• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

[Singapore] - 16 cyclists arrested by Traffic Police & LTA for beating red light and riding against traffic flow on Apr 17 & 18

I see....

so let’s ban all slow moving vehicles, motorcycles and little old ladies crossing the road.

so that you may roam care free like some failed actor.

your have the logic of a common garden adder.
Vehicles move at speeds according to traffic conditions. If the speed limit is 60km/h than go at tat speed. Motorcycles etc go at that speed too..can cyclists cycle at the speed limit? pedestrian cross the road at pedestrian crossing is perfectly legit. If cyclists cross the road at pedestrian crossing...they get off the bike n cross. These are the rules. Retard...
 
Vehicles move at speeds according to traffic conditions. If the speed limit is 60km/h than go at tat speed. Motorcycles etc go at that speed too..can cyclists cycle at the speed limit? pedestrian cross the road at pedestrian crossing is perfectly legit. If cyclists cross the road at pedestrian crossing...they get off the bike n cross. These are the rules. Retard...

The speed limit is a maximum speed not a minimum speed.

In most suburban roads where I am the speed limit is 50kph. A group of cyclists usually cruise at between 42 and 45kph with each cyclist taking a turn at the front.

If a driver is happy to sit behind he/she is most welcome. Those who want to overtake can do so when they are able. Cyclists are not obligated to cower in the gutter just to make things convenient for motorists.

I'm not sure exactly how the roads are funded in Singapore but in most suburbs the funding comes from council rates and cyclists pay their share just as motorists do. In fact a cyclist with a $20,000 bike usually stays in a swanky home which means he pays more rates and taxes than the average motorist.
 
The speed limit is a maximum speed not a minimum speed.

In most suburban roads where I am the speed limit is 50kph. A group of cyclists usually cruise at between 42 and 45kph with each cyclist taking a turn at the front.

If a driver is happy to sit behind he/she is most welcome. Those who want to overtake can do so when they are able. Cyclists are not obligated to cower in the gutter just to make things convenient for motorists.

I'm not sure exactly how the roads are funded in Singapore but in most suburbs the funding comes from council rates and cyclists pay the same amount as motorists. In fact a cyclist with a $20,000 bike usually stays in a swanky home which means he pays more rates and taxes than the average motorist.
Why should Motorists cower to the tyranny of cyclists? N since more cyclists are on the road they should b licensed, insured and tax like sny vehicle... because they claim to have vehicle rights... therefore they should have vehicle responsibility too
 
Why should Motorists cower to the tyranny of cyclists? N since more cyclists are on the road they should b licensed, insured and tax like sny vehicle... because they claim to have vehicle rights... therefore they should have vehicle responsibility too

There is no tyranny in cyclists using the road that everyone pays for. Vehicle insurance is compulsory because they maim, kill and destroy public and private property.

On the other hand the probability of a cyclist causing a death or serious injury to someone else is minimal and if they crash into a lamp post the post is fine. They might cause a scratch or dent on a car in a collision but so too can a pedestrian who is not careful.
 
There is no tyranny in cyclists using the road that everyone pays for. Vehicle insurance is compulsory because they maim, kill and destroy public and private property.

On the other hand the probability of a cyclist causing a death or serious injury to someone else is minimal and if they crash into a lamp post the post is fine. They might cause a scratch or dent on a car in a collision but so too can a pedestrian who is not careful.

I don't see cyclists paying? Do they pay road tax? R they Insured? They pay ERP n toll? N they slow down vehicles? In u in kiwiland. U expect trucks, road trains n semis to change lane for them? If cyclists cause few accidents as you say, their license n insurance would be cheap..so no issues. Pedestrian use foot path n pedestrian crossing..they don't walk in the road
 
I don't see cyclists paying? Do they pay road tax? R they Insured? They pay ERP n toll? N they slow down vehicles? In u in kiwiland. U expect trucks, road trains n semis to change lane for them? If cyclists cause few accidents as you say, their license n insurance would be cheap..so no issues. Pedestrian use foot path n pedestrian crossing..they don't walk in the road

The building and maintenance of the transport system does not come from road taxes. It comes from the consolidated fund which everyone contributes to cyclists included.
 
The building and maintenance of the transport system does not come from road taxes. It comes from the consolidated fund which everyone contributes to cyclists included.
So why are there road tax n ERP? N why are cyclists given more rights than motorists when they are not licensed n insured?
 
So why are there road tax n ERP? N why are cyclists given more rights than motorists when they are not licensed n insured?

You have to ask your MP what happens to all that money but it certainly isn't earmarked for transport infrastructure.

Roads were built for bicycles long before they were built for cars.
 
You have to ask your MP what happens to all that money but it certainly isn't earmarked for transport infrastructure.

Roads were built for bicycles long before they were built for cars.
Now roads are built for cars. N if its for cyclists.. clear n fair rules should b implemented..like a road dedicated for them n cycling paths built funded by cycling licences. N if the cyclists move onto the main road from the cycling path they get fined n penalised... nothing wrong in that. Fair rules for all
 
Now roads are built for cars. N if its for cyclists.. clear n fair rules should b implemented..like a road dedicated for them n cycling paths built funded by cycling licences. N if the cyclists move onto the main road from the cycling path they get fined n penalised... nothing wrong in that. Fair rules for all

Roads are built for everyone. The cars already have exclusive use of the expressways. The rest of the road infrastructure has to be shared. If the motorists are not happy and think that bicycles are a privileged lot they are welcome to join the cyclists and become one big happy family. Otherwise they should just shut the fuck up and learn to share the roads.
 
So why are there road tax n ERP? N why are cyclists given more rights than motorists when they are not licensed n insured?
Road tax is based on engine capacity and carbon emission. Give it a rest. You are proving you are a moron. But we already know that.
 
Roads are built for everyone. The cars already have exclusive use of the expressways. The rest of the road infrastructure has to be shared. If the motorists are not happy and think that bicycles are a privileged lot they are welcome to join the cyclists and become one big happy family. Otherwise they should just shut the fuck up and learn to share the roads.
Roads are built for cars if cyclists who want to insist on cycling on roads..they could buy cars n drive n pay the compliance costs. Or they can cycle at their own risks and bear all responsibility for the cock ups. But they want others to be responsible for them. N can pedestrian cross the road willy nilly as they like? Isnt Jaywalking a crime?
 
Roads are built for cars if cyclists who want to insist on cycling on roads..they could buy cars n drive n pay the compliance costs. Or they can cycle at their own risks and bear all responsibility for the cock ups. But they want others to be responsible for them. N can pedestrian cross the road willy nilly as they like? Isnt Jaywalking a crime?

Can't you get it into your thick skull that the roads are NOT built exclusively for cars. Roads are transport links. They are there to provide a smooth surface for all those who want to get from one place to another and that includes the ice cream man, the trishaw rider, the satay man etc.

Since when were the statutes changed to ban everyone but cars off the streets?


1620461627795.png


1620461677358.png


1620461762501.png
 
Everyone shared the streets of Singapore for more than one hundred years and suddenly drivers think they own the roads?

1620461925633.png
 
Cars, bikes, push carts, motorcycles, all coexisting happily.

1620462193910.png
 
Can't you get it into your thick skull that the roads are NOT built exclusively for cars. Roads are transport links. They are there to provide a smooth surface for all those who want to get from one place to another and that includes the ice cream man, the trishaw rider, the satay man etc.

Since when were the statutes changed to ban everyone but cars off the streets?


View attachment 110202

View attachment 110203

View attachment 110204
Can u get it through yr retarded brain of yours that satay man etc don't exists of obsolete in prying their trade on bicycles. Even ice cream man use bikes. Why why are cyclists so unwilling to accept responsibility n consideration of cycling..so far all i hear is cars must give way to them. And its my right to cycle as i like as i am not responsible for even myself.. others responsible for me..so far tat is all i hear
 
Can u get it through yr retarded brain of yours that satay man etc don't exists of obsolete in prying their trade on bicycles. Even ice cream man use bikes. Why why are cyclists so unwilling to accept responsibility n consideration of cycling..so far all i hear is cars must give way to them. And its my right to cycle as i like as i am not responsible for even myself.. others responsible for me..so far tat is all i hear
Cyclists are asking for nothing more than to use what they are entitled to without harassment.
 
Everyone shared the streets of Singapore for more than one hundred years and suddenly drivers think they own the roads?

View attachment 110205
i had oodles of noodles from this milf auntie before. i was only a kid. 20c per bowl, and she washed the dirty bowls with the same pail of water all day. no wonder her noodles tasted so good.
 
Cyclists are asking for nothing more than to use what they are entitled to without harassment.
Wat a load of crock...only a cyclist is that shameless n cheap like a slut will say that but don't mean it... they expect the others to cower to them..not pay a cent to use the roads...n have a God given entitlement to run red light...n not follow the rules..

34 cyclists caught for breaking rules, with 16 running red lights
The LTA teamed up with the Traffic Police to deploy officers to Ayer Rajah Expressway, West Coast Highway as well as Bukit Timah and Tanah Merah Coast roads. Errant cyclists can land fines of $75.
The LTA teamed up with the Traffic Police to deploy officers to Ayer Rajah Expressway, West Coast Highway as well as Bukit Timah and Tanah Merah Coast roads. Errant cyclists can land fines of $75. PHOTOS: LAND TRANSPORT AUTHORITY
In enforcement operations over just two days in a few locations - and coming after complaints about errant riders - 34 cyclists were caught flouting rules on the roads.
The Land Transport Authority (LTA) said in a Facebook post yesterday that the errant road cyclists were spotted during enforcement operations conducted with the Traffic Police.
"While most were law-abiding, we did find 16 cyclists who rode on the road without helmets," LTA added. Another 16 were caught running red lights. "Two also rode against the flow of traffic."
Such offences can draw fines of $75.
Officers were deployed on the Ayer Rajah Expressway, West Coast Highway as well as Bukit Timah and Tanah Merah Coast roads, the authority said.
LTA said it was happy to see more people taking up cycling but urged them to keep safety in mind.
It added that cyclists should follow the rules and be considerate and gracious towards others.
The perennial conflict between cyclists and motorists came to the fore again on April 1 when actor Tay Ping Hui shared a video of a group of road cyclists disregarding traffic rules.
He said it was an issue he had experienced for the "umpteenth time", and suggested that all bicycles be registered.
Several others, including Temasek chief executive Ho Ching, then echoed Mr Tay's calls for more regulations for road cyclists.
Senior Minister of State for Transport Chee Hong Tat announced last Monday that a panel would review existing regulations governing cyclists on the roads, and study whether theory tests and licences should be required for them.
Mr Francis Chu, co-founder of the Love Cycling SG group, said he was encouraged that LTA found only a small minority of the road cyclists were breaking the rules.
"Some of the 'black sheep' videos get repeated thousands of times over social media, making it look as if Singapore roads are full of errant cyclists," he added.
"This gives drivers the false impression that most of the cyclists on the roads are bad."
He suggested that the authorities publicise the number of good cyclists they spotted, and not just the ones breaking the rules.
Mr Chu also called for similar enforcement operations and breakdown of cases for dangerous driving.
"To truly address road safety, we need to address bad behaviour by both motorists and cyclists," he noted.
Meanwhile, Mr Steven Lim, president of the Safe Cycling Task Force, said he was disappointed whenever there were complaints about cyclists flouting simple rules like not stopping at traffic lights.
He added: "When I go to schools to give talks, three-year-old kids can tell me that they must stop at red lights, so why can't adults understand that?
"It's not just about following rules - it's also about how you protect yourself and how you can protect other road users."
Join ST's Telegram channel here and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Straits Times on April 19, 2021, with the headline '34 cyclists caught for breaking rules, with 16 running red lights'. Subscribe
 
Back
Top