Station’s safety features ‘adequate’
Defence witness: Features among best in the world during that time
Published on Nov 02, 2012, ST
By Joyce Lim
ACCORDING to testimony yesterday, Ang Mo Kio MRT station was as safe as it could be when Nitcharee Peneakchanasak, 16, fell on its tracks in April last year.
On the fourth day of the Thai teenager's trial against rail operator SMRT and the Land Transport Authority (LTA), the defendants' lawyer K. Anparasan of KhattarWong called on an expert witness to prove his point.
Mr Anparasan told the court that at the time of the accident, the station had adequate and reasonable safety features, despite not having screen doors on its platform.
This view was endorsed by the defendants' witness, Mr John Peter O'Grady, head of the safety and environment department of the Toronto Transit Commission. He helps develop safety policies and implement safety measures and systems.
Mr O'Grady noted that Singapore has both tactile warnings for the handicapped as well as yellow safety lines on platforms.
This week, Mr O'Grady visited Ang Mo Kio station and learnt of the ambassadors patrolling the platform during peak hours.
He said: "Nowhere in North America do we have (such) ambassadors. There are station managers in New York City, but they are more of providing customer service and giving directions."
Mr O'Grady did not think that having more ambassadors patrolling the station would be a more effective safety practice, as suggested by Professor Natarajan Krishnamurthy, an expert witness for Nitcharee.
Nitcharee is seeking $3.4 million in damages from SMRT and the LTA, after claiming that jostling crowds on the platform had caused her to lose her balance and fall onto the tracks.
She lost both legs in the accident on April 3 last year.
Her lawyer Cosmas Gomez of Cosmas & Co claims SMRT and the LTA should have had sufficient safety measures that could have prevented the accident.
Prof Krishnamurthy told the court that the accident would not have happened if barriers had been put up on the edge of the platform.
As it would take between four and five years to install the screen doors throughout the network, SMRT and the LTA should have put up temporary interim barriers.
But Mr Anparasan disputed Prof Krishnamurthy's suggestion, citing that it would not be feasible as the cost involved in erecting the temporary barriers and monitoring them would be in excess of $170 million.
"That would be disproportionate to the cost of the actual screen doors of $126 million," said Mr Anparasan.
Only about 40 out of 180 countries have platform screen doors, and they are not installed in every station, the court heard.
In his report on safety issues commissioned by the lawyer, Mr O'Grady said that at the time of the incident, Singapore's platform safety systems were among the best in the world and completely adequate to meet the needs of all passengers, including those with visual disabilities.
[email protected]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The above is pretty much what I had already said.
We are a completely sissified country.