- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
- Messages
- 64,816
- Points
- 113
Most of norwegian companies are state controlled. Much like singapore.competing unfairly in domestic market.
So Singapore is socialist too?
Most of norwegian companies are state controlled. Much like singapore.competing unfairly in domestic market.
Its state controlled business environment .its not even capitalism.So Singapore is socialist too?
Its state controlled business environment .its not even capitalism.
That is why we need to unite behind the PAP and reject the divisive politics wrought by the oppies! Government how to be strong if weakened by internal conflicts you tell me? Vote. Them. Out!The problem with laissez faire capitalism -- which is the opposite extreme -- is that governments have crafted it as socialism for the rich, rather than as true, equal opportunity competition without fear or favour.
Rather than debating between two extremes, one should find the middle ground. This needs strong and sound government, not strong corporations or even strong democracy.
To answer that question, ask yourself if CPF is de facto your own money?So Singapore is socialist too?
“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.” - Margaret Thatcher
“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.” - Margaret Thatcher
Most of norwegian companies are state controlled. Much like singapore.competing unfairly in domestic market.
Since those who pay taxes contribute to the country, maybe a new form of democracy should be introduced based on the amount of personal tax the person pay.
If say, you pay nothing, you get no vote. If you pay a million, you get a million votes. Its an incentive for the rich to pay taxes otherwise if based on one man one vote, the non tax payers will normally choose leaders that are incompatible with creating wealth.
To answer that question, ask yourself if CPF is de facto your own money?![]()
If you bought 2 houses, you must have sold at least once. Where the money go?It certainly is because
1. I used it to buy two houses that were in my name.
2. I have withdrawn more than half a million dollars since I turned 55. I still have a few hundred thousand available to me to withdraw if I need it.
Finland has this basic income programme for the unemployed which boost vonfidence and help them look for work and get jobs.but that experiment will end soon.
Finnish economy has least gahmen intervention.
If you bought 2 houses, you must have sold at least once. Where the money go?![]()
The USA has a comfortable safety net for the disadvantaged and is therefore a social democracy.Social democracy is the way to go ...not communism, not unfettered capitalism, not socialism.
Both times you sell all moneys go back to cpf. You sell the second one where you gonna stay? Now no more 55 it is 70, 65 if you make the effort to opt out. Smelly or not you tell me? I be worried if I were you. GIC temasek belly up maybe not even get back 5 cents to the dollar.I sold both houses. The CPF money was returned with interest because I had not reached the age of 55 at the time. The profit of more than $700,000 went straight to my bank account.
When I reached 55 I withdrew the rest.
It felt like it was mine, I could use it to buy property as if it were mine. I could help myself to it when I turned 55. I have therefore concluded that it was mine.
Both times you sell all moneys go back to cpf. You sell the second one where you gonna stay? Now no more 55 it is 70, 65 if you make the effort to opt out. Smelly or not you tell me? I be worried if I were you. GIC temasek belly up maybe not even get back 5 cents to the dollar.![]()