• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Sinkieland Caste System

WangChuk

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Oct 19, 2024
Messages
1,034
Points
63
https://www.asiaone.com/singapore/s...erral&utm_campaign=A1+trending&utm_content=c1


singapore

Shanmugam defends CMIO model, says removing it may result in 'worse outcomes'​

Shanmugam defends CMIO model, says removing it may result in 'worse outcomes'

Law and Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam said in Parliament on Feb 5 the CMIO framework has "worked quite well for us so far".
PHOTO: AsiaOne/Danial Zahrin
PUBLISHED ON February 05, 2025 3:33 PMByLim Kewei

The Chinese-Malay-Indian-Others (CMIO) framework has worked well for Singapore, and helped forge and preserve racial harmony, said Minister for Home Affairs and Law K Shanmugam on Wednesday (Feb 5).

He was responding to a parliamentary question by Non-Constituency Member of Parliament Leong Mun Wai on when the Government plans to review the CMIO model.

During an Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) conference last month, Minister for Culture, Community and Youth Edwin Tong said that the CMIO framework should be constantly reviewed to reflect Singapore's increasingly complex multicultural landscape.

In his reply during Parliament, Shanmugam said the CMIO framework helps the Government administer race-based policies and programmes which promote social cohesion, provide targeted interventions within the various racial communities, and safeguard the rights of minorities.

This includes the Ethnic Integration Policy (EIP) which draws from the CMIO framework to ensure a good mix of races in public housing estates.

While acknowledging there is "some truth" to what some say about the framework being "overly simplistic and rigid", the minister pointed out a 2021 IPS study which found that 87 per cent of respondents considered race important to their identity.

He added that over 60 per cent of Singapore residents polled in a 2021 CNA-IPS survey on race relations felt that the CMIO policy is effective in preserving racial harmony and should be retained.

"If we eliminated the framework, we may well get worse outcomes as a result," Shanmugam noted.

Looking overseas, the minister highlighted the racial tensions and rising race-related offences in France, which has banned the collection of race-based data since 1978.

Stating that he does not want to draw a "simple, straight-line conclusion" between France's data collection ban to its racial situation, Shanmugam said the lack of race-based data prevents measuring and understanding the difficulties that different races face in different areas and prevents effective intervention to resolve those issues.

"Our model of multiculturalism, multiracialism, with the data and framework we have, has worked quite well for us so far," he added.

"But as Minister Edwin Tong said, we do keep in mind the issue, review periodically, ask ourselves about the CMIO framework, amongst other issues, and see whether it continues to be relevant."

Separately, Shanmugam also questioned Leong's motives for raising concerns about the framework, saying that he and his party — the Progress Singapore Party — had previously criticised the EIP in Parliament.

Leong had been accused of making comments with racist undertones against Indians regarding the Singapore-India Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA).

In his response, Leong stated that his party supports the EIP but believes the policy causes economic disadvantages to minorities.
 
Electoral boundaries also “worked quite well for us so far"…so why need to change every 5 years?
 
Well... the blood donation form has more or less removed or diluted the original CIMO model since last year. Any comments from MOH or the Black Dog regarding that? :wink:
 
Correction. The 'I' represents only the Tamil Indians who fought together for independence from the Shit Brits. North Indians do not speak Tamil and Tamils do not speak Hindi. The 'C' represents the Nanyang Chinese. After influx of Tiongs, we get all these foods with Hanyu Pinyin names. It is Mee and not Mian. Kuay Teow and not Guo Tiao. Not keen to share my Sinkie identity with Tiongs and Cecas!
 
Back
Top