- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
- Messages
- 35,575
- Points
- 113
... Get the picture ...
we can't really just depend on the tourism dollar, can we? unless Singapore is the heaven on earth? :p
... Get the picture ...
On the other hand, people talk about PRs not staying. Question would be, do they feel welcome in the first place? Moving a family to another country is a big pain. Was it a push factor or a pull factor?
... On the other hand, people talk about PRs not staying. Question would be, do they feel welcome in the first place? Moving a family to another country is a big pain. Was it a push factor or a pull factor? ...
I think its much more than that. There is also the issue of managing expectations of locals and FTs. The government should be more transparent and engage the locals and FTs. There should be debates and discussions. If at the end of the day, all roads point to the current policy as it is implemented, there will be less anguish, pain and a lot more understanding.we can't really just depend on the tourism dollar, can we? unless Singapore is the heaven on earth? :p
... It will be good if others could throw light on the issues faced by new migrants ...
Thanks for sharing bro. Generally people who migrate are prepared to put the hard yards and acknowledge the hospitality of the host country. They will add to our gene pool (you are the expert here) but make this a better country.perhaps i could share this true account.
Dear Scroobal
I hanker for the days of the sixties where policy makers had imangination and drive because well Singapore had nothing and was nothing. It was literally seat of the pants decision making which was in my view highly entrepernarial and imanginative. Defying economic orthodoxy in the sixties and looking at FDI stands out in my mind. Locke
the pluses from the migrants must be tapped upon, whilst not causing much detrimental effects of the host's genome
if the elite truly engineered the migrants to come, they merely made this place more attractive to them
... Thanks for sharing bro ...
... have they made SG a better *home* for our own citizens? ...
I know what you mean. I hope we can find a way to get that spirit back. In a way, we are a lucky lot.just to share another account:
really missed those days where the kampung spirit is strong ;p
i was just having my cuppa at Parkway Parade earlier, and i see a colorful display of folks of all shapes and sizes... Koreans, Americans, and some Africans as well... a sincere smile and a nod, it is usually reciprocated...
... The ang mors may be polite but deep down they see themselves as superior to us ... The Koreans and Chinese are downright crass people ...
our Citizens should wake up now, they had better learn to start taking calculated risks, for they've been too prudent in their daily takings... question now is, how to gently arouse them from their slumber?
I am ex-Sg.>>>Planning is done so that the National Psyche is not bruised. Their citizens are not treated in a secondary manner and their needs are met without turning society topsy turvy. The final result is that their national identity remains intact while they progress as a nation.<<<
This is where PAP failed miserably.
On the other hand, people talk about PRs not staying. Question would be, do they feel welcome in the first place? Moving a family to another country is a big pain. Was it a push factor or a pull factor?
I am ex-Sg.
One day, after looking at the stupid ministers talking rubbish at a serious meeting, I have enough. These MIW are just normal human beings, why do they deserve such high pay, Singaporeans have been hoodwink by the propaganda and the lies created by the entire political machinary consisting of the mass media to the police to the justice system.
The founder of Singapore has squandered its opportunity to create a Singaporean identity. It has basically destroyed the existing institutions and started a post-1965 Singapore on a clean sheet of paper and a series of social-altering campaigns.
What we have now is a people who are petty and paranoid. Looking at the postings, I realised how naive Singaporeans are when it comes to world matters.
LKY must have noticed the mistakes he made in making himself a nanny of Singaporeans. He created a society that allowed him to rule without opposition in return for a good life. He must have thought --- these people are no talent, they are just good at paper chase and doing textbook jobs and think the PAP owe them a living. He has to bring in FTs to create a diversity Singapore need to survive in the 21st century.
Living in a real country and working in its public sector, I see a big difference in the way Australia and Singapore work.
Singaporeans may want to think that they are better than the Aussies. In a way, yes, Singapore is richer per capita compared to Australia. But in terms of diversity of services to its people, SG is still third world. A SG public servant will find it hard to use his/her skills in a government department in Australia.
I do not see Singapore improving for the next 5 or 10 years. The society is holding back itself. This is the failure of the government, which is masked by the specticular economic progress from 1973-1994 and its luck during the 1997 asian financial crisis.
... We need to have good people taking the lead. Singaporeans need to see good people coming forward with initiative ... Singapore needs such people to come forward and take the initial plunge, although the initial plunge is *always* the hardest ...