• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Singpost Fires Top Management for suspicious behaviours!

Pinkieslut

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Apr 14, 2011
Messages
17,034
Points
113

SingPost sacks three senior executives, including group CEO, over mishandling of whistleblower's report​

Former group CEO Mr Vincent Phang and group CFO Mr Vincent Yik will "vigorously contest" their termination, said SingPost.
SingPost sacks three senior executives, including group CEO, over mishandling of whistleblower's report

From left: Singpost senior executives Vincent Phang, Vincent Yik and Li Yu. (Photos: Singpost website)



Listen
6 min
New: You can now listen to articles.
close.svg

22 Dec 2024 10:11PM(Updated: 22 Dec 2024 11:36PM)
Bookmark
WhatsAppTelegramFacebookTwitterEmailLinkedIn

Read a summary of this article on FAST.


FAST
SINGAPORE: Singapore Post has fired three of its senior executives after a probe into a whistleblower’s report found "grossly negligent" behaviour in their handling of internal investigations.

As part of disciplinary proceedings, SingPost terminated the employment of its group chief executive officer Mr Vincent Phang, group chief financial officer Mr Vincent Yik and chief executive of the company’s international business unit Mr Li Yu.

ADVERTISEMENT

SingPost said in an SGX filing on Sunday (Dec 22) that it commenced investigations after a whistleblowing report was filed earlier this year about the group's non-regulated international e-commerce logistics parcel business.

The report alleged that there were manual entries of certain delivery status codes by SingPost's international business unit. These were for international transhipment parcels which the company had agreed to deliver under an agreement with one of its largest customers.

These manual entries were allegedly done without basis or supporting documentation and with the intention of avoiding contractual penalties under the agreement.

Following an investigation, disciplinary proceedings were brought against three managers who were directly involved in the matter. It was found they had committed serious breaches of the company's code of conduct, SingPost said.

The managers were found to have performed or approved manual "delivery failure" status codes for parcels, even though no delivery attempt had been made and without supporting documents.

ADVERTISEMENT

They have been sacked and a police report made against them, it added.

"FAILED TO PERFORM THEIR DUTIES"​

A whistleblowing report on the same matter was also sent to the Infocomm Media Development Authority of Singapore, said SingPost.

External professional advisers were engaged to review and assess the matter independently of management.

SingPost said that the three senior executives were found to be "grossly negligent" in relation to their handling of internal investigations into the whistleblowing reports and renewal of the related agreement.

They also had "omitted to consider material facts that compromised their decision-making and/or failed to perform their duties responsibly and reliably".

In particular relation to the handling of the whistleblowing reports, SingPost said it was found that Mr Phang, Mr Yik and Mr Li had "accorded undue weight" to the misrepresentations by representatives from the international business unit operations.

ADVERTISEMENT

They did so without any independent substantiation or evidence, and had in turn made various serious misrepresentations to the audit committee, said SingPost.

Given the seriousness of these lapses and findings, SingPost said its board lost confidence and trust in the judgment of the three senior executives and in their ability to perform their duties towards promoting and protecting the interests of the company.

Disciplinary proceedings against Mr Phang, Mr Yik and Mr Li concluded at the close of business on Friday. Their employment was terminated with immediate effect on Saturday. Mr Phang was also asked to resign as a director of SingPost and all its related companies in accordance with his contractual obligations.

Mr Phang and Mr Yik have indicated that they will "vigorously contest" their termination, both on merits and on the grounds of procedural unfairness, said SingPost.

Mr Phang first joined SingPost in 2019 as the CEO for postal services and Singapore, which comprises post, parcel and logistics. He was appointed group CEO of SingPost in September 2021.

ADVERTISEMENT

According to his profile on SingPost's website, the group expanded into Australia under his leadership and developed its cross-border eCommerce logistics business globally.

He previously held senior leadership roles at ST Logistics and Toll and is deputy chairman of the Workplace Safety and Health Council.

Prior to joining SingPost in December 2021, Mr Yik was CFO at OUE Lippo Healthcare. His profile on the SingPost website shows he also previously held various key executive roles including at Far East Orchard and Australia Properties of Far East Organization, Sydney, as well as the Singapore branch of Australia & New Zealand Banking Group.

Mr Li was appointed CEO of SingPost's international business unit in September 2022. He previously oversaw global logistics and distribution for Asia-Pacific at the United Parcel Service and has worked in North America and Shanghai.

LEADERSHIP SUCCESSION​

SingPost said it will announce the appointment of the group CEO in due course.

ADVERTISEMENT

The current CFO of its Australian business, Mr Isaac Mah, will be appointed new group CFO.

In the interim, board chairman Mr Simon Israel will "provide increased guidance to and exercise greater oversight of the senior management leadership team in the company".

Postal services will not be affected, SingPost added.

An acting CEO will be appointed to lead the international business unit pending a board review. No appointment of a new chief executive is being proposed at this stage, said SingPost.

"The board recognises the importance of maintaining business continuity despite the events which have occurred following the whistleblowing reports, and the need to minimise the impact on its customers, employees, operations and assets," it said.

The company added that it believes that the "robust business continuity policies" and procedures which have been implemented, as well as the leadership succession plans, will serve to address the effects of any disruption which may be caused by such events.

ADVERTISEMENT

SingPost also said that it has informed the relevant customer about the whistleblowing reports and investigation findings. They have agreed on a settlement sum in lieu of penalties.

The settlement is not expected to have a material impact on SingPost’s net tangible assets or earnings per share for the current financial year, said the company.

It also noted that its business with the customer "has not been materially affected" and their contract was renewed following the settlement.
 
Fuck lah ,its corruption ,lol, using words again, lol,learn from masters
 
They look very suspicious. :cautious::sneaky::tongue:
 
According to Chatgpt:

The situation involving SingPost seems to revolve around allegations that its international business unit manually updated delivery status codes for transshipment parcels. These parcels were managed under an agreement with one of SingPost's significant customers. Here's what might have happened:

  1. Manual Updates: Instead of relying on automated tracking updates, employees or systems at SingPost's international unit manually inputted delivery statuses for certain parcels.
  2. Implications: This raises questions about the transparency and accuracy of the reporting process. Manual entries could potentially misrepresent the actual delivery status, leading to concerns from stakeholders about the reliability of SingPost's services.
  3. Context of the Agreement: Since the parcels were part of an agreement with a major customer, such discrepancies might affect trust and contractual obligations between the parties.
  4. Investigative or Regulatory Action: If these allegations are proven, regulatory bodies or the customer might demand an explanation, and SingPost could face reputational or operational consequences.
I would suspect the shipments missed delivery commitments, and knowing this will impact the financial performance, these jokers ordered the delivery status codes be altered manually.

In the logistics and freight forwarding industry, this would be akin to a crime and would be fired and never to work in the industry.

If its true, these jokers deserved to be fired ...
 
According to Chatgpt:

The situation involving SingPost seems to revolve around allegations that its international business unit manually updated delivery status codes for transshipment parcels. These parcels were managed under an agreement with one of SingPost's significant customers. Here's what might have happened:

  1. Manual Updates: Instead of relying on automated tracking updates, employees or systems at SingPost's international unit manually inputted delivery statuses for certain parcels.
  2. Implications: This raises questions about the transparency and accuracy of the reporting process. Manual entries could potentially misrepresent the actual delivery status, leading to concerns from stakeholders about the reliability of SingPost's services.
  3. Context of the Agreement: Since the parcels were part of an agreement with a major customer, such discrepancies might affect trust and contractual obligations between the parties.
  4. Investigative or Regulatory Action: If these allegations are proven, regulatory bodies or the customer might demand an explanation, and SingPost could face reputational or operational consequences.
I would suspect the shipments missed delivery commitments, and knowing this will impact the financial performance, these jokers ordered the delivery status codes be altered manually.

In the logistics and freight forwarding industry, this would be akin to a crime and would be fired and never to work in the industry.

If its true, these jokers deserved to be fired ...
ummm... could this be the reason why my packages show "delivered" but nowhere to be seen until mutiple calls to Singpost asking where exactly is my package and then 3 days later, shows up on my doorsteps?
 
ummm... could this be the reason why my packages show "delivered" but nowhere to be seen until mutiple calls to Singpost asking where exactly is my package and then 3 days later, shows up on my doorsteps?
And I believe the major customer is Apple. :frown:

Only a customer as large as Apple have this type of power :cool:
 
ummm... could this be the reason why my packages show "delivered" but nowhere to be seen until mutiple calls to Singpost asking where exactly is my package and then 3 days later, shows up on my doorsteps?
you are not the only one, i asked around and looks like it was quite widespread
 
Prices keep increasing but slow and low quality services.... one package delivery within a small island can take up to 7 days or sometimes even more.... the usual excuse being..... within 3 - 5 working days lol...... so non working days I hibernate sibo? I don't breath on non working days sibo? KNN.... The excuse of non working days is to buy more time for the delay.... When you have the audacity to charge high price, you have zero excuse for late delivery.

My packages took 2 days or so from the seller in China to reach Singapore. After it reaches Singapore, it took sometimes more than 3 to 5 days for them to be delivered. KNN ridiculous right? One tiny dot island on the map compared to China.... That shows how fucking low quality is the efficiency right?
YjUQMEO.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top