Not many upper-middle income people can afford a private condo.
Buying a HDB apartment with a HDB loan is still very good option even one is not a owner.
99 years lease more than enough stay. Freehold ownership is just a name to make you feel better staying in private property :p
Never get too obsessed in buying private properties as one may end up losing big money
U are a typical brainwashed sinkie, swallowed too much PAP cum and fucked your brain up that way.
Not many middle income people can afford a private condo? Why is that? Ever ask that question? Or you need it spoon fed to you like a sinkie?
Let me explain to you how it works.
In normal countries, the govt does not own or control 90% of the land. Only communist and socialist countries have this sort of governmental land ownership. In a normal country, a govt or city might build only 5-15% of all residential housing for the lower income and underprivileged people, and these become govt subsidized housing for the poor. In Singapore, the PAP took this original idea under SIT and then later earlier versions of the HDB and mutated it to what it is today. Using the land acquisitions act, they appropriated close to 90% of all land in SIngapore for themselves. Once they became a monopoly, they simply proceeded to build housing for 80% of the population hence forcing all lower, middle and upper middle classes into govt housing. A small percentage of the land is sold to developers at exorbitant prices, with minimum floor prices stipulated during the bid process. Developers have to make a profit too, when they have so little land to work with and with the prices being so high as set by LTA or URA (even though these agencies obtained the land cheap cheap through the land acquisitions act), they have to pass the price on to the end users and hence you have high prices.
Now what would happen if the HDB stuck to its original mandate and build housing just for the lower income people, instead of for 80% of the population? Well, they would only need perhaps 10% of the land, and not 90%. The other 80% would not be acquired under the land requisitions act or any other act. The owners of these 80% of the land will be free to sell it to whoever they want. If a developer approach them, they could sell it to them. If they ask too much, the developer will simply approach other land owners. Why? Because they are lots of them around and they own 80% of the land. The land acquisition price for the developers is therefore much lower. And there are many more competitors with other developers buying land to build too. It works the same for the end products. Lots of developers build condo projects give the people an option and many choices. If one is too expensive, look at another project to buy. There is no balloting of flats, or other devices that the HDB uses to control the buyers. Developers will build some basic flats, some luxury flats and some condos with mid level finishing. This is called a market economy. Right now, all private condos are basically luxury condos.
believe it or not, at one time, the difference between a HDB flat and a private freehold condo was about $110K. Timothy Seow build the first private condo in 1970 at the Beverly Mai. You could buy a condo there for about $150K. A HDB flat in Marine PArade around the same time was about $35K. but as the HDB took over more and more land, developers like Timothy Seow cannot find reasonably price plots to buy and hence the price becomes so high. If the PAP and HDB did not get into the business of making money and ripping citizens off, most of us would be living in private free hold condos costing way less then $ 1 million each. U got it now?