Thanks to Mr Cottonmouth for his investigative journalism, & efforts to show to World, or at least in SBF on WHO she really is, sadly an investigative journalism from Mainstream Media had NOT thought to conduct, to reveal truths or critical hypocrisy that is harmful to others & evolution.
My respect to Mdm Stephanie, being a woman & a fellow Human. She does have a right to do what she did, but what she had done may had caused MORE harm to womanhood and their PROGRESS by the REVELATION of FACTUAL EVIDENCE on who she truly is and what she SELFISHLY really is seeking for - ATTENTION.
Beauty is to be appreciated. While she may not be a SYT desired by men, she need not go to such lengths to draw selfish attention to herself in hopes of more clicks & opportunity on her flagrant social website exhibiting herself. She is no role model for womanhood, nor for women whom seek to progress with evolution & respect, or for mainstream media being fools to play into her selfish & HYPOCRATIC wiles. May women just be women & not presume to support her hypocrisy, hindering their own opportunities in life, as is their right.
She may had not like the man who took the photos, or had despised him for not being the man she would want in life, but it need not come to such, to harm others.
Taking pictures in admiration of beauty in ANY form is NOT a crime, so long as proprieties are respected such as nudity. ALL do take pictures of PUBLIC beauty, be it from nature or the such like, by even a PM, as beauty is to be shared, to INSPIRE OTHERS & TRANSFORM our World.
However, with such powers bestowed upon by technology, equally, we must use such powers responsibly. Anything that is on a personal basis & deemed private & do have private restrictions in place which must be respected, while still can be privately photographed, should NOT be shared without consent from the photographed, least it lead to harmful consequences such as those whom may not respect beauty, but to pervert it.
My respect to Mdm Stephanie, being a woman & a fellow Human. She does have a right to do what she did, but what she had done may had caused MORE harm to womanhood and their PROGRESS by the REVELATION of FACTUAL EVIDENCE on who she truly is and what she SELFISHLY really is seeking for - ATTENTION.
Beauty is to be appreciated. While she may not be a SYT desired by men, she need not go to such lengths to draw selfish attention to herself in hopes of more clicks & opportunity on her flagrant social website exhibiting herself. She is no role model for womanhood, nor for women whom seek to progress with evolution & respect, or for mainstream media being fools to play into her selfish & HYPOCRATIC wiles. May women just be women & not presume to support her hypocrisy, hindering their own opportunities in life, as is their right.
She may had not like the man who took the photos, or had despised him for not being the man she would want in life, but it need not come to such, to harm others.
Taking pictures in admiration of beauty in ANY form is NOT a crime, so long as proprieties are respected such as nudity. ALL do take pictures of PUBLIC beauty, be it from nature or the such like, by even a PM, as beauty is to be shared, to INSPIRE OTHERS & TRANSFORM our World.
However, with such powers bestowed upon by technology, equally, we must use such powers responsibly. Anything that is on a personal basis & deemed private & do have private restrictions in place which must be respected, while still can be privately photographed, should NOT be shared without consent from the photographed, least it lead to harmful consequences such as those whom may not respect beauty, but to pervert it.
Last edited:
