• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious ST tells sinkies to take long term view on CECA

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
After slithering here and there for 70% of the article, Ravi Vellor says sinkies' fears of losing jobs as a result
CECA is a valid one but that the surrounding issues "needs to addressed with facts, balanced reasoning, and
above all, empathy."


This could be the statement of the year for the mother of all ironic statements.

a) The govt has not come clean with all the facts; that Tharman said it was not a good agreement (he said it in
India!) for starters.
b) Without facts, it is impossible to have "balanced reasoning" and Ravi did not enlighten either in the full page
article.
c) Empathy!?@^* Empathy for whom? Again, not clear in his intentionally ambiguous article.

What do you think?
 
If you Indians cook less curry and be more hygienic, I probably can accept them more favourably.
 
The last thing we need now is an Ah Neh dog from India who has benefited alot from being a loyal lapdog of the PAP, preaching to daft Sinkies about balanced reasoning and empathy. He can stick Ceca up his Brahmin arse where the sun don't shine
 
Last edited:
After slithering here and there for 70% of the article, Ravi Vellor says sinkies' fears of losing jobs as a result
CECA is a valid one but that the surrounding issues "needs to addressed with facts, balanced reasoning, and
above all, empathy."


This could be the statement of the year for the mother of all ironic statements.

a) The govt has not come clean with all the facts; that Tharman said it was not a good agreement (he said it in
India!) for starters.
b) Without facts, it is impossible to have "balanced reasoning" and Ravi did not enlighten either in the full page
article.
c) Empathy!?@^* Empathy for whom? Again, not clear in his intentionally ambiguous article.

What do you think?
Just to take note that the writer in this so called article is an Ah Neh
 
Your head lah! No food on table where got future still want talk long term? Long term eat kiam chye u want anot? :o-o:
 
long term view on CECA means Sg in 20 years will have Indians as majority race and all good jobs will be filled by Indians
That's true. That's why is important to get a resident status elsewhere outside of Singapore. I also feel that Singapore is enroute to become an Indian infested city.
 
That's true. That's why is important to get a resident status elsewhere outside of Singapore. I also feel that Singapore is enroute to become an Indian infested city.
So where you looking at? You say must be close to Sg leh. Msia? Indonesia? Thailand? Philippines? Vietnam? Laos? Myanmar? Bhutan? China? Korea? Japan? Australia?
 
So where you looking at? You say must be close to Sg leh. Msia? Indonesia? Thailand? Philippines? Vietnam? Laos? Myanmar? Bhutan? China? Korea? Japan? Australia?
Maybe Thailand. Just a long-term nonresident visa will do.
 
Back
Top