• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

sick paedo jonathan wong kena cane b4 in sec sch for peepin at teachers

wahlaneh...
while he is being held in UK maybe our mata should go n search his house sure can find more juicy evidences.
 
i see. so if another scholar helps stop a comet from crashing into the earth and causing global human extinction, i suppose you'd recommend that the entire psc panel be made into saints and given automatic places in heaven. hell, no need for that. when a moe scholar does good work as a teacher and changes our kids' lives (which happens more often than you think), every psc panel member should be given automatic pay raise and promotions. i like your style, very much.

oh, i forgot; you only take note when they fail because it reminds you you're not such a loser human being after all. my mistake.

I opine it is more acceptable if PSC was aware of his past and yet decided to grant him the scholarship. No one is perfect and deserves a second chance. Take Tharman for example. Whatever said, he was convicted in court for OSA and coz he is deserving, he rose to where he is today.

The tragedy would be PSC dealing with him NOT KNOWING his antecedent. MOE may not be aware or aware but for whatever reason best known to themselves, chose not to disclose THAT peeping incident.
 
PSC handles the entire process for govt scholarships. MOE and all other ministries merely submit names after brief interviews.

That was the very old system.

Now there's a new system. Regardless of the scholarship they apply to, everyone first goes through the PSC system. After a quick assessment of grades and CCAs, PSC selects the best people they want to interview - as long as they have PSC as one of their top scholarship choices - and then channels the rest of the people to the ministries for the ministries' own interviews. So PSC only handles the final selections of SAFOS, SPFOS, OMS, L-OMS scholars. The final decision to award the MOE scholarship to this paedo was made by MOE, after the paedo has had this final interview by MOE people. This guy probably never got interviewed by PSC before being sent to MOE for interviews. MOE was at fault here. Why do you think everyone in the forum pages and ST Forum is pointing the finger at MOE.
 
This is not to say that PSC has never failed. Indeed they have - many times, but just not in this instance. Remember the teaching scholar from years ago who posted racist comments on his blog? That guy was selected by PSC, not MOE. Then about 10 years ago, a President's scholar, no less, was stripped of his scholarship because of his overzealous alcoholism and bad grades during university. But most people perform well as expected. So don't worry about your taxpayer's money. PSC got all of it back.
 
I opine it is more acceptable if PSC was aware of his past and yet decided to grant him the scholarship. No one is perfect and deserves a second chance. Take Tharman for example. Whatever said, he was convicted in court for OSA and coz he is deserving, he rose to where he is today.

The tragedy would be PSC dealing with him NOT KNOWING his antecedent. MOE may not be aware or aware but for whatever reason best known to themselves, chose not to disclose THAT peeping incident.

I don't think it's acceptable either way. This paedo was hot for girls in a school environment, of all places. I wouldn't send him to work in schools if I knew.
 
wahlaneh...
this sicko bugger must have been sexually abused as a child thats why taking revenge on small kids. sicko!
 
That was the very old system.

Now there's a new system. Regardless of the scholarship they apply to, everyone first goes through the PSC system. After a quick assessment of grades and CCAs, PSC selects the best people they want to interview - as long as they have PSC as one of their top scholarship choices - and then channels the rest of the people to the ministries for the ministries' own interviews. So PSC only handles the final selections of SAFOS, SPFOS, OMS, L-OMS scholars. The final decision to award the MOE scholarship to this paedo was made by MOE, after the paedo has had this final interview by MOE people. This guy probably never got interviewed by PSC before being sent to MOE for interviews. MOE was at fault here. Why do you think everyone in the forum pages and ST Forum is pointing the finger at MOE.

Acknowledged. Thank you. My info may be outdated.
 
I don't think it's acceptable either way. This paedo was hot for girls in a school environment, of all places. I wouldn't send him to work in schools if I knew.

I respect and understand where you are coming from. But my opinion differs. For instance, if a teenager was caught shoplifting, that means he can never be a cop?

Honestly, how many of us can claim we never 'churi' from our school canteen or bookshop? It is whether we were or weren't caught. If caught, was it handed over to the police for court action? So, we do have many such 'not caught criminals' among us.

Peeping is the max I would tolerate. If he had molested a girl, then I say MOE, if they were aware, SHOULD NOT even consider his application.

I suppose we have to respectfully agree to disagree here.
 
I respect and understand where you are coming from. But my opinion differs. For instance, if a teenager was caught shoplifting, that means he can never be a cop?

Honestly, how many of us can claim we never 'churi' from our school canteen or bookshop? It is whether we were or weren't caught. If caught, was it handed over to the police for court action? So, we do have many such 'not caught criminals' among us.

Peeping is the max I would tolerate. If he had molested a girl, then I say MOE, if they were aware, SHOULD NOT even consider his application.

I suppose we have to respectfully agree to disagree here.

I guess we have to disagree. My thinking is - although it's hard to hire teachers per se, for teaching SCHOLARSHIPS there are tons of teenagers dying to sign a bond so that they can see the world for 4 years and then realise it's really no big deal once you've been there. If they knew about the peeping incident, they could well have picked the next guy who is equally qualified but without this blemish on his record. They have tons of qualified scholarship applicants to choose from and there's no reason to take a risk, even a small one. Not least to cover your butt by preventing bad publicity like this from happening.
 
I guess we have to disagree. My thinking is - although it's hard to hire teachers per se, for teaching SCHOLARSHIPS there are tons of teenagers dying to sign a bond so that they can see the world for 4 years and then realise it's really no big deal once you've been there. If they knew about the peeping incident, they could well have picked the next guy who is equally qualified but without this blemish on his record. They have tons of qualified scholarship applicants to choose from and there's no reason to take a risk, even a small one. Not least to cover your butt by preventing bad publicity like this from happening.

Ok. Thanks for the healthy discussion.
 
I opine it is more acceptable if PSC was aware of his past and yet decided to grant him the scholarship. No one is perfect and deserves a second chance. Take Tharman for example. Whatever said, he was convicted in court for OSA and coz he is deserving, he rose to where he is today.

The tragedy would be PSC dealing with him NOT KNOWING his antecedent. MOE may not be aware or aware but for whatever reason best known to themselves, chose not to disclose THAT peeping incident.

I have a feeling that it is more a case of Chinese High not disclosing the info, for whatever reason. Most probably also want a 'clean' Chinese High kind of reputation, and was hoping that it was a one-off offence.

On the other hand, reports that are coming out seem to show that this guy is quite brilliant - especially in the humanities. So, since everyone is going on about the humanities and building a future liberal arts college kind of atmosphere, maybe MOE knew but thought it was a one-off thing.

As for the Thaman incident, it was such a minor offence - releasing some economic estimates too early -- It was such an idiotic and minor offence that at that time everyone thought it was probably some jealous person who tried to dock him in. Really was the most silly possible, to be charged with the official secrets act.
 
I have a feeling that it is more a case of Chinese High not disclosing the info, for whatever reason. Most probably also want a 'clean' Chinese High kind of reputation, and was hoping that it was a one-off offence.

Knowing the chinese high management, this wouldn't be surprising.
 
paedophile jonathan wong kena caned before in sec school for peeping at female students and teachers....but then he still can get scholarship from moe......i tot to get scholarship MOE will look at the student record ........:confused::mad:

If this is the behavior of a scholar, what does it say about the lesser mortals out there? :rolleyes:
 
oh, i forgot; you only take note when they fail because it reminds you you're not such a loser human being after all. my mistake.

No, you're reiterating the PAP style. When they screw up, let's forget it and move on. When things work out, it's due to the great leadership of the PAP and more bonus to them. Meanwhile, they are paid millions no matter what happens.
 
Johnny got caught because he was too arrogant and stupid.

Academia are only good with examinations and its stops there...:D
 
I have a feeling that it is more a case of Chinese High not disclosing the info, for whatever reason. Most probably also want a 'clean' Chinese High kind of reputation, and was hoping that it was a one-off offence.

Agree, more likely as you stated. If so, whoever in Chinese High deserve to be investigated for intentionally concealing information. Pretty sure PSC/MOE wants to know the strengths and limitations of its interviewees. The non-disclosure could have been intended so as to protect the brand name of the school.

Just thinking - if Jonathan was caned, surely MOE would have that record. I am sure the schools involved in caning its students need not get clearance to cane but must notify MOE for record purposes. If that was the case, MOE has to shoulder the blame too.
 
No, you're reiterating the PAP style. When they screw up, let's forget it and move on. When things work out, it's due to the great leadership of the PAP and more bonus to them. Meanwhile, they are paid millions no matter what happens.

LMAO, especially when you have blood ties. You're still good when you fuck up big time.
 
Is he related Wong Cunt Sing?:eek: Possibility quite high hor!:rolleyes: MOE nvr check cos' of reltionship to Wong Cunt Sing what!



paedophile jonathan wong kena caned before in sec school for peeping at female students and teachers....but then he still can get scholarship from moe......i tot to get scholarship MOE will look at the student record ........:confused::mad:

奖学金得主有前科 中学偷窥公开被鞭


20101119_km_lcn_porn_scholar_img_main.jpg


因制作和拥有儿童色情片的狮城奖学金得主,中学时期曾因偷窥被校方公开鞭打。

《联合晚报》昨天报道,留学英国著名学府约克大学的23岁狮城教育部奖学金得主Jonathan Wong,因为被当地警方查出电脑里有50个儿童色情录像,结果被控上法庭。

据前同学爆料,中学时期就读本地名校华侨中学的被告,曾因偷窥而被校方严惩,当着师生面前鞭打他。据了解,被告偷窥的对象是校内的同学或教职员。

被告面对17项控状,他已经认罪,案展12月13日下判。

据另一名同学透露,被告的父母仍不知他出事了。

被告在约克大学主修历史系,目前是第三年学生,住在校园宿舍内。

去年3月,有两名学生在使用大学内部电脑网络时,无意中在音乐播放、储存和分享软件iTunes上发现了充满淫声浪语的猥亵录音,连忙通知校方。

调查后,校方追查到猥亵录音就来自被告,立即报警,被告是在今年3月19日被捕。
 
Back
Top