SUMMARY OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW BASIS
Raymond Ng's Affidavit.
What’s Going On?
Raymond Ng and Iris Koh are asking the court to review the actions of the Health Sciences Authority (HSA). They believe HSA hasn’t followed the rules properly when it comes to companies using celebrities to promote health products like vaccines.
The Issue:
The law says that health products shouldn’t be promoted by celebrities because it can influence people’s health decisions in ways that might not be entirely fair. Despite this, there was an event where celebrities were used to promote vaccines, and Raymond and Iris feel that HSA didn’t investigate this situation properly.
Key Examples:
Think about it like this: If a rule is in place to ensure fairness, it should apply equally to all situations, big or small. For example, you wouldn’t say it’s okay to overlook a minor breach of a rule just because it’s not a major one. Raymond and Iris believe that promoting a category of health products through celebrities should be treated the same way as promoting a single product, following the rules consistently.
Murder Analogy:
Imagine the law says that murdering one person is illegal. It wouldn’t make sense to think that murdering multiple people at once could somehow be less of a crime or even overlooked. The seriousness of the crime doesn’t diminish with more victims; in fact, it increases. Similarly, Raymond and Iris argue that promoting a general category of health products like “vaccination” through celebrities should be treated just as seriously as promoting a specific product.
Rape Analogy:
Another way to think about it is with the crime of rape. Just because someone rapes more than one person at a time doesn’t make it any less illegal than if they committed the crime against just one person. The rules against such serious offenses apply universally, no matter the scale. In the same way, advertising regulations should apply equally to both specific health products and general categories to prevent any undue influence on people’s decisions.
Why It Matters to You:
This case is important because it’s about ensuring that the rules meant to protect us from potentially misleading health information are applied fairly. It affects how health products can be promoted and ensures that decisions about our health are based on solid information, not just celebrity endorsements.
Court’s Role:
The court will decide if HSA needs to look into this matter more closely. The decision will help ensure that health product promotions follow the rules, providing clear and reliable information to the public.
Read more:
https://bit.Iy/jrhsa
Sign our petition:
https://bit.Iy/stophsa
Support us:
PAYNOW 98291678 (Ref: JR)
Stay more for more exciting updates.
t.me/healingthedivide
