Small time influencer Rachel Wong is a filthy slut whore, whoever she is.

[LordElrond]

Most of the time we imagine sluts as female who show half their boobs or asses with heavy make up. Now, this Rachel Wong is a real life slut. The thought of her wanting to eat men is such a turn on.

 

[ginfreely]

From my uncle's understanding is something similar to gansiokbin case whereby gansiokbin the plantiff wanted to bring to court some leefendents for insulting her as whore but gansiokbin was unable to do so becas there were too many leefendents I.e the world .

No thanks to Malaysian criminal syndicate and you losers cock suckers of Malaysian criminal syndicate spamming evil filthy lies of Gansiokbin a virgin with annulled marriage being slut whore mistress View attachment 151169

 

[Cottonmouth]

No thanks to Malaysian criminal syndicate and you losers cock suckers of Malaysian criminal syndicate spamming evil filthy lies of Gansiokbin a virgin with annulled marriage being slut whore mistress View attachment 151169

Nobody believes your fake virginity, one look can tell you have been fucked many rounds.

 

[ginfreely]

Nobody believes your fake virginity, one look can tell you have been fucked many rounds.

Fake is you Jeremy Quek busted 造假失败贱货faker of evidence after being exposed part of Malaysian criminal syndicate network aka their cheap whore cock sucker. Pui! View attachment 151173

 

[Scrooball (clone)]

Pls la, 40k followers = celebrity? She’s not even an ant!

 

[Scrooball (clone)]

Lol…. The lawyer Clarence Lun acting for Rachel Wong.

https://www.elitigation.sg/gd/s/2022_SGHC_151

10 Mr Lun’s main argument is that the plaintiff had already sworn on oath that she does not have the documents in her power, custody, or control. Mr Lun’s submission is not an adequate one. It is not enough to say that the plaintiff does not have the kind of entries that the defendant is seeking in her diary (or diaries). The defendant wants to see what is in the diaries during the relevant period. The plaintiff has to produce the diaries and not just say that the diaries are blank.

 

[Cottonmouth]

Influencer accused of infidelity fails to stop court order for correspondence with 2 men​

photo_librarySee 4 More Photoschevron_rightchevron_left


Posted on 04 July 2022 | 2,474 views | 2 comments
Dominic Low
The Straits Times
July 2, 2022
A social media influencer has failed in her legal bid to stop another woman from obtaining correspondence between her and two men she is accused of being intimate with.
The influencer, Ms Rachel Wong, had appealed against a State Courts' order to provide such documents to Ms Olivia Wu, whom she is suing for defamation.
But High Court judge Choo Han Teck dismissed the appeal in a judgment on Tuesday (June 28), holding that the information sought by Ms Wu to bolster her defence had been proven by her to be relevant and material for the lawsuit.
The court's decision is the latest development in the ongoing lawsuit between the two women, which involves several stories posted by Ms Wu on her Instagram account in December 2020.
Titled "Cheater of 2020", the stories suggested that Ms Wong had been unfaithful to her former husband Anders Aplin.
Court documents did not spell out the relationship between Ms Wu and Ms Wong.
Ms Wu, a part-time nurse who works in a pharmaceutical company, is reportedly acquainted with Mr Aplin's current girlfriend.
The stories were published while Ms Wong's marriage with Mr Aplin, who is a footballer here, was undergoing annulment proceedings.
They were married in December 2019, but their marriage was legally annulled around March last year. The annulment proceedings started in April 2020.
Ms Wong later sued Ms Wu, claiming that the stories had caused her to suffer damage to her social media reputation and image, on which she was largely dependent "to attract and obtain business deals on partnerships" to earn a living.
The influencer argued that the stories - when read together with their title - meant that she had sex with her wedding emcee, Mr Alan Wan, on her wedding night and that she was promiscuous, among other things.
In her defence, Ms Wu claimed that the stories were true and that Ms Wong had been "more than intimate" with at least two men while she was in a romantic relationship with Mr Aplin: her gym trainer - a Mr Han - and Mr Wan.
To support her case, she applied for a court order to obtain correspondence between Ms Wong and the two men. She also sought Ms Wong's diary entries relating to Mr Wan.
State Courts deputy registrar Lewis Tan allowed the application, and Ms Wong later appealed to the High Court against the decision.
In his judgment on Tuesday, Justice Choo noted that Ms Wu's lawyer Gerard Quek had submitted to the court photocopies of text messages depicting "lurid details" from a person named Chen Xuan Han. These messages did not show their recipient.
Mr Quek had also produced a copy of a journal entry purportedly from Ms Wong professing her love for Mr Wan, along with a photograph of the influencer lying on a man's chest - allegedly the wedding emcee.
"From the exhibits that the defendant has produced, there is reason to believe that similar other entries may be found," said Justice Choo.
"And if the diaries are produced but no such entries are found, then surely that should strengthen the plaintiff's case at trial."
He noted an argument by Ms Wong's lawyer Clarence Lun that Ms Wu was on a "fishing expedition" in the hope of finding any useful documents to bolster her case.
"In this case, samples of relevant material had been produced and, just to extend the fishing analogy just a bit more, it is not a mere fishing expedition if fish has in fact been spotted," he said.
Justice Choo also disagreed with Ms Wong that Ms Wu's application for the court order was scandalous and vexatious.
The correspondence sought may be proven to be scandalous, but only because of the nature of the subject matter of the defamation, he said.
Justice Choo said the narrative in Ms Wong's case was unclear.
"By a combination of Instagram-speak and the utter failure of counsel to translate that into English, (Ms Wong's) statement of claim is filled with chaff," he said.
The judge also noted Ms Wong's description of her Instagram account having 41,400 followers.
"That, I suppose, entitles her, in her estimation, to be a celebrity," he said.

 

[Cottonmouth]

Rachel Wong is just a fucking cheebye public toilet slut who needs to do the Walk of Shame and have her pussy flogged 69 times in public!

 

[poore]

damn xia suay now

 

[Cottonmouth]

Fucking toilet bowl cheebye slut Rachel Wong.
You can assume every guy in the same photo has taken a piss in her filthy hole.

 

[Eisenhut]

Dark skin coolie gene singkee bu is a disgrace to her singkee 18 generation of ancestors.

Should have change her name to m&d name since she is so dark skin

 

[Cottonmouth]

Dark skin coolie gene singkee bu is a disgrace to her singkee 18 generation of ancestors.

Should have change her name to m&d name since she is so dark skin

She looks like a cross bred pinoy slut.
Lau Wong must have fucked the family maid and she crawl out from a pinay cunt to get that half shit tone.

Pinays are quite slutty and this Rachel is a slut, she takes after the maid mother.

 

[mahjongking]

cant imagine there are imbeciles who follows this female dog

 

[zeddy]

This is Rachel is really a slut whore of a public toilet. Her ex hubby that national footballer is quite Yandao and is a former commando. To think that a Yandao like him also kena green hat is really mind baffling.

 

[LexLuthor]

This is Rachel is really a slut whore of a public toilet. Her ex hubby that national footballer is quite Yandao and is a former commando. To think that a Yandao like him also kena green hat is really mind baffling.

He commando wore red beret, but wife upgraded him to green beret lah.

He can take it one.

 

[Cottonmouth]

He commando wore red beret, but wife upgraded him to green beret lah.

He can take it one.

He should open her durian with his bare hands, tear off both labias.

 

[Cottonmouth]

Rachel Wong that filthy slut fucked by this guy on her wedding day, this is the kind of dirtiest whore who should have her cheebye cut off and fed to dogs.

Ex-TVB actor Alan Wan & friends accused of not adhering to safe distancing measures in Zouk S'pore​

A reader who claims to have witnessed the scene tipped off Shin Min Daily News.
Karen Lui |

January 23, 2021, 12:41 PM

Follow us on Telegram for the latest updates: https://t.me/mothershipsg

Since October 2020, Zouk has repurposed its dance floor for other uses to stay in business during the pandemic.


But the venue is now under the spotlight for a different reason, after Shin Min Daily News received a tip-off from a reader.
The 45-year-old reader, who was identified only as Huang, said that he had witnessed ex-TVB actor Alan Wan and friends partying at Zouk Cinema Club.
Huang claimed that the group had allegedly disregarded safe distancing measures in the nightclub.
According to the Chinese daily, videos uploaded on Instagram showed that Wan and his friends attended a movie screening of "A Star is Born" on the night of Jan. 14.
The videos are no longer available for viewing.

Photo via Zouk

What allegedly happened​

At the start, everyone who entered the venue were wearing masks, Shin Min reported.
The guests were seated in separate groups, and maintained a safe distance.
However, at the end of the screening, the background music became fast-paced nightclub music, and the guests started dancing along to it.
As one of Wan's friends who were present, fellow actor Ky Tan, allegedly gave his female companion a lap dance in a video that was recorded and uploaded to Instagram.
Although the headcount did not exceed eight in the video, the people who were present were not wearing masks.
Huang expressed his anger at this scene, "How could they upload such footage of irresponsible behaviour onto the Internet? I don't understand, are they showing off?"

Screenshot via Shin Min Daily News

Screenshot via Shin Min Daily News

Zouk Cinema Club's response​

In response to queries Shin Min, a spokesperson from Zouk said that the videos do not accurately reflect what went on at the scene.
The club also emphasised on their safe distancing measures.
Mothership has reached out to Zouk for more information but did not receive a reply by press time.

Ex-TVB artiste now based in Singapore​

Last year, Wan announced his departure from Hong Kong broadcasting company TVB after ten years, as well as his plans to move to Singapore.



In 2017, Wan was part of the cast of English television series, "Faculty" and mostly recently played the role of Harry in award-winning series, "Last Madame" that stars Joanne Peh.
Tan was also part of the cast of "Last Madam" as Guo Wen.

 

[Cottonmouth]

Such an itchy slut like Rachel Wong needs to be spread wide and flogged 69 times until her cheebye swollen.

 

[Cottonmouth]

Fake is you Jeremy Quek busted 造假失败贱货faker of evidence after being exposed part of Malaysian criminal syndicate network aka their cheap whore cock sucker. Pui!

Rachel Wong is a case of a SLUT WHORE pretending to be pious, just like you, a fucking cheebye slut whore.

 

[Pinkieslut]

'Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned': Woman loses negligence lawsuit against psychiatrist ex-lover​

Ms Serene Tiong (left) accused her former lover, Dr Chan Herng Nieng (right), of medical negligence and intentionally inflicting emotional distress. A High Court judge dismissed her claims.
Published July 19, 2022
Updated July 19, 2022
SINGAPORE — A woman who had an extramarital affair with her psychiatrist has failed in her lawsuit against him, after she sued him for negligence for allegedly getting her addicted to pills to manage her anxiety.
High Court judge Tan Siong Thye on Tuesday (July 19) described Ms Serene Tiong Sze Yin’s suit as her “latest episode in her plot for revenge” against Dr Chan Herng Nieng.
In dismissing Ms Tiong's claims for S$250,000 in damages for medical negligence and intentional infliction of emotional distress, Justice Tan found her testimony to be highly unreliable and that her claims were an abuse of process.
Tuesday’s ruling was the latest in a string of legal disputes arising from Ms Tiong’s affair with Dr Chan.
Ms Tiong, a senior business development manager at Precious Medical Centre, and Dr Chan started their affair in January 2017. She was still married while he was not.

Read also​

Dr Chan, who runs his own private practice at Capital Mindhealth Clinic, gave Ms Tiong Xanax tablets for her anxiety during their relationship.
The pair broke up around May 2018 after Ms Tiong found explicit WhatsApp messages between Dr Chan and his close friend, colorectal surgeon Julian Ong. Both doctors boasted about their sexual exploits with other married women.
Ms Tiong lodged a complaint with the Singapore Medical Council (SMC) and emailed her complaint to other doctors, writing that Dr Chan and Dr Ong were colluding to take advantage of vulnerable female patients.
Dr Ong then sued her for defamation. He lost and lodged an appeal with the High Court.
In October 2020, High Court judge See Kee Oon found that both men did not collude to take sexual advantage of Ms Tiong, but said they could have come together to target a female patient of Dr Ong’s.
Despite ruling in Dr Ong’s favour, Justice See cautioned that he and Dr Chan had “no moral victory” to claim and chided them for their blatant treatment of women as sex objects.

Read also​

Justice Tan echoed this on Tuesday, writing in his 104-page grounds of decision that Dr Chan’s exploitation of Ms Tiong and other women “for his own perverse desires is debauched, degenerate and highly deserving of censure”.
The judge added that there was "no true winner" in the long-running saga.

Julian Ong Endoscopy & SurgeryDr Julian Ong Kian Peng, who runs Julian Ong Endoscopy & Surgery at Mount Elizabeth Novena Specialist Centre.

CHANGED EVIDENCE TO FIT HER CASE​

In her current negligence lawsuit against Dr Chan, Ms Tiong claimed that he gave her an addictive drug and that he told her he was committed to a long-term and exclusive sexual relationship with her.
She also alleged that she suffered a “mental and emotional breakdown” when she discovered his relationships with other women.
She argued that as her de facto doctor, Dr Chan owed her a duty of care to ensure she would not become addicted to Xanax.
Ms Tiong also claimed to have suffered side effects from the alleged high dosages of drugs given to her, which was evident in how she confronted him at his clinic in front of staff and patients in June 2018.

Read also​

In his defence, Dr Chan argued that other psychiatrists continued to prescribe Xanax to Ms Tiong after they broke up and their communications did not support her assertion that she suffered side effects from taking the drug.
The key issues during the trial included how many tablets Dr Chan had given to Ms Tiong and how frequently he gave her the tablets.
She asserted that he gave her 280 or 330 tablets from February 2017 to May 2018, while he said he only gave her 14 tablets for short-term use in May 2018.
Justice Tan found Dr Chan’s version of events to be more credible, ruling that Ms Tiong’s evidence on this “crucial pillar” of the case was “gravely inconsistent and irreconcilable”.
Ms Tiong “vacillated repeatedly” on how many Xanax tablets Dr Chan gave her, Justice Tan found. Contemporaneous records from Singapore General Hospital also refuted her claim that Dr Chan gave her 160 tablets from May 2017 to March 2018.
Ms Tiong later claimed that these inconsistencies were due to memory impairment or loss due to her Xanax consumption.

Read also​

Justice Tan described this explanation as a “double-edged sword” because it suggested that her recollection of events and court testimony were unreliable.
Given that the number of Xanax tablets was the heart of her claim for medical negligence, the judge said her conflicting evidence proved fatal and spoke volumes about her reliability as witness.
Justice Tan wrote: "At one point, Ms Tiong herself seemed aware of the persistently conflicting nature of her evidence, agreeing during cross-examination that she was re-engineering her evidence on the quantity of Xanax to fit her case.”

NO BREACH OF CARE​

Justice Tan then found that as a result, Dr Chan did not breach his duty of care to Ms Tiong. The judge also rubbished her claim that she suffered from Xanax dependency.
Another medical expert testified that the risk of physical dependency on the drug was very low, even if Dr Chan had prescribed the highest quantity of Xanax — about two to three tablets a week from February 2017 to March 2018.
The expert further refuted Ms Tiong’s claims that she suffered adverse side effects after more than a year of consuming Xanax. The expert said such side effects would last only four to five hours.
Justice Tan also accepted Dr Chan’s lawyers’ argument that in any case, no reasonable psychiatrist would have continued prescribing the drug to her if she had side effects.
Meanwhile, the judge noted that Ms Tiong was willing to continue a long-term relationship with Dr Chan if he pledged to marry her.
This meant the harm she purportedly suffered from realising he did not intend to have a long-term, exclusive relationship with her was, at best, minimal, said Justice Tan.
As for the quantum of losses, the judge said Ms Tiong’s lawyer belatedly raised that Dr Chan was liable for S$250,000 worth of damages, on the basis that she requires lifelong treatment for Xanax addiction.
Justice Tan said that she had failed to prove that she suffered harm of this amount as a result of Dr Chan’s prescription.
He added that the case should not have been heard in the High Court, which has a minimum civil jurisdiction of S$250,000.

NO TRUE WINNER​

The High Court judge also agreed with the Court of Appeal’s findings in August 2020 that she was “clearly on a quest for revenge”.
The apex court had dismissed her lawsuit against the chief executive of HC Surgical Specialists for breaching his duties as a company director by acquiring a stake in Dr Ong’s private clinic.
Justice Tan wrote: “In my view, Ms Tiong displayed a willing readiness to compromise the court process for her own personal vendetta… She even admitted that she had not calculated the precise number of Xanax tablets provided to her before filing her claim for medical negligence and only did so the night before the third day of the trial.
“The final death knell came when Ms Tiong affirmed that she would not have commenced the present suit if she were in a relationship with Dr Chan.”
Nevertheless, this did not excuse or vindicate Dr Chan’s behaviour, Justice Tan said.
The psychiatrist is currently appealing against a decision by the SMC to suspend him from medical practice for five months from February this year.
Justice Tan said: “Dr Chan’s disgraceful use of women including Ms Tiong as his sex objects and the disturbing pride with which he gloated about his sexual conquests in the WhatsApp exchanges with Dr Ong suggest that he is a person with serious and grave character defects.
“Dr Chan’s conduct in exploiting Ms Tiong and other women for his own perverse desires is debauched, degenerate and highly deserving of censure.”
The judge added: “Indeed, the adage that hell hath no fury like a woman scorned best describes the vitriolic actions of Ms Tiong. This case is the latest episode in Ms Tiong’s plot for revenge against the one who spurned her.”
When Dr Chan wanted to end the relationship, Ms Tiong had demanded a branded Cartier watch and S$150,000 from Dr Chan. He then reported her to the police for extortion.
The police issued Ms Tiong a written warning in lieu of prosecution for attempted extortion in January 2020.
Justice Tan noted: “Ultimately, no true winner has emerged from this entire debacle.
“Although I have ruled against Ms Tiong, Dr Chan has borne, and will continue to bear, the shame of having his wanton and depraved behaviour aired in public for all to see.”
Ms Tiong was represented by lawyer Ong Ying Ping, while Dr Chan was defended by a legal team — Ms Rebecca Chew, Mr Darren Lim and Mr Benedict Tedjopranoto — from Rajah & Tann.