• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Super Rich Mega Churches Declare Assets to Who?

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Just like the Papayas claiming that declaring assets to Ass Loon only is good enuff? Who are they trying to kid?

<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>Measures already in place, says church
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->I REFER to Thursday's report, 'Charities review of seven religious groups'.
The article reported that New Creation Church (NCC) 'spokesman Matthew Kang said that as a result of the review, (Senior) Pastor Joseph Prince will not take part in discussions or vote in instances where there is a potential conflict of interest'. This quote is factually inaccurate.
NCC already has a conflict-of-interest practice. In fact, this practice and alternative checks and balances were already in place in NCC even before the Commissioner of Charities (COC) review. They did not occur 'as a result of the review'.
All along, our chairman has abstained from discussions and voting in the event of any conflict of interest, actual, perceived or otherwise. In fact, all other council members have also practised this.
In addition, before the COC review, our church's key management personnel had already practised an annual declaration of interests (positions and shares held) in organisations or businesses. Our key management personnel include council members, pastors and divisional managers. This same policy has been formalised and extended to all staff as well, after the COC review.
The article also addresses the general issue of loans to subsidiaries and related parties. Specific groups were not named but we wish to reiterate and assure our congregation members that NCC does not face this issue as we do not have loans owing from our subsidiaries and related parties.
As a church, we see this governance review initiated by the COC as a health check and we have truly benefited and learnt from it.
We believe corporate governance is not a means to an end, but an avenue by which we remain excellent and honourable.
Moving forward, we will stay vigilant and remain accountable as an organisation. We will implement what we have learnt from the findings, and continue to maintain our close working relationship with the COC's office and our external auditor, who will continue to guide us.
We will continue to remain transparent and accountable to our 17,000 church members who are our stakeholders. The outcome of this review will give our church members the continued confidence that things have all along been done properly.

How? Be declaring assets within the Familee?
Matthew Kang
Honorary Secretary
Church Council
New Creation Church
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
http://www.ship-of-fools.com/mystery/2008/1586.html

<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=450 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=head_red_140 vAlign=top align=left>1586: New Creation, Singapore</TD></TR><TR><TD vAlign=top align=left>
spacer_10.gif
</TD></TR><TR><TD vAlign=top align=left>
singapore_new_creation_1.jpg
</TD></TR><TR><TD vAlign=top align=left>
spacer_10.gif
</TD></TR><TR><TD vAlign=top align=left>Mystery Worshipper: Whoopedoo.
The church: New Creation, Singapore.
Denomination: Independent. They are a member of the National Council of Churches of Singapore.
The building: The church was founded in 1984 but has never had its own land or building. Since 1999 they have rented space in Suntec City Mall and the connected convention centre for their services. Their venue is named "The Rock" and unless you wander into it and notice the Christian bookstore inside, you would mistake it for a disco or club.
The church: This is the second largest church in Singapore, claiming an attendance of over 20,000 just the Sunday before I visited it. There are four English language services, one in Mandarin, and one in the Hokkien dialect. Their many ministries and outreaches are all described on their website.
The neighbourhood: Suntec City Mall consists of five buildings plus a convention centre built according to the ancient Chinese concept of feng shui, which involves the positioning of objects to achieve a positive influence on people. At the centre of the mall is the Fountain of Wealth, claimed to be the largest fountain in the world (although the claim has been disputed, and rather than take sides Guinness World Records has removed the category). This being one of the largest malls in Singapore, it is extremely busy on weekends, especially when there is a popular exhibition or convention in progress. There is a cineplex right beside the church’s auditorium and a hypermarket on the floors below.
The cast: Deacon Matthew Kang began the service. A young lady identified only as Angie was the worship leader, and the speaker was Pastor Joseph Prince, senior pastor. Angie wore a cap and reminded me of an 80s Cyndi Lauper, the American singer, songwriter and actress.
The date & time: 29 June 2008, 9.00am.

What was the name of the service?
English Sunday Service.

How full was the building?
The Rock seats 1400 people. We arrived 35 minutes early and it was already standing room only! Our names were added to a queue for seating as it became available. A number of other rooms were set up with a video feed to accommodate the overflow crowd (as they would have to, if their claim of an attendance of 20,000 is accurate).

Did anyone welcome you personally?
Entering the church was akin to attending a concert or exclusive nightspot in town. Smartly uniformed bouncers – oops, I mean ushers – wearing wireless earpieces were stationed at the entrance, along with uniformed security guards from CISCO, the oldest and most widely used of five auxiliary police forces authorised to provide armed security at events in Singapore. We entered at the wrong side of the queue ribbon and were asked where we were going. We answered that we were new and weren't sure of where to go. An usher explained that we could stand in the auditorium or go to one of the overflow rooms. When we opted for the former, he led us personally to the proper door. Another usher there said, "Welcome to church" and handed us a four-page notice packet.

Was your pew comfortable?
Since we were standing, we were given cushions in case we wished to sit on the floor. From that vantage point, all we could do was look at the LCD TV screens on the pillar. Some people who were seated left about 10 minutes before the end of the service, so we did get to try out the chairs even if only for a brief moment. They were imported from the Spanish firm of Ezcaray Internacional, maker of customized seating for theatres, auditoriums and performing art centres. I felt that they were the most comfortable church chairs I’ve ever sat in. I was half-expecting cup holders next to them.

How would you describe the pre-service atmosphere?
Though all the seats were taken, the auditorium was practically empty! People had come early to reserve seats by placing Bibles, handbags or other objects on them and then head off for breakfast. Of the people already there, I saw around a dozen engrossed in reading the morning papers. Just a few minutes before the service started, people streamed into the auditorium to take their reserved seats. Not very far from where I was standing were four empty seats that remained "reserved" for the entire service – the people who had claimed them never showed up!

What were the exact opening words of the service?
"Good morning, church! Praise the Lord. God is good all the time – and all the time God is good."

What books did the congregation use during the service?
No books were used. Instead, the song lyrics were superimposed on the camera feed that was projected onto three large screens on top of the stage as well as two LCD TVs hung on the pillars. Copyright information for each song was also displayed at the bottom of the screen. It was like a live karaoke session.

What musical instruments were played?
The band consisted of two keyboardists each with their own double deck of synthesizers, an electric guitar, an acoustic guitar, a bass guitar, a drummer and a percussionist. The worship leader, Angie, was supported by four backup singers and a 50 member choir. Everyone on stage was impeccably dressed. Most of the songs were either Hillsong or written by members of the church's music ministry.

Did anything distract you?
Quite a few of the congregation appeared to be from the middle to higher class of society, wearing very trendy hair styles, makeup, accessories and clothes (some with low necklines). In other words, it was like "Beverly Hills 90210 Goes to Church," where the hip and beautiful get spiritual. The main distraction, though, was waiting for seats to become available. An usher approached several times with single seats to offer, but there were two in my party. Even so, I was sorely tempted to say, "Yes, please" as the usher said, "One single available." The other thing that distracted me was the occasional display of funky graphics on the middle projection screen; they reminded me of a screen saver.

Was the worship stiff-upper-lip, happy clappy, or what?
The worship was like a concert or music video, with the musicians playing like a top-notch band. It began with the usual progression of high tempo praise songs and ended with slower worship songs.

singapore_new_creation_2.jpg




</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Exactly how long was the sermon?
80 minutes. Much too long for my liking.

On a scale of 1-10, how good was the preacher?
8 – Pastor Joseph Prince is a very dynamic speaker and captured our attention despite his digressions. He used a personal tone and pop-culture references to identify with his audience, including things like current TV commercials and movies. I couldn’t get one of his jokes, though, as I don’t watch Singapore TV often. But the sermon meandered and was way too long.

In a nutshell, what was the sermon about?
He began with a recap of the previous week's service and its record attendance. He also talked about how to get leaders to pray over oil so that it can be used as anointing oil. He related how such oil has been used in other churches to bring people out of coma and cause other forms of healing. His sermon proper was based on Jeremiah 23:1-8 (The Lord shall raise up shepherds over his flock); Psalm 23:1-6 ("The Lord is my shepherd; I shall not want..."); and Psalm 78:70-72 (God chose David to be shepherd over Israel). He said that good shepherds lead their sheep and do not beat them.

=> Does this not make the Familee look wolves in sheep clothing?

He then turned to Daniel 9:23-24 ("Seventy sevens" have been granted in which the people must mend their evil ways). He interpreted "seventy sevens" to mean 490 years, a prophetic time interval and the precise time between 31 October 1517 (Reformation Day) and 31 October 2007 (when he preached a particular sermon). Finally he spoke about the grace of God and said that God sees us as beautiful no matter what we think of ourselves. His final text was Song of Solomon 1:5-8 ("I am black but beautiful...").

Which part of the service was like being in heaven?
The sermon was the best part of the service. Pastor Prince made us feel that God really does love us. Writing it down doesn’t do justice to how he put it across.

And which part was like being in... er... the other place?
I didn’t like the irreverent atmosphere before the service, with people reading newspapers and saving seats. It was like waiting for a show to begin instead of coming to the house of God to draw near and pray.

What happened when you hung around after the service looking lost?
An announcement was made that newcomers should go to the visitors centre. We remained in our seats, but after about four minutes an usher approached and asked us to leave so that the next service could enter. We could see that the queue was already about 200 metres long.

How would you describe the after-service coffee?
We found the visitors centre, where a greeter gave us a welcome pack including the two copies of the church’s magazine, a sermon on CD, and some information on care groups and pastoral services. One interesting freebie in the welcome pack was a time limited special offer from Passage New York, an upscale fashion boutique, of a free "little black dress" plus a body scrub or facial at $88 instead of the usual $680 (or $730 for ladies 23 and older). I was also offered (at room temperature) a packet of green tea, chrysanthemum tea, or bottled water.

How would you feel about making this church your regular (where 10 = ecstatic, 0 = terminal)?
8 – The sermon was good, but getting to know the people in church could be a problem. With that many, you don't get to know anyone.

Did the service make you feel glad to be a Christian?
Yes, especially for the message that God sees us as beautiful and loved no matter what we think of ourselves.

What one thing will you remember about all this in seven days' time?
The hip and trendy crowd attending.

=> Ardent PAPee supporters?
 

Jah_rastafar_I

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Careful mr mapakaa talking about NCC is different from talking about CHC. These ppl wun tolerate this type of stuff. They are always in the right. Well i had some of them shout at my dad's relatives from talking to my dad when he was dying.


Anyway i find them more loyal to their church compared to CHC. i expect their attendance to over take CHC.

In the papers their amount gathered was around 50 million , which is like 10 million more than chc's 34 million.
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Careful mr mapakaa talking about NCC is different from talking about CHC. These ppl wun tolerate this type of stuff. They are always in the right. Well i had some of them shout at my dad's relatives from talking to my dad when he was dying.


Anyway i find them more loyal to their church compared to CHC. i expect their attendance to over take CHC.

In the papers their amount gathered was around 50 million , which is like 10 million more than chc's 34 million.

U call this a cult, not a church. :eek:
 

Lestat

Alfrescian
Loyal
When you preach the teachings of GOD, it's a church.

When you preach WHAT YOU DEEM SUITS YOU from the teachings of GOD, it's a cult.
 

myjohnson

Alfrescian
Loyal
Sigh, as if we don't have enough problems already. I just know one thing, that at the end there will be no dreams and no bright light beckoning. It will just be a totally dark and silent void. Not that you will be able to sense it. Think about it when the next time you fall asleep.
 

Jah_rastafar_I

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
When you preach the teachings of GOD, it's a church.

When you preach WHAT YOU DEEM SUITS YOU from the teachings of GOD, it's a cult.

Careful ncc members even more fanatical than CHC's.


I think chc's sun's moves might have turned off some members.


Anyway ncc's pastors preachings sound better than kongy's. Kong's sound a bit stale after a while but then i have been hearing more on kong rather than prince so it's not a fair comparison.
 
Top