least u clear one part of the mystery.
but all these technical jargons can be easily scripted for public relations purpose mah, precisely just make it sound scientifically and technologically feasible and convincing to the layman