• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

[Singapore] - 16 cyclists arrested by Traffic Police & LTA for beating red light and riding against traffic flow on Apr 17 & 18

Bikes are not cheap anymore and the top of the range bikes costing $20,000 or more. Many of the cyclists on the road already own cars and have already paid for their right to use the road via the COEs and taxes that they paid. If they opt not to use their cars and ride their bikes they still have already paid for the privilege.

Besides the idea that the right to use the road is based on the amount paid would mean that Toyotas need to give way to Porsches which in turn have to give way to Ferraris and Lambos and pretty much everyone has to give way to the Bugatti Veyron.
Buy a bike for 20k? Sounds like a 'good' buy to me... guess there is a sucker born every minute
 
But u r an eunuch.... so wat talking u? Unless u meant your tongue... after all that is what u will be doing to ur fellow cyclists cos that is all u can do..

I still have my dick only testicles have been removed.
 
The cycling Terrorists will b up in arms over this as the existing policy ensures they have no responsibility or penalties to their recklessness, selfishness n inconsideration to motorists n pedestrians

Govt panel studying whether road cyclists should only ride in single file
It is also considering whether to impose a limit on groups that cycle on the road.
Joshua Lee |
clock.png

May 11, 2021, 02:30 PM
fb-icon.svg
tw-icon.svg
whats-icon.svg
Screenshot-2021-05-11-at-14.18.54.png

The Active Mobility Advisory Panel (AMAP) is studying whether cyclists should ride in a single file at all times, when cycling on roads.
IG Asia

It is also considering whether to impose a limit on groups that cycle on the road, announced Senior Minister of State for Transport Chee Hong Tat today (May 11) in Parliament.
Chee reiterated current road rules for cyclists, which include keeping to the left of the leftmost lane unless they are turning right, and riding in a single file on single-lane roads.
Currently, cyclists are allowed to ride in twos, provided that they are not riding on a single-lane road, or in a bus lane during bus lane hours.
Chee was responding to Sembawang Group Representation Constituency (GRC) Member of Parliament (MP) Poh Li San and Ang Mo Kio GRC MP Gan Thiam Poh, who had posed questions regarding safe cycling on the road.
Aside from these two suggestions, Chee also said that the AMAP has received mixed views from the public regarding the licensing of on-road cyclists.
"Some are in support of licensing, so that errant cyclists can be more easily identified and punished. Others have expressed concerns that licensing on-road cyclists will increase compliance costs and affect the livelihoods of Singaporeans who are using their bicycles for work and for commute."
Chee added that while the majority of road cyclists adhere to safety rules, there is a minority of errant cyclists who flout road rules, like refusing to stop at red lights, and riding on the expressway.
He also pointed out that cyclists are more vulnerable than those travelling in motor vehicles.
"The Active Mobility Advisory Panel, or AMAP, will review ways to raise awareness amongst motorists on how to share road space safely with cyclists and other users. Ultimately, there needs to be more graciousness, consideration, as well as give and take on the roads."
Top image via SG Road Vigilante.
fb-icon.svg
tw-icon.svg
whats-icon.svg

If you like what you read, follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Telegram to get the latest updates.
 
Since cycling on the express way is illegal n the cyclists met an accident, does that mean the cyclists is fully liable for the accident?

Do not cycle on expressways: S'pore police & LTA
No.

Belmont Lay |


November 03, 2020, 01:52 PM



The Singapore police and Land Transport Authority have issued a joint statement warning cyclists to not cycle on expressways.

This was following a recent accident on an expressway here that resulted in multiple injuries.

The joint statement said:

On Oct. 28, 2020, the police attended to a road traffic accident along the Ayer Rajah Expressway where a cyclist lost control of her bicycle and collided into a bus.

She was conveyed to the hospital with multiple injuries.

Recently, there have also been videos of cyclists riding on expressways being circulated on social media. We urge cyclists to be mindful of their safety and not cycle on expressways where vehicles travel at higher speeds.

Under Rule 3 of the Road Traffic (Expressway – Excluded Vehicles) Rules 2010, cyclists are not permitted to ride their bicycles, including Power Assisted Bicycles, on expressways.

Cyclists who are found riding on expressways may be liable for a fine not exceeding S$2,000 or imprisonment of up to six months.

The authorities will enforce against road users who choose to flout the traffic rules.

We also urge all road users to play their part by adopting good RoadSense and to look out for one another.

Prior to this, a cyclist was caught on camera cycling on the right-most lane of the AYE, forcing the car that shot the footage to swerve to narrowly avoid the cyclist.

We deliver more stories to you on LinkedIn

Mothership Linkedin
If you like what you read, follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Telegram to get the latest updates.
 
Since these cyclists are cycling illegally,,,will they be fully liable for any accidents??

LTA catches 5 cyclists riding on expressways during May 13 enforcement operations​

LTA reminded the public that cycling on expressways is not allowed.
Siti Hawa |
clock.png
May 14, 2021, 12:35 PM

Untitled-collage-2021-05-14T104459.150.jpg


Events


NOVELA Member Day Sale​

25 March 2021 - 28 March 2021
Online


During the holiday break on May 13, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) carried out enforcement operations against errant cyclists.









Riding on expressways​


In a Facebook post on Friday (May 14), LTA revealed that five cyclists had been caught riding on expressways.


183428158_5479944918742366_2486162014722035594_n.jpeg
Photo via LTA on Facebook


185286636_5479944948742363_8483157294384733939_n.jpeg
Photo via LTA on Facebook

In its post, LTA reminded the public that cycling on expressways is "strictly not allowed".
Cycling on expressways endangers the cyclist as well as other road users.
Under Rule 3 of the Road Traffic (Expressway – Excluded Vehicles) Rules 2010, cyclists are not permitted to ride their bicycles, including Power Assisted Bicycles, on expressways.
Those caught cycling on expressways can be fined up to S$2,000 and/or be jailed up to six months.
 
Those idiots need to be stoned to death.

But why is the penalty for cyclists far greater than the same offense committed by motorists despite the fact that motorists cause far more danger when they break the law?
 
But why is the penalty for cyclists far greater than the same offense committed by motorists despite the fact that motorists cause far more danger when they break the law?
Because they spoil the reputation of cyclists...
 
Are their bikes confiscated? Evidence needed, right, of their sins?
Then they walk home?
 
But why is the penalty for cyclists far greater than the same offense committed by motorists despite the fact that motorists cause far more danger when they break the law?
In what ways are cyclists penalised more?
 
The self entitlement demands from the cycling Terrorists knows no bounds. To avoid liability they are demanding others be gracious to them. Why don't they call for fair regulation n fair treatment for all? The answer is greed, selfishness n don't want responsibility.

Commentary: Errant cycling gives the rest of us cyclists a bad name​

Singapore’s cycling journey has had ups and downs but instead of calling for more regulation, we could all stand to exercise more graciousness, says Jeremy Nguee.
Cyclists along a Park Connector in Singapore.

Bookmark​

SINGAPORE: It was that week after Christmas in 2020.
The air was a nippy 23 degrees Celsius and there was even a chilly snap. A low mist had risen over the grass, and the roads were moistened black with the torrential rain, without a chance to dry.
The sunrise was surreal on those mornings, filtering through old trees, reflecting on the still puddles and enveloping the buildings in a transparent sheet of gold.
I had been riding for six consecutive days by then, clocking over 500km. I was a little sore but wasn’t going to pass up the opportunity to experience the magic again.
Like many Singaporeans, I haven’t had the chance to travel in 2020. To enjoy this cool weather and beautiful scenery right here at home in Singapore felt like I was discovering a new city.
A cyclist seen with a mini Singapore flag affixed to his bicycle at Woodlands Waterfront Park. (Photo: Try Sutrisno Foo)

READ: Commentary: Cycling great for going green but is still a pain in urban Singapore

A multitude of cyclists must have thought the same that day, pouring out into the streets and park connectors, joining joggers and hikers to enjoy the cool morning air.
THE GOOD: THE EXPLOSION IN CYCLING ENTHUSIASTS
COVID-19 and the subsequent lockdowns have catalysed an explosion in the number of people who have embraced jogging, cycling or simply enjoying the outdoors around the world.
We have found new ways to manage our mental health, connect with our families, and become more conscious about sustainable ways of living.
For cities globally, this has renewed interest in the environment and in creating safer ways of travelling.
Cycling, whether as a form of commute or recreation, has been touted as the answer. It has numerous additional benefits in community building and keeping the general population healthy and active.
THE BAD: HIGH-PROFILE ACCIDENTS FUELLINGS CALLS FOR TOUGHER REGULATIONS
Yet recently, a number of incidents caused by cyclists has raised the old debate of whether cyclists should be allowed on the road and if more limits should be imposed given that they can be a hindrance and cause of accidents.

Get the expert view​

The best commentaries and analysis to better help you see beyond today’s news headlines. Subscribe to CNA’s Commentary newsletter.​

This service is not intended for persons residing in the EU. By clicking subscribe, I agree to receive news updates and promotional material from Mediacorp and Mediacorp's partners.
Sign me up
Tales of enforcement officers fining a group of more than 30 errant cyclists over one weekend come to mind too.
The Government has been faced with calls to regulate their use. A panel will now review regulations for cyclists on the road and study if tests and licenses should be required, Senior Minister of State for Transport Chee Hong Tat said in April. But is that really the best way to go?
There is no excuse for lawless behaviour and errant cyclists should be taken to tasks. Here is where higher penalties for reckless riding harming others raised just last October are welcomed. Perpetrators are looking at a potential jail term not just a fine.
Yet when people ask if cyclists should be licensed, I wonder if the comparison with cars and powered bikes is a fair one, where errant and negligent drivers behind the wheel of powerful vehicles can cause more harm. Are government resources not better spent elsewhere?
Speed surely cannot be the issue if sport car drivers aren’t treated differently from the average car driver.

READ: Commentary: The PMD problem in Singapore is not just about jostling for space

THE NICE: CYCLING GROUPS
Like everyone who follows the rules and tries to keep the peace, I too am annoyed by cyclists who change lanes without consideration, or run double white lines.
The errant cyclist does not represent the community in the same way a bad driver does not represent all drivers. So let’s not demonise cyclists
There are numerous cycling interest groups promoting responsible cycling that better represent the good intentions and law-abiding nature of cyclists in Singapore: Brompton Singapore organises group rides for owners of the iconic folding bicycle, while Women’s Cycling Project gets together women cyclers.
There are also groups by geography, whether Eastcyclopedia for riders in the East or West Coast Riders.
Within this tight-knit community, we are responsible road users who do our best to help new riders familiarise themselves with road conditions, and encourage them to learn the laws and apply them well. We know deviating risks our own safety.
Cyclists in Singapore. (Photo: Yeo Kai Ting)
During each outing, ride leaders take care of their pack. They provide a safety briefing. They set expectations that traffic rules will be adhered to, including stopping at all red lights without exception.
Leaders also take pains to go over essential etiquette riders should display, in signalling to change lanes, checking back and calling out obstacles.
They also teach techniques to deal with practical situations, such as how to ride two-abreast on roads without obstructing traffic, and how to change to single-file on two-way, single-lane carriage roads to allow cars to pass in a safe manner.

READ: Commentary: Banning bicycles from footpaths won’t make poor cycling habits disappear

As an extension of the social nature of cycling groups, a number also organise charity drives to give back to society.
Before the circuit breaker last year, Brompton Riders had an annual ride to pack and distribute care packs on their bikes to the needy, while Rapha Cycling Club organised a ride in September 2020 to send coffee care packs sponsored by PPP Coffee to nominated essential worker heroes.
THE HOPE: A GRACIOUS SOCIETY
If you are a new cyclist planning on using the road, my advice is you acquaint yourself with the laws on road use. Better yet, get in touch with the many cycling groups in Singapore either out of the local bike shops or online groups.
Cycling paths in Singapore. (Photo: MEWR)
Fellow cyclists will be happy to help you, but we will also not hesitate to tell you off if you run afoul of the law. We are tough on our own because we know deep down inside, solving errant cycling will require weeding out the bad guys.
But we could sure use more cooperation from all road users. For one, car drivers and other motorists could be more patient with cyclists as they are with trucks, buses and other slow-moving vehicles.
They should also be familiar with the Road Traffic Act and adhere to the rules so as not to endanger cyclists: Stop at stop lines, give way at give way lines, and not be tempted to go above the speed limit just because no one is looking.
Our authorities also have much to do to transform our country into one that embraces the future, and this action starts now. Young people should be engaged about safe public path use.
 
The cycling terrorists now kpkb their own.. this is the result of selfish inconsiderate assholes just being themselves n now eating their own. N this sort of shit can claim skills future fund? The greed of the cycling terrorists knows no bounds.



Netizens think SCF’s basic bike mechanics course at S$500 per pax “overpriced”, say lesson content “can be learned from youtube” - The Online Citizen Asia​

Netizens think SCF’s basic bike mechanics course at S$500 per pax “overpriced”, say lesson content “can be learned from youtube”

The Singapore Cycling Federation (SCF) will be conducting a three-day basic bike mechanics course in June, which will cover a full range of bike maintenance topics such as how to quick release skewers, with a course fee at S$500 per pax.
SCF first announced the basic bike mechanics course on its Facebook page on 10 May.
The course will be conducted in two sessions, with the first session from 2 June to 4 June, and another session from 23 June to 25 June. The venue will be located at RS Works, 500 Changi Road.
According to SCF, the course comprises 16 hours of theoretical and practical lessons by a certified mechanics course instructor from the Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI).
“The theoretical part of the course will introduce and cover a full range of bike maintenance topics (even the more advanced contents!), while the practical part will focus more on the basics,” it wrote, adding that the course is SkillsFuture Credit claimable.
SkillsFuture Credit is a one-time S$500 top-up given by the Government to all Singaporeans aged 25 years and above to encourage them to learn new skills. The top-up will expire by the end of 2025.
According to SCF’s advertisement, the basic bike mechanics course content includes guidance on how to quick release skewers, remove front and rear wheels, repair a puncture, change a tube and tires, and bike cleaning.
Participants will also be guided on how to fix drop chain, remove and install pedals, headset, gears adjustments, basic bike fit, routine checks and safety tips.
SCF noted that bicycles and toolkits will be provided to participants during the course.
In addition, participants who complete the course at a satisfactory level will be awarded a certificate of completion endorsed by SCF.
However, many netizens were surprised that SCF would charge S$500 per pax for a basic bike mechanics course that “can be learned from Youtube”, saying that the fee is “overpriced” and “super expensive”.
One netizen commented on SCF’s post saying that “all these are taught by the shop” when buying a brand new bicycle.
“Singapore Cycling Federation actually endorse this course? Extremely overpriced for such a basic content. This is very wrong,” another netizen wrote.
FireShot-Capture-3675-Singapore-Cycling-Federation-Posts-Facebook-web.facebook.com_.png
FireShot-Capture-3678-Singapore-Cycling-Federation-Posts-Facebook-web.facebook.com_.png
FireShot-Capture-3687-Singapore-Cycling-Federation-Posts-Facebook-web.facebook.com_.png
FireShot-Capture-3690-Singapore-Cycling-Federation-Posts-Facebook-web.facebook.com_.png
FireShot-Capture-3693-Singapore-Cycling-Federation-Posts-Facebook-web.facebook.com_.png
FireShot-Capture-3696-Singapore-Cycling-Federation-Posts-Facebook-web.facebook.com_.png
FireShot-Capture-3699-Singapore-Cycling-Federation-Posts-Facebook-web.facebook.com_.png
FireShot-Capture-3711-Singapore-Cycling-Federation-Posts-Facebook-web.facebook.com_.png

One netizen commented that the maximum fee for such courses should be at least S$150 to S$200.
FireShot-Capture-3681-Singapore-Cycling-Federation-Posts-Facebook-web.facebook.com_.png

Share this:​

 
Bike weight is wat cyclists always compare with one another. The lighter the better. They are not real men...so can't compare anything else...wat a sad lot
the lighter the bike the bigger the dick. that 6.9 kg bike however is for rich kids from 6.9 to 16.9 years old.
 
the lighter the bike the bigger the dick. that 6.9 kg bike however is for rich kids from 6.9 to 16.9 years old.
If they got 'big dicks' as u say...they would definitely not be showing off the bikes n comparing bikes. It's more likely they are over compensating for their lack of manhood...with bike weight. As tat is the only thing they can compare with. N yes I heard of those 20k USD bikes etc. A fool n his money are soon parted. Spend that sort of money n still have to use pedal power? Some logic that is
 
If they got 'big dicks' as u say...they would definitely not be showing off the bikes n comparing bikes. It's more likely they are over compensating for their lack of manhood...with bike weight. As tat is the only thing they can compare with. N yes I heard of those 20k USD bikes etc. A fool n his money are soon parted. Spend that sort of money n still have to use pedal power? Some logic that is
i can lift mine with two fingers. i need a bike which allows me to lift the middle finger anytime.
1621619276559.png
 
Back
Top