• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Shanmugam's lawyer send letter to Alex Au, attempt to trace Scroobal unsuccessful

SAMMYBOY traffic going to shoot thru the roof!!!!! :D i tink this is a dumb move by shanmugam. coz now more ppl interested in his private life. :cool:

It's called the Streisand effect. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect

I did a check and "Shanmugam Divorce" has been hot on google.com.sg all morning!

Demanding that the letter be published on yawning bread is a big mistake.

Streisand effect
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


The image of Streisand's Malibu house that led to the naming of the effect
17px-WMA_button2b.png
34.015046°N 118.791148°W


The Streisand effect is a primarily online phenomenon in which an attempt to hide or remove a piece of information has the unintended consequence of publicizing the information more widely. It is named after American entertainer Barbra Streisand, whose attempt in 2003 to suppress photographs of her residence inadvertently generated further publicity.

Similar attempts have been made, for example, in cease-and-desist letters, to suppress numbers, files and websites. Instead of being suppressed, the information receives extensive publicity and media extensions such as videos & spoof songs, often being widely mirrored across the Internet or distributed on file-sharing networks.[SUP][1][/SUP][SUP][2][/SUP]

Mike Masnick of Techdirt coined the term after Streisand, citing privacy violations, unsuccessfully sued photographer Kenneth Adelman and Pictopia.com for US$50 million in an attempt to have an aerial photograph of her mansion removed from the publicly available collection of 12,000 California coastline photographs.[SUP][1][/SUP][SUP][3][/SUP][SUP][4][/SUP] Adelman said that he was photographing beachfront property to document coastal erosion as part of the government sanctioned and commissioned California Coastal Records Project.[SUP][5][/SUP][SUP][6][/SUP]

Before Streisand filed her lawsuit, "Image 3850" had been downloaded from Adelman's website only 6 times; two of those downloads were by Streisand's attorneys.[SUP][7][/SUP] As a result of the case, public knowledge of the picture increased substantially; more than 420,000 people visited the site over the following month.[SUP][8][/SUP]
 
It's called the Streisand effect. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect

I did a check and "Shanmugam Divorce" has been hot on google.com.sg all morning!

Demanding that the letter be published on yawning bread is a big mistake.


where got?
http://www.google.com.sg/trends/hottrends?sa=X


Feb 15, 2012 - change date
Updated 1 minute ago

iGoogle Gadget New! Site Feed

1. ming bridges
2. total defence day
3. singapore airshow
4. malaysia super league 2012
5. far east flora
6. singtel
7. restaurant week singapore
8. fullerton hotel
9. lionsxii
10. nus plans mass student walkout
11. bangkok bomb
12. singapore vs perak
13. nick vujicic married
14. meaning of roses
15. yaongsub
16. lions xii vs perak
17. avenged sevenfold singapore
18. lions 12
19. jack s place
20. friendship day

Google Trends provides insights into broad search patterns. Please keep in mind that several approximations are used when computing these results.
 
If there is free press and freedom of speech in Singapore scrobool won't be in SBF hiding in nicks.

One to be a clean society? Clean up your own mess and free the press and freedom of Singapore. If not it is just kong lanjiao wei.



a subpoena or warrant from a court order would break all protection around strong vpn anonymity. authorities have the wherewithal to deep dive into details if they choose to or are ordered to do so. there's no hiding on this friggin planet if it's an international cooperative effort. north korea, afghanistan, cuba or iran may be better bets in getting offline and not having your last activity traced. since this is a civil case, it will not garner the best resources and assistance from cyber teams.

in sg, the traceability is tight. even if a forummer runs around from internet cafe to hotspots and use someone else's laptop to post libelous content, the ida in sg with the help of isp's has methodically pinned traceability down to a subscriber, user, organization, or enterprise. tetherers need permission from account owners or their associates to get access to the internet in sg. the owner of the account may be innocent, clueless or ignorant of a tetherer's posting on the internet, and he she may be forgiven or waived but will be asked to assist in investigations. sooner or later, someone will snitch and reveal identities. that's how hackers are caught even if they float around and rely on someone else's access to the web.
 
It's called the Streisand effect. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect

I did a check and "Shanmugam Divorce" has been hot on google.com.sg all morning!

Demanding that the letter be published on yawning bread is a big mistake.

omgomgomg :eek: ah sam the almighty quoted my post!! :D

so..anyone knw who is shanmugam's ex-wife? :D pretty a not?? y divorce????? issit due to shanmugam's extra marital affairs??? :eek:

wonder hw much alimony did the ex-wife ask for????? shanmugam is worth millions!! woman charter at work ..so ex-wife shld milk as much as possible??????? :p
 
where got?

Sorry I didn't make it clear... It's key words that lead to this forum. Foo Mee Har has shot up the ranking now. This is the snapshot for the last 2 minutes.

[TABLE="class: standard wrap-table fixed-by-header"]
<tbody>[TR]
[TD="align: right"]17.31%[/TD]
[TD]foo mee har[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: odd"]
[TD="align: right"]9.62%[/TD]
[TD]scroobal[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: right"]7.69%[/TD]
[TD]scroobal shanmugam[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: odd"]
[TD="align: right"]5.77%[/TD]
[TD]sam's alfaresco coffee[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: right"]3.85%[/TD]
[TD]chrissie chau sex[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: odd"]
[TD="align: right"]3.85%[/TD]
[TD]ownership in private property do they check[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: right"]3.85%[/TD]
[TD]sammy forum[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: odd"]
[TD="align: right"]3.85%[/TD]
[TD]sammyboy[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: right"]3.85%[/TD]
[TD]sammyboy.com[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: odd"]
[TD="align: right"]1.92%[/TD]
[TD] site:sammyboy.com scroobal>shanmugam[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: right"]1.92%[/TD]
[TD]3d night village sex photos[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: odd"]
[TD="align: right"]1.92%[/TD]
[TD]70 and 80 music[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: right"]1.92%[/TD]
[TD]Cecilia Sue[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: odd"]
[TD="align: right"]1.92%[/TD]
[TD]cheapo taiwan[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: right"]1.92%[/TD]
[TD]forum on online prostitution[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: odd"]
[TD="align: right"]1.92%[/TD]
[TD]hkbluefilm[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: right"]1.92%[/TD]
[TD]how to make a shoe camera[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: odd"]
[TD="align: right"]1.92%[/TD]
[TD]hua kuok kerry[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: right"]1.92%[/TD]
[TD]k shanmugam and foo mee har[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: odd"]
[TD="align: right"]1.92%[/TD]
[TD]k shanmugam wife divorce[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: right"]1.92%[/TD]
[TD]low wei jie[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: odd"]
[TD="align: right"]1.92%[/TD]
[TD]national geographic channel dog adoption[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: right"]1.92%[/TD]
[TD]Ong Ye Kung[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: odd"]
[TD="align: right"]1.92%[/TD]
[TD]sammyboy blog shanmugam[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: right"]1.92%[/TD]
[TD]sammyboy online vice[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: odd"]
[TD="align: right"]1.92%[/TD]
[TD]scroobal on shanmugam[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: right"]1.92%[/TD]
[TD]shanmugam and foo mee har[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: odd"]
[TD="align: right"]1.92%[/TD]
[TD]shanmugam foo mee har[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: right"]1.92%[/TD]
[TD]Shanmugam sammy scroobal[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: odd"]
[TD="align: right"]1.92%[/TD]
[TD]sroobal[/TD]
[/TR]
</tbody>[/TABLE]
 
Strange why so many searches lead to this forum as the last post by Scroobal on this subject was more than a year ago. Google spiders must be super efficient.
 
I wonder if there is a reward for the information on Scroobal, who will let go har?
 
Mr Shanmugam dares to sue because the allegations about him are false.
Mr Yaw dares not sue because the allegations about him are probably true.

PAP will not keep silent on allegations.
WP will keep silent on allegations.
 
It will be even more inetersting if the nick is his own name, the name of his wife or that of his ex-girlfriend.
Scroobal famous liao....I wonder if the nick in question is named 'motherfucker' or 'chowcheebye', would they still include it on the letter
 
Scroobal famous liao....
I wonder if the nick in question is named 'motherfucker' or 'chowcheebye', would they still include it on the letter

Good point...LOL...imagine legal case reference:

XXX vs ChowCheeBye 2012 or XXX vs KANBOO 2012 ...local law students will laugh their balls off during case study and lectures.
 
Shamugam lawyer letter really scares the shit out of Dr Joseph Ong. TRE busy deleting comments abt shanmugam, and had asked readers not to comment about him any more. Dr Ong and other TRE members are really shitting in their pants right now, volunteering to do self-censorship, hoping not to receive Allen & Glenhill's letter. :rolleyes:

1537jsy.jpg
 
Last edited:
The timing of Shanmugam's decision to sue is strange. Why after YSL's subject emerged?
 
Mr Shanmugam dares to sue because the allegations about him are false.
Mr Yaw dares not sue because the allegations about him are probably true.

PAP will not keep silent on allegations.
WP will keep silent on allegations.

not true, remember SPH was sued by the TT durai..
 
BOSS BOSS! if got receive lawyer letter remember to publish it let us see! wahahahahhaha
 
Shamugam lawyer letter really scares the shit out of Dr Joseph Ong. TRE busy deleting comments abt shanmugam, and had asked readers not to comment about him any more. Dr Ong and other TRE members are really shitting in their pants right now, volunteering to do self-censorship, hoping not to receive Allen & Glenhill's letter. :rolleyes:

1537jsy.jpg
repeating or commenting on this also liable to be sued? Knn machiam thai lest majeste law leh.....any lawyers to verify if this is true? Can sued all the netizens?
 
repeating or commenting on this also liable to be sued? Knn machiam thai lest majeste law leh.....any lawyers to verify if this is true? Can sued all the netizens?

Can find first then sue :D, hence exposing oneself or being exposed in this forum is a big no no and has done nothing good for them ever since. To name a few examples

Ivebert
Madcow (GMS lor!)
Kojakbt
 
Strange why so many searches lead to this forum as the last post by Scroobal on this subject was more than a year ago. Google spiders must be super efficient.

That's how spammers ended up here looking for opportunities to advertise their stuffs. A lot of copy and paste news here. One example is you copy a paragraph of football news onto Google and sammyboy appears. :eek:
 
scroobal now trending in google.com.sg

http://www.google.com.sg/trends/hottrends?sa=X

1. ming bridges
2. malaysia super league 2012
3. scroobal
4. singapore airshow 2012
5. foo mee har
6. yawning bread
7. total defence day
8. lionsxii
9. singapore air show
10. singtel
11. far east flora
12. fullerton hotel
13. nus plans mass student walkout
14. crohn’s disease
15. singapore vs perak
16. airasia booking
17. nick vujicic married
18. rolls royce singapore
19. restaurant week singapore
20. number of roses meaning
 
Last edited:
Back
Top