- Joined
- Nov 24, 2008
- Messages
- 23,396
- Points
- 113
The correct gay term is top/bottom.... Or one/zero.....not giver/taker
I did not know that. I defer to your intimate knowledge of Gay lexicon.
The correct gay term is top/bottom.... Or one/zero.....not giver/taker
He is one brave man. I admire him for being so fort right. If man is to love man, woman to love woman. We will not be reproducing ourselves enough. Eventually, Human race will die out.
We no need some War or some weapons of doom or some Prophet to tell us the end of World.
The correct gay term is top/bottom.... Or one/zero.....not giver/taker
This Bryan Lim is a former teacher and he still does know how to use Facebook and even understands the folly of acting tough online. Issue a threat and make claims and now offering a half assed apology where he claims that he was misunderstood. He has shut down his Facebook and Linkedin accounts and now under investigation by the Police as well as by employer Canon.
He is one brave man. I admire him for being so fort right. If man is to love man, woman to love woman. We will not be reproducing ourselves enough. Eventually, Human race will die out.
We no need some War or some weapons of doom or some Prophet to tell us the end of World.
This Bryan Lim is a former teacher and he still does know how to use Facebook and even understands the folly of acting tough online. Issue a threat and make claims and now offering a half assed apology where he claims that he was misunderstood. He has shut down his Facebook and Linkedin accounts and now under investigation by the Police as well as by employer Canon.
They should convict and fine him $1k for not understanding the implications of make claims and threats online and thinking that he could not be traced. Another $1k for coming out silly arguments about his threat. And also sentence him to do toilet valet services for 1 week at any entertainment outlet that is called the Blue Oyster Bar or prepared to be called on.
If yes, an police threatening to kill people not aligned to his lifestyle. If no, he is claiming to be one, hence impersonating as one. Either way, he need to do time in Changi resort.
There is a hangman at Changi resort who regularly commits state sanctioned murders. If he can get away with it then why can't Brian?
He claimed he is a police reservist, ie, served his national service obligation as a police.
But police made a statement that he is not.
So, is he or is he not a police reservist?
If yes, an police threatening to kill people not aligned to his lifestyle. If no, he is claiming to be one, hence impersonating as one. Either way, he need to do time in Changi resort.
So why is being gay, bisexual and lesbian wrong? And heterosexuality is correct, and only accepted?
What makes heterosexuals have the right to decide and restrict the rights of people with different sexual orientations?
Who is brian? Hangman is paid to do it just like hookers. This byran offerd to do it like a slut. Big diff
He did not threaten to kill. He said he'd shoot if given permission to do so by the state.
There is a hangman at Changi resort who regularly commits state sanctioned murders. If he can get away with it then why can't Brian?
That is why the title of the thread is such. PAP are gay haters and homophobic, hence their buggery rules and the campaign against sponsors of Pink Dot. Therefore, if he ask them for permission to shoot gays, will they give it? They are certainly more likely then say the US.
The PAP is not homophobic. It simply takes a stand against disgusting faggots trying to normalise their deviant behavior.
that is the definition of homophobic no?whether or not their behavior is normal or not,thats not up to u to decide,but being against them or their gay behaviour which is the essence of being gay is homophobic or anti gay,just like being against jews is anti Semitic or anti jew,
Then how come there is a picture of him in a police uniform 2 posts ahead of this? Are the police lying, trying to distance themselves from this bigot?
So actions which go against the norms of a decent and humane society should simply be ignored??
EG if I see an Indian woman setting fire to her daughter-in-law I just put it down to cultural differences?
And the genital mutilation of young girls in Africa is just "different" and not wrong?
Gimme a break.