Shameful and Despicable PAP Regime Justice System

[gingerlyn]

Dear brothers and sisters,

do you find this similar?

On Tuesday, Justice Choo gave his decision, dismissing the application. He said he was bound by the Court of Appeal's decision in the case of Jasbir Singh in 1994, in which the highest court ruled that an arrested person's constitutional right to counsel did not mean that he was entitled to counsel immediately after his arrest. James Raj also faces four charges for drug consumption.

http://www.straitstimes.com/breakin...ged-hackers-application-immediate-access-coun

In 1992, Chan Sek Keong was appointed Attorney-General of Singapore. Acting in this capacity in 1997, he submitted an opinion to the Government of Singapore that although the Parliamentary Elections Act forbade unauthorized persons to loiter within 200 metres of polling stations on polling day, this did not apply to unauthorized persons who were inside the stations.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chan_Sek_Keong

 

[Asterix]

Sinkies get kind of Gahbrament they deserve
Dis also applies to Judiciary
If they value lift upgrading above rule of law
They got their just deserts

Top justice officials back independence of Hong Kong courts

The two most senior figures in Hong Kong's judicial system yesterday defended the independence of the courts in the face of calls by Beijing officials for more "co-operation" between the three branches of government and public abuse of judges.

Chief Justice Geoffrey Ma Tao-li said public confidence in the judiciary's integrity rested "on a truly independent judiciary, judges who look no further than the proper application of the law, both in letter and in spirit, and the importance of ensuring transparency in all that the courts do in order to demonstrate the integrity of the law". Meanwhile, Secretary for Justice Rimsky Yuen Kwok-keung lambasted people who he said had resorted to "abusive attacks" on judges for reaching decisions with which they did not agree.

He added that "true respect of the rule of law" meant people should exercise their rights within the boundaries permitted by the law. The pair were speaking at the opening ceremony for the 2014 legal year.

Asked about Beijing officials' view that there ought to be "co-operation" between the executive, legislature and judiciary, Ma said the Basic Law stipulated clearly and repeatedly that Hong Kong exercised separation of these powers.

Liaison office propaganda chief Hao Tiechuan last year poured cold water on the idea that Hong Kong exercised separation of powers because the chief executive had more power than the legislature and the judiciary. Rejecting "abusive attacks" on judges, Yuen said: "Some have even indicated that they would compile a list of judges whom they considered politically biased and would request their removal.

"However well-intended their subjective motives might be, such conduct should not be encouraged," he said.

"Deliberate attempts to act in breach of the law, even for causes which may sound noble, should not be encouraged."

Radical lawmaker "Long Hair" Leung Kwok-hung last year called for a "civil monitor" on judges' performance after several magistrates' sentences on protesters were reduced on appeal.

The top court sparked controversy last month by ruling that new immigrants no longer had to wait seven years to receive welfare benefits. Without addressing any particular case, Ma described certain public law cases as difficult and a test to "the demarcation lines between the legislature, the executive and the judiciary". But he said the constitutional line was clear. "Courts and judges deal only with the legal issues arising in the disputes that come before them and we determine only these legal issues."

Ma remained tight-lipped on political topics including public nominations for the chief executive and the Occupy Central civil disobedience plan. He said they were "hypothetical" and it was beyond his constitutional role to comment.

Bar Association chairman Paul Shieh Wing-tai said if the government wanted to reject a Basic Law-compliant reform proposal on political grounds, it should "call a spade a spade".

He added: "What we do not want to see is for political objections to be presented as legal objections."

http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/...-officials-back-independence-hong-kong-courts

 

[tanwahtiu]

Oh well, when a tua pai kia, tyrant with a legal profession and run the country like a dictator, all the civil departments have to bow down to him 怕他三分. When he paid them millions they become dogs to this master.

There is only 2 things that could get rid of a tyrant ruler, kill him or pray hard he died in an accident or old age.

Dear brothers and sisters,

do you find this similar?

On Tuesday, Justice Choo gave his decision, dismissing the application. He said he was bound by the Court of Appeal's decision in the case of Jasbir Singh in 1994, in which the highest court ruled that an arrested person's constitutional right to counsel did not mean that he was entitled to counsel immediately after his arrest. James Raj also faces four charges for drug consumption.

http://www.straitstimes.com/breakin...ged-hackers-application-immediate-access-coun

In 1992, Chan Sek Keong was appointed Attorney-General of Singapore. Acting in this capacity in 1997, he submitted an opinion to the Government of Singapore that although the Parliamentary Elections Act forbade unauthorized persons to loiter within 200 metres of polling stations on polling day, this did not apply to unauthorized persons who were inside the stations.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chan_Sek_Keong

 

[Leepotism]

Kangarooism is rampant in Singapore.

 

[Leepotism]

 

[singveld]

the opposition who keep complaining about minister and civil servant salary. may i know if they win power, how much pay cut are they going to give themselves and the civil servants?

 

[wMulew]

the opposition who keep complaining about minister and civil servant salary. may i know if they win power, how much pay cut are they going to give themselves and the civil servants?

Only dumbfuck opposition supporting retard will believe they are willing to take a pay cut. Before getting elected, WP demand minister pay cut. After GE2011, during ministerial Salary debate, WP ask to give minister 1M annual pay

 

[Asterix]

Kangarooism is rampant in Singapore.

Sinkieland has lots to learn from another former British colony:

[video=youtube;UWk-V3JVPm4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWk-V3JVPm4[/video]

 

[AhMeng]

The justice system is filled with PAP porlumpars lah...

 

[escher]

Hang all those corrupt stinking kangaroos in the AG , the High and Supreme courts of stinkapore with piano wires from lamp posts

 

[chonburifc]

the opposition who keep complaining about minister and civil servant salary. may i know if they win power, how much pay cut are they going to give themselves and the civil servants?

U worry when u lose your job to chow shit skins first. Tua kang yao siu. Show me your house toilet leh. why? Hdb ok lah, me ever stay before leh. why u so ashame of hdb arh?

 

[chonburifc]

the opposition who keep complaining about minister and civil servant salary. may i know if they win power, how much pay cut are they going to give themselves and the civil servants?

Ah chon like singveld tua kang yao siu posts leh. Hehehehe

 

[gingerlyn]

Dear Senior Emeritus Counsel Wong Meng Meng please comment the above

 

[singveld]

the opposition supporters cannot answer my simple question.
next time in your meeting pls ask your leaders in event of election victory the pay cuts for ministers and civil servants, including judges, police and army generals etc in their manifesto. i am very interested to know.

i keep hearing opposition supporters here complaining about ministers million dollars salaries. tell us your solutions.

 

[winnipegjets]

Dear brothers and sisters,

do you find this similar?

On Tuesday, Justice Choo gave his decision, dismissing the application. He said he was bound by the Court of Appeal's decision in the case of Jasbir Singh in 1994, in which the highest court ruled that an arrested person's constitutional right to counsel did not mean that he was entitled to counsel immediately after his arrest. James Raj also faces four charges for drug consumption.

http://www.straitstimes.com/breakin...ged-hackers-application-immediate-access-coun

In 1992, Chan Sek Keong was appointed Attorney-General of Singapore. Acting in this capacity in 1997, he submitted an opinion to the Government of Singapore that although the Parliamentary Elections Act forbade unauthorized persons to loiter within 200 metres of polling stations on polling day, this did not apply to unauthorized persons who were inside the stations.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chan_Sek_Keong

Only sinkees can understand this kind of rationale. No wonder that sinkees are taught of as dumb.

 

[WongMengMeng]

I will just say that Choo what’s his name and dare I say many other Sinkie judges do not understand the following passages from Lord Diplock’s judgement in Ong Ah Chuan v PP, which went all the way to the Privy Council:


… the Lordships would repeat what this Board has said on many previous occasions …. that the way to interpret a constitution on the Westminster model is to treat it not as if it were an Act of Parliament but `as sui generis, calling for principles of interpretation of its own, suitable to its character ... without necessary acceptance of all the presumptions that are relevant to legislation of private law`. ... their Lordships would give to Pt IV of the Singapore Constitution `a generous interpretation, avoiding what has been called `the austerity of tabulated legalism`, suitable to give to individuals the full measure of the [fundamental liberties] referred to`.

……..

In a constitution founded on the Westminster model and particularly in that part of it that purports to assure to all individual citizens the continued enjoyment of fundamental liberties or rights, references to `law` in such contexts as `in accordance with law`, `equality before the law`, `protection of the law` and the like, in their Lordships` view, refer to a system of law which incorporates those fundamental rules of natural justice that had formed part and parcel of the common law of England that was in operation in Singapore at the commencement of the Constitution. It would have been taken for granted by the makers of the Constitution that the `law` to which citizens could have recourse for the protection of fundamental liberties assured to them by the Constitution would be a system of law that did not flout those fundamental rules. If it were otherwise it would be misuse of language to speak of law as something which affords `protection` for the individual in the enjoyment of his fundamental liberties, and the purported entrenchment (by art 5) of arts 9(1) and 12(1) would be little better than a mockery.

Is it any wonder then that Choo what's his name and other Sinkie judges are being mocked?

 

[escher]

Hang all those corrupt stinking kangaroos in the AG , the High and Supreme courts of stinkapore with piano wires from lamp posts

Hang those stinking corrupt kangaroos again

 

[WongMengMeng]

In a constitution founded on the Westminster model and particularly in that part of it that purports to assure to all individual citizens the continued enjoyment of fundamental liberties or rights, references to `law` in such contexts as `in accordance with law`, `equality before the law`, `protection of the law` and the like, in their Lordships` view, refer to a system of law which incorporates those fundamental rules of natural justice that had formed part and parcel of the common law of England that was in operation in Singapore at the commencement of the Constitution. It would have been taken for granted by the makers of the Constitution that the `law` to which citizens could have recourse for the protection of fundamental liberties assured to them by the Constitution would be a system of law that did not flout those fundamental rules. If it were otherwise it would be misuse of language to speak of law as something which affords `protection` for the individual in the enjoyment of his fundamental liberties, and the purported entrenchment (by art 5) of arts 9(1) and 12(1) would be little better than a mockery.[/I]

Is it any wonder then that Choo what's his name and other Sinkie judges are being mocked?

Young Sinkie lawyers should start a similar campaign. Hard to imagine that the people on this link (http://www.lawsociety.org.sg/AboutUs/OrganisationStructure/Council.aspx) will do it, since 10 out of 21 have a # or * or ^ next to their name. Which means:

*Statutory member appointed by the Council under section 48(1)(c) Legal Profession Act
#Statutory member appointed by the Minister under section 48(1)(b) Legal Profession Act
^Member appointed by the Council pursuant to section 53(1) Legal Profession Act

Even if these Sinkie lawyers do manage to launch such a campaign, please bear in mind what their Malaysian counterpart said to the ordinary citizen @ 5:00 “Make no mistake though, this campaign is not going to fight your battles for you. We want to help you educate yourself on the Constitution, on your rights, so that YOU can fight your own battles.”

[video=youtube;NStQXZ7T95w]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NStQXZ7T95w[/video]

 

[WongMengMeng]

Young Sinkie lawyers should start a similar campaign. Hard to imagine that the people on this link (http://www.lawsociety.org.sg/AboutUs/OrganisationStructure/Council.aspx) will do it, since 10 out of 21 have a # or * or ^ next to their name. Which means:

*Statutory member appointed by the Council under section 48(1)(c) Legal Profession Act
#Statutory member appointed by the Minister under section 48(1)(b) Legal Profession Act
^Member appointed by the Council pursuant to section 53(1) Legal Profession Act

Oops, counted wrongly, it should be 11 out of 21. Which means a majority of this damn Council has not been properly elected. What the fuck, even the Law Society Council is not democratic! Sinkieland is doomed! Run road before it's too late!

 

[gingerlyn]

PAP is a shameful and despicable scum and it seems that judges are more vocal nowadays when PAP is weak.

Appeal judge condemns Singapore judiciary system and Attorney General Chamber today. You do not see such AGC behaviour when Prof Walter Woon was AG. Who is the AG now? it is so shameful and despicable.

Appeal judge calls for steps to avoid troubling situation in appeals


An appeal judge has called for measures to be taken to avoid future situations in which an offender has served his jail term, or a good part of it, before his appeal is heard.

One way this could be done is to grant bail to an offender once the prosecution appeals, said Justice Chao Hick Tin. He added that this was an area that warrants legislative attention, given the potential unfairness that can arise.

Justice Chao made the remarks in his written judgment, published on Friday, in the case of three national servicemen who went on a stealing spree at a police station.

Saiful Rizam Assim, Muhammad Erman Iman Tauhid, Muhammad Yunus Aziz, were sentenced to between seven months and 11/2 years by a district court in April last year. The prosecution appealed, arguing for a sentence of reformative training instead. Justice Chao, who said he had been "troubled" by the case, said he felt they should have been sent for reformative training. But he eventually decided against it as it would amount to "double punishment" for the trio.