• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

SPORE lawyers have a habit of running away with clients money

†††††

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
1,746
Points
0
Trial of lawyer who fled S'pore with S$5.7m begins
By Shaffiq Alkhatib | Posted: 15 November 2010 2136 hrs

SINGAPORE: A trial involving 42-year-old Tan Cheng Yew, a lawyer who was on the run, began in a district court on Monday. Tan allegedly fled Singapore with some S$5.7 million belonging to his client.

Tan left the country in February 2003 but was caught by German police who arrested him in Munich in June last year.

He was sent back to Singapore on 22 October last year after Germany granted his extradition.

Tan currently faces six charges in all, four for criminal breach of trust and two for cheating. He is believed to have committed the offences between March 2001 and April 2003.

It is currently unknown how many witnesses defence will call. However, prosecution will be calling upon 21 witnesses and it will be proceeding on four charges.

All of them involve businessman, Tan Kwee Khoon and his family members.

Tan Kwee Khoon's family is believed to have entrusted Tan with more than 3.4 million dollars but the accused allegedly converted the monies for his own use.

It is believed he also cheated Mr Tan Khwee Khoon into handing over to him two cheques worth S$1.38 million.

In its opening address, the prosecution, led by Deputy Public Prosecutor Siva Shanmugam said that in April 2001, the Tan family extended a loan of S$1.5 million to the Central Christian Church.

The money was to be used to purchase a piece of land and build a church building. Mr Tan then transferred the money to the church between May and June that year.

As the land had not been tendered for, the lawyer, Tan Cheng Yew, who was acting for the family, allegedly advised them to place the cash under the trust of his law firm and for a loan agreement to be signed.

It is believed another law firm acting for the church, Shanker, Nandwani and Partners then forwarded a cheque for S$1.5 million dated 28 July 2001 to Tan Cheng Yew for him to hold on trust.

However, the accused allegedly deposited the money into his own Fixed Deposit Account after this and pledged it to the bank as security for his personal loan facility.

Then in January 2002, it is believed he deceived Mr Tan into believing it was a legal requirement for debtors to repay the money they had borrowed from the first year of their loan.

However, prosecution said that Mr Tan did not want the church to start making repayments at such an early state. Instead, he was willing to make these repayments on the church's behalf.

It is believed the accused asked Mr Tan to issue him a cheque dated 5 February 2002 for S$480,000.

The accused then allegedly deposited the cheque into his own bank account on the Feb 6 2002.

The court heard that if Mr Tan had known that there were no such legal requirements, he would not have given the cheque to the accused.

The Tan family is also believed to have entrusted an additional S$1.9 million to the accused between March and June 2001.

The accused also allegedly duped Mr Tan into writing out a cheque for S$900,000 which was supposed to be invested with an Australian bank. Instead, it is believed the accused deposited the cheque into his own Fixed Deposit account.

Tan Cheng Yew, who has been in remand since his return to Singapore, is represented by Senior Counsel Michael Khoo.

The hearing, which is scheduled for nine days, continues on Tuesday.

-CNA/ac
 
Your world must really be very very small if you think this happen only in Singapore.
 
Trial of lawyer who fled S'pore with S$5.7m begins
By Shaffiq Alkhatib | Posted: 15 November 2010 2136 hrs

SINGAPORE: A trial involving 42-year-old Tan Cheng Yew, a lawyer who was on the run, began in a district court on Monday. Tan allegedly fled Singapore with some S$5.7 million belonging to his client.
...

Tan Cheng Yew, who has been in remand since his return to Singapore, is represented by Senior Counsel Michael Khoo.

The hearing, which is scheduled for nine days, continues on Tuesday.
-CNA/ac

It was rumoured that in his heydays, Tan Cheng Yew was a high roller in a Macau casino that the casino would send a private jet to Sg to pick him up.
 
is he a good friend of Mr Pah Chew Cheng ?

:D:p
 
svLEEKUAN_narrowweb__300x417,0.jpg

Not me!!!!
 
I don't think there are any measures in place by the law society to prevent such incidents from happening again.

There are lawyers who focus entirely on property conveyancing and charge lower conveyancing costs compared to the "market rate" of other conveyancing lawyers. Mainly because of this stakeholding amount in a property deal.

Imagine a 1 million house and he holds this 10% as stakeholder for completion. That is a $100K for 3 months for the lawyer to hold. Imagine what some lawyers do with this money. Not to even talk about the conveyancing deals they handle.

So don't see those small conveyancing law firms, look small small from the outside, but the amount of money they hold is amazing.

In recent years,
We have Rasif who ran away, Zul Amin who also ran away and this 2 will not be the last.
 
His brother is Dean of Law Faculty NUS. Worth watching his sentence when he is convicted.
 
Can't the authorities set up a 3rd party escrow service. So all this $ is held by this service and access to $ requires both lawyer and client. Quite a simple solution. Make it a law such that amounts above $50k or $100K be required to use the escrow service.

Have a nominal service charge for this service.
 
Bingo.

The most prominent law firm and lawyer in conveyancing is Lee and Lee and the old man's wife. The firm is now run by her niece, Kwa Kim Lee. The amount kept in that firms generates a huge amount while it kept in their account. This is allowed by law.




Can't the authorities set up a 3rd party escrow service. So all this $ is held by this service and access to $ requires both lawyer and client. Quite a simple solution. Make it a law such that amounts above $50k or $100K be required to use the escrow service.

Have a nominal service charge for this service.
 
It was rumoured that in his heydays, Tan Cheng Yew was a high roller in a Macau casino that the casino would send a private jet to Sg to pick him up.

Almost all high rollers end up losing big time. Tan Cheng Yew isn't the first and won't be the last. Just wondering if the Tan Kwee Khoon chap is brother of Tan Soo Khoon, ex-Speaker of Parliament.
 
They can impose such a requirement on firms with a smaller paid up capital or partnership equity.

Lee and Lee is going to make good a $5M or even $10M loss should one of its partners making off with the $. I think they probably even have some form of umbrella liability coverage. But the small 2 partner firm may only have $200K in partner's equity barely enough to cover 1 property transaction.

Best bet would be to have escrow service. As we attract more HMW to Singapore we are going to see more cases of lawyers running off with the $. Pretty silly.

Actually by not having such a service, the rich would prefer their matters to be managed by the larger firms.

Bingo.

The most prominent law firm and lawyer in conveyancing is Lee and Lee and the old man's wife. The firm is now run by her niece, Kwa Kim Lee. The amount kept in that firms generates a huge amount while it kept in their account. This is allowed by law.
 
You missed my point. An escrow is the obvious answer. They won't do it because the most powerful firm drawing significant amount in interest is lost.




They can impose such a requirement on firms with a smaller paid up capital or partnership equity.

Lee and Lee is going to make good a $5M or even $10M loss should one of its partners making off with the $. I think they probably even have some form of umbrella liability coverage. But the small 2 partner firm may only have $200K in partner's equity barely enough to cover 1 property transaction.

Best bet would be to have escrow service. As we attract more HMW to Singapore we are going to see more cases of lawyers running off with the $. Pretty silly.

Actually by not having such a service, the rich would prefer their matters to be managed by the larger firms.
 
Tan chap not smart despite being a lawyer. Why hide in Germany? He failed to do proper research. Should have headed for Holland or Denmark, Maybe he is a fan of Bayern Munich instead of Ajax or FC Copenhagen.

Compared with David Razif, Tan no match, that's why got caught. Others on-the-run for decades also avoided detection and arrest. Perhaps Tan wasn't street-smart. Ex-lawyer Loo Choon Beng aka 'tuapui Loo" also wanted but smart enough or well-connected enough.
 
My point is that these recent events have proven that MM LKY's theory that High salary prevents corruption is toatally bankrupt,and should be assigned to the dustbin,just like his other hugely propagated theory of Asian Values.

Tan Cheng Yew,a top debator,must be earning a respectable income,whilst not to the level of 3 million+,but high compared to many other local(citizens) professionals in Singapore.

He came fr such a wonderful family,most would be tempted to comment that he has indeed chosen the right HOLE.

But what happens,and it is not only Mr.Tan Cheng Yew.

Money is never enough(for majority anyway),when you have 1 million,you want 10 millions,when u have 10 millions,u want 100 millions,when u have 100.00 millions,u want 1 billion,etc,etc

MM LKY is wrong and he sets so many of these "enlightened" policies in Singapoer and even promote them to the world.

Does MM LKY has that special gift that he knows how to distingish those special breed who are the prople who dislike money?I dont think so!
 
My point is that these recent events have proven that MM LKY's theory that High salary prevents corruption is toatally bankrupt,and should be assigned to the dustbin,just like his other hugely propagated theory of Asian Values.

Tan Cheng Yew,a top debator,must be earning a respectable income,whilst not to the level of 3 million+,but high compared to many other local(citizens) professionals in Singapore.

He came fr such a wonderful family,most would be tempted to comment that he has indeed chosen the right HOLE.

But what happens,and it is not only Mr.Tan Cheng Yew.

Money is never enough(for majority anyway),when you have 1 million,you want 10 millions,when u have 10 millions,u want 100 millions,when u have 100.00 millions,u want 1 billion,etc,etc

MM LKY is wrong and he sets so many of these "enlightened" policies in Singapoer and even promote them to the world.

Does MM LKY has that special gift that he knows how to distingish those special breed who are the prople who dislike money?I dont think so!

Absolutely right, bro. I suspect even those in IMH love money too. Women included. I opine loving money is still acceptable. Problem comes when some people are obsessed with money and power.
 

Longer jail term for lawyer who misappropriated clients' money


By Claire Huang | Posted: 30 November 2012 1453 hrs

SINGAPORE: The High Court has imposed a longer imprisonment term for disgraced lawyer Tan Cheng Yew, who misappropriated S$4.82 million of his clients' money.

Tan now has to serve 12 years' jail instead of the original nine.

Tan was on the run for six years after he misappropriated the money.

He was arrested in Munich, Germany, in 2009 and extradited to Singapore.

The public prosecutor told Justice Lee Seiu Kin that the highest sentence was six years, where a lawyer absconded with close to S$2 million.

DPP Tan Ken Hwee said in Tan Cheng Yew's case, the sentence of nine years' jail "was manifestly inadequate".

In making his judgement, Justice Lee said as an advocate of law, a lawyer is granted exclusive rights and trust.

He said the court will not hesitate to impose a strong sentence in this case.

- CNA/xq


 
The days of lawyer earning big bucks are over. Only a few with PAP ties are able to earn enviable income.
 
The days of lawyer earning big bucks are over. Only a few with PAP ties are able to earn enviable income.

This is very true. Now, any kind of shit job the lawyers also take up and I'm waiting for the time when I can call a female lawyer moonshining. Any lobang?
 
Back
Top