same as in a wedding - speak now or forever hold thy tongue :(
Better than wedding. every 4 years they get blessings and reaffirmation.
same as in a wedding - speak now or forever hold thy tongue :(
Better than wedding. every 4 years they get blessings and reaffirmation.
Did Dr Tan engage the service of Raffles Place or People's Park lawyers ?
Lim Suet Fern will represent him for free since she got fucked over by PAPzis policies.
Methinks it will pass unabated. Dont think the Lee Jr govt will bother. He has always not, and still garnered 70%. He knows how stupid sinkies minds work.
The PE will turn out to be like Macron...lowest turnout including the Malays, with the foreseen slim win for the PAP. Again another 5 years of enforced ceremony and wayang.
PAP govt wins a battle but loses the war. Even the Malays felt condescended.
Backlash will return at the GE.
......... President that is not elected but doing work of an elected president is still considered an elected president.
Can't wait for this to be heard. It will be a massive set of gymnastics to clear the logic if the courts agree with AG. Tan Cheng Bock and whoever advised him waited for the PAP to complete digging the hole before they stepped in legally.
I think we have gone past the stage for any substantial inroads into changes for the better. Pyrrhic victories on small issues with a bit of egg on the face keeps the heart beating. I am sure that Tan Cheng Bock is fully aware that the PE is a hollow post but like the 37% victory of a former cabinet minister and DPM it is to embarrass the govt.
It is better for him to sue in JB.
Zikapore is a strange place to sue. There being in a polling station is not considered in the Vicinity of a polling station. How ?
Do you think that the son is trying to ring fence the EP from TCB to prevent him from disrupting the new fledgling Cabinet and to gain time to assure that they can get to sit properly in their posts?
Explains why they are so desperate to steam roll it and get the EP under their belts.
Do you think that the son is trying to ring fence the EP from TCB to prevent him from disrupting the new fledgling Cabinet and to gain time to assure that they can get to sit properly in their posts?
Explains why they are so desperate to steam roll it and get the EP under their belts.
Do you think that the son is trying to ring fence the EP from TCB to prevent him from disrupting the new fledgling Cabinet and to gain time to assure that they can get to sit properly in their posts?
Explains why they are so desperate to steam roll it and get the EP under their belts.
So, who is this Lord Pannick?
The Right Honourable Lord Pannick
The Right Honourable Lord Pannick is one of UK’s most highly regarded Queen’s Counsel, who specialises in Public law & Human Rights. He is also an independent member of British House of Lords. In the House of Lords, he was a member of the Constitution Committee for four years.
Recognised as one of the “stars at the bar” for his handling of high-level cases in UK and international law, Lord Pannick appeared in some 100 cases in the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords (before it was replaced by UK’s new Supreme Court). He has argued more than 25 cases in the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg and over 30 cases in the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. His long list of appearances before the highest appellate courts in the UK and Europe is almost second to none.Graduated from Oxford, Lord Pannick was ranked as one of Chambers UK’s Top Silk Bar 100 in 2013. The Chambers UK, a British legal guide said of him, “Without question, he’s superb. He’s a man of great intellect who can turn his hand to almost anything.”
The Times Law 100 also listed him as one of the most influential lawyers in UK and ranked him in 10th place. A judge said, “Lord Pannick is one of the country’s most powerful advocates.”
Some of his notable clients include:
The Queen – winning an injunction in the High Court to restrain The Daily Mirror from publishing further allegations about her home life by a reporter who had gained employment as a footman.
* The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia – in establishing in the House of Lords that state immunity applies to claims alleging torture.
Princess Diana – advised on an employment tribunal case.
Greece govt – resisting the claim brought by former King Constantine for the return of property.
Cyprus govt – in relation to human rights abuses by Turkey in Northern Cyprus.
UK govt – in establishing that MPs accused of dishonestly claiming expenses were not entitled to the benefit of parliamentary privilege.
BBC – defending BBC that it had committed the criminal offence of blasphemy by broadcasting “Jerry Springer – The Opera” (following the judgment, Parliament decided to abolish the criminal offence of blasphemy in UK).
Last year, in the most famous case in UK, Lord Pannick successfully represented a citizen against the State to require the approval of Parliament before the Prime Minister could initiate “Brexit” from EU.Internationally, he has also appeared in a large number of cases in courts outside of UK: Hong Kong, Brunei, the Cayman Islands, Trinidad and Tobago, Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands and Gibraltar. In Hong Kong, he has appeared in some 15 cases in the Court of Final Appeal, many of them on major constitutional and public law issues.
He became an Honorary Fellow at Oxford in September 2004. He writes a fortnightly column on legal matters for UK’s Times, and is the co-author of “Human Rights Law and Practice”, an important textbook used by many universities on Human Rights Law.
It would certainly be interesting to read Lord Pannick’s legal view on why President Wee should not be counted as the first Elected President of Singapore and why section 22 of Presidential Elections (Amendment) Act is “unconstitutional”.
I think we have gone past the stage for any substantial inroads into changes for the better. Pyrrhic victories on small issues with a bit of egg on the face keeps the heart beating. I am sure that Tan Cheng Bock is fully aware that the PE is a hollow post but like the 37% victory of a former cabinet minister and DPM it is to embarrass the govt.