70% will disagree with you. if its 1/3 the population earning that low amount,,,and they happy with the pap,,,,than they deserve to get FUCKED,,,,in singkieland taxis become expensive when the surcharges are added up...in 1st world countries taxis are expensive that is why uber can survive there,,,in spore,,its cheaper if no surge pricing,,,and during rush hours,,uber is more expensive than taxis,,,in ozland uber is doing well because they are cheaper than taxis,,,the taxis in ozland is 3 bucks a km,,,in Singapore its $1 buck a km...but with surcharge the price is different. 2.3k per month in singkieland is minimum wage in Ozland,, and that also means that the wage level is worse than in ozland,,,another reason why I say in singkieland the taxi is cheaper as per international standard is when I am in 3rd world countries like Pinoyland or Vietcong land or indonland,,the taxis are just slightly cheaper than in Singapore (based on distance and after exchange rate) ,,,and their pay is much lower than in singkieland,,,so in terms of earnings versus cost,,,and singkieland with COE, ERP, fuel tax etc,,,the price is comparable,,,that is why I say if the taxi companies get rid of those bullshit surcharges etc, taxis can compete with uber,,,if singkieland have no higher wages,,why all the foreigners are clamouring to come over to singkieland to make a living? And even after exchange rate,,,another example to use is JB,,u take a taxi in JB,,,and compare dollar to dollar and even after exchange rate conversion,,,who is better off? earning in singkieland and spending in singkieland? or working and earning in JB?
Sinkieland taxis are not cheap.when u consider there is no minimum wage in Singapore and the average wage of uni grads is almost as low as blue collar worker in western countries.1.3 million sinkies make less than 2.3k a month and qualify for GST vouchers.have u ever heard of a first world nation where 40 to 50 percent of the population earn less than 1/3rd the GDP per capital?