- Joined
- Dec 30, 2010
- Messages
- 12,730
- Points
- 113
After slithering here and there for 70% of the article, Ravi Vellor says sinkies' fears of losing jobs as a result
CECA is a valid one but that the surrounding issues "needs to addressed with facts, balanced reasoning, and
above all, empathy."
This could be the statement of the year for the mother of all ironic statements.
a) The govt has not come clean with all the facts; that Tharman said it was not a good agreement (he said it in
India!) for starters.
b) Without facts, it is impossible to have "balanced reasoning" and Ravi did not enlighten either in the full page
article.
c) Empathy!?@^* Empathy for whom? Again, not clear in his intentionally ambiguous article.
What do you think?
CECA is a valid one but that the surrounding issues "needs to addressed with facts, balanced reasoning, and
above all, empathy."
This could be the statement of the year for the mother of all ironic statements.
a) The govt has not come clean with all the facts; that Tharman said it was not a good agreement (he said it in
India!) for starters.
b) Without facts, it is impossible to have "balanced reasoning" and Ravi did not enlighten either in the full page
article.
c) Empathy!?@^* Empathy for whom? Again, not clear in his intentionally ambiguous article.
What do you think?