• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Thai chio bu PM forced to resign over abuse of power - WHO IS NEXT?

Wow Thai court and constitution so good, can remove the prime minister. They are higher standard than Singapore indeed. Outsource to them is good, anyway no difference whether Singaporean or foreigner at the helm, it is bias against Singaporean.

It's a shocking, dysfunctional system which is open to blatant abuse by the judiciary and enemies of the elected government.

For example the army can simply bribe a judge to get rid of a PM they don't like.

The Thai PM was voted in by the electorate. The electorate should therefore be the only entity that can remove her from office via the ballot box.
 
It's a shocking, dysfunctional system which is open to blatant abuse by the judiciary and enemies of the elected government.

For example the army can simply bribe a judge to get rid of a PM they don't like.

The Thai PM was voted in by the electorate. The electorate should therefore be the only entity that can remove her from office via the ballot box.

if you say lidat, then all the more ex President ah Bian should not be jailed nvm what crime he committed.
 
if you say lidat, then all the more ex President ah Bian should not be jailed nvm what crime he committed.

What "crime" has the Thai PM committed? Appointing and re assigning staff is part and parcel of the job. Every incoming US president does the same thing. He cleans out the old and appoints his own people to key positions.
 
job discrimination. removal of person/s holding an official posts and nepotism and croynism.
 
job discrimination. removal of person/s holding an official posts and nepotism and croynism.

I've done the same thing numerous times. I inherited a team from previous management, got rid of those whom I felt were not supportive of my way of doing things and replaced them with managers that I had worked with before and felt comfortable with.

These are management decisions not crimes.
 
these r civil servant not private companies. their job is not to parlance to your likes and nooks. their job is to uphold the law n transparency in conduct. you cannot allow the judiciary, the enforcers and administration to suit a persons private need to run the country like his own father's company, then bad things will happen. that in civil goverance is check and balance.

国有国法, 家有家规i 不得无法无天。
 
these r civil servant not private companies. their job is not to parlance to your likes and nooks. their job is to uphold the law n transparency in conduct. you cannot allow the judiciary, the enforcers and administration to suit a persons private need to run the country like his own father's company, then bad things will happen. that in civil goverance is check and balance.

国有国法, 家有家规i 不得无法无天。

The job of the civil service is to implement government policy. If they don't do their jobs, they can be sacked or reshuffled just like anyone else.

It's done in the UK too. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...ace-sack-if-they-fail-to-deliver-8145191.html

Civil servants face sack if they fail to deliver

Tuesday 18 September 2012

Britian's most senior civil servants could be dismissed if they fail to promptly implement Government policy, the Cabinet Office Minister Francis Maude suggested yesterday, as he drafted in a think tank to come up with plans to reform Whitehall.

Mr Maude said the Institute for Public Policy Research had been commissioned to examine the advantages of Britain adopting a system of greater civil service accountability. Researchers will study how governments operate in Australia, Singapore, the US, France and Sweden and report back to the Cabinet Office by Christmas. There will be a particular focus on the system in New Zealand, where senior civil servants have a contractual responsibility to their ministers to push policies through.

Mr Maude said reform was necessary because the experience of ministers – both in this Government and the last – had been that their decisions had not always been acted upon. "Ministers who are democratically accountable must be able to get what they decide implemented," he said.



 
ginfreely said:
Wow Thai court and constitution so good, can remove the prime minister. ..higher standard than Singapore indeed. Outsource to them is good, anyway no difference whether Singaporean or foreigner at the helm, it is bias against Singaporean.
Comparing durians vs soursops? Diff political and legislative makeup.
shocking, dysfunctional system which is open to blatant abuse by the judiciary and enemies of the elected government.
The Thai PM was voted in by the electorate. The electorate should therefore be the only entity that can remove her from office via the ballot box.
3 PMs ousted in 8 years by same modus operandi. Amazing Thailand, some record

What you have is only a lame duck govt in place, for extended period (if July's election gets through). No new bills, business climate fragile ...with only civil servants payroll to sanction
 
Last edited:
it only goes to show how much more stable and superior the sg system is, thanks to the pap. :D
 
Actually Yingluck would not be in this mess if she did not insist on giving her brother amnesty,,,she is in this mess is cause she ask for it,,,
 
so? he has not be proven to slack. he was made to give way for the powerful job to a crony. that is not meritocrazy, it is familee business.

Governments are free to choose civil servants whom they think can do the job and remove those who they perceive to be unsupportive of government policies. It's the same the world over.

Eg in the USA, after every presidential election, if a new President moves into the white house, he will get rid of the incumbents put his own team in positions of power. That's what politics is all about.
 
What "crime" has the Thai PM committed? Appointing and re assigning staff is part and parcel of the job. Every incoming US president does the same thing. He cleans out the old and appoints his own people to key positions.

Thailand’s deposed prime minister Yingluck Shinawatra faces impeachment over a costly rice subsidy that could ban her from politics for five years, ending any hopes she may have of staging an electoral comeback.

The country’s anti-corruption commission ruled 7-0 to send the case to the Senate recommending impeachment, a day after the country’s Constitutional Court controversially forced Ms Yingluck from office, enraging her supporters who are planning mass protests.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/world/thailan...sis-deepens-20140508-zr77s.html#ixzz31888fuH9

7-0 hatrick... guilty a charged. Thailand is lucky to have such magnimous and fair judiciary that are able to uphold the law and prevent croynism and nepotism from hijacking democrazy.
 
It's a shocking, dysfunctional system which is open to blatant abuse by the judiciary and enemies of the elected government.

For example the army can simply bribe a judge to get rid of a PM they don't like.

The Thai PM was voted in by the electorate. The electorate should therefore be the only entity that can remove her from office via the ballot box.

In the grand scheme of things, the system being subject to abuse is nothing compared to a system that is unable to stop traitor government from selling out the country to foreigners.
 
Last edited:
Comparing durians vs soursops? Diff political and legislative makeup.

3 PMs ousted in 8 years by same modus operandi. Amazing Thailand, some record

What you have is only a lame duck govt in place, for extended period (if July's election gets through). No new bills, business climate fragile ...with only civil servants payroll to sanction

Soursop is Angmoh liew lian? Of course durian wins haha. Perhaps the 3 changes are necessary to real progress in the long term vs a country with same government and many business benefits but such benefits going to the foreigners and selected citizens only while other citizens get the scraps.
 
so? he has not be proven to slack. he was made to give way for the powerful job to a crony. that is not meritocrazy, it is familee business.

so you are real good at talking cock ? ZAP!
 
Actually Yingluck would not be in this mess if she did not insist on giving her brother amnesty,,,she is in this mess is cause she ask for it,,,

Has the king or anyone else the right to persecute another Thai?
 
Back
Top