I see that people here have not connected the dots. Here they are.
(1) The Law Minister gives a call late night to someone he himself would later term "A FELLOW LAWYER", Mr Choo Zheing Xi Remy. Part of the phone call's intention was to get Choo to convey to his friends and associates that he would not hesitate to SUE anyone who reposts the SAID ARTICLE.
(2) Choo conveys the message to some fellows, including Miss Spuddings.
(3) Miss Spuddings, with Choo's agreement, decides to disclose what happened whilst not mentioning Choo, because she felt that a late night call to talk about sueing people is not how supposedly 1st world politicians are to behave.
(4) The Law Minister upon being queried by Miss Spudding's article, decided to close the loop. He tells the same story, but from quite a different angle. He even goes so far as to suggest a very friendly relationship with Choo, almost like a friendship.
(5) Netizens pounce on Miss Spuddings because now she appears to be the one giving misleading info. This includes someone by the name of Mr Calvin Cheng, the stepson of the cousin of the uncle of the father of the inventor of Calvin Klein underwear. Mr Cheng attacks Miss Spuddings for "posted a twisted truth in self-righteousness".
(6) Whilst Miss Spuddings is receiving the heat and choo rushes in to protect, his ID is now exposed. People now know Choo is the one who got the dreaded call.
(7) Politiciking complete. The Law Minister gets what he wants - netizens to take down the SAID ARTICLE, for fear of legal reprisals. And, to make things better, the people the heart of it - Choo and Miss Spuddings - are now busy having to defend themselves from PAP IB attacks.
(8) DO YOU GUYS NOW SEE HOW POLITICS WORKS IN SINGAPORE?