• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

[Sg] - Shanmugam angry liao, : "Leave my son out of this! I'm warning you!"

Screenshot_2023-07-05-10-22-58-02_a23b203fd3aafc6dcb84e438dda678b6.jpg


.
 
Satanic verses said:
His son lied about going to oxford.

https://www.sammyboy.com/threads/black-mamba’s-son-ravindran-shanmugam-graduated-from-oxford-brooke’s-not-oxford-university.344243/
Click to expand...
No lah , we heard wrongly,,i admit old liao hearing no good lah...let move on
 
Former Mrs K. Shanmugam:

April 6, 2011 at 11:11 am Former Mrs. K. Shanmugam (Quote)

Shanmugam cheated me, his ex wife. While as an MP and a lawyer and married with 2 kids he was having a sexual relationship with one of his Chinese colleague. I divorced him. Just before his promotion to Minister he quickly went through a quick-bang arranged marriage with an Indian national so as to parade as a married family man Minister.

He is a congenital liar. He can lie without batting an eyelid. He can tell white lies with a straight face. He is very self-centered and completely devoid of remorse. He is more a liar than a lawyer. In fact he is a lying lawyer.

Dear Singapore,

Do you want such a man as your MP and Minister? He had no qualms in cheating me, his wife. Do you trust that he will not cheat Singaporeans and Singapore? Vote him out in whatever SMC or GRC he will be in.
Unquote.
 
Merl Haggard said:
Former Mrs K. Shanmugam:

April 6, 2011 at 11:11 am Former Mrs. K. Shanmugam (Quote)

Shanmugam cheated me, his ex wife. While as an MP and a lawyer and married with 2 kids he was having a sexual relationship with one of his Chinese colleague. I divorced him. Just before his promotion to Minister he quickly went through a quick-bang arranged marriage with an Indian national so as to parade as a married family man Minister.

He is a congenital liar. He can lie without batting an eyelid. He can tell white lies with a straight face. He is very self-centered and completely devoid of remorse. He is more a liar than a lawyer. In fact he is a lying lawyer.

Dear Singapore,

Do you want such a man as your MP and Minister? He had no qualms in cheating me, his wife. Do you trust that he will not cheat Singaporeans and Singapore? Vote him out in whatever SMC or GRC he will be in.
Unquote.
Click to expand...
Did snake Shan sue his ex wife over this post? If not...it means it's a fact.. but this could be a fake post
 
Merl Haggard said:
Former Mrs K. Shanmugam:

April 6, 2011 at 11:11 am Former Mrs. K. Shanmugam (Quote)

Shanmugam cheated me, his ex wife. While as an MP and a lawyer and married with 2 kids he was having a sexual relationship with one of his Chinese colleague. I divorced him. Just before his promotion to Minister he quickly went through a quick-bang arranged marriage with an Indian national so as to parade as a married family man Minister.

He is a congenital liar. He can lie without batting an eyelid. He can tell white lies with a straight face. He is very self-centered and completely devoid of remorse. He is more a liar than a lawyer. In fact he is a lying lawyer.

Dear Singapore,

Do you want such a man as your MP and Minister? He had no qualms in cheating me, his wife. Do you trust that he will not cheat Singaporeans and Singapore? Vote him out in whatever SMC or GRC he will be in.
Unquote.
Click to expand...
The traits exactly LKY was looking for in a guard dog, just like Jeyakumar.
 
Dr Chee

The Parliamentary sitting that exonerated Ministers K Shanmugam and Vivian Balakrishnan was utterly unsatisfactory, raising more questions than it answered.

The anger of the public is palpable and warranted. This is because, one, the PAP has drummed into our minds that land is scarce in Singapore and, therefore, we have to be crammed into small and expensive HDB flats.

But as with the classic adage that “some people are more equal than others”, the two Ministers find themselves living in enormous and opulent properties – properties that citizens can only dream of but are constantly told that we cannot aspire to.

It is especially galling because such contempt for the people is explicitly written by the Singapore Land Authority (SLA) that anyone who wishes to live in such residence must have an income 3 times the bid rent and of “sound financial status”. And who determines the bid rent and financial status? The ministers, of course.

Herein lies the problem. The bids for the bungalows were not made by the Ministers themselves but their wives. Did the SLA determine that the wives also earned at least 3 times the bid rent of $26,000 a month? If not, how did it know that the women were of sound financial status? Was SLA told that they were the wives of the Ministers’? Did this affect the decision-making process?

More importantly, why did Shanmugam and Balakrishnan not apply for the rental in their own names? Did they think it was inappropriate to do so?

Two, PAP Ministers have long been criticised for paying themselves the highest salaries in the world as far as governments are concerned. One of the reasons, or so it has been proffered, is that ministers will not be in want of anything lest they be tempted by corruption.

But as wealthy as they are now and living in houses that the vast majority of Singaporeans cannot afford, the two Ministers had sought to live in even bigger properties.

And all this time, the size of HDB flats has gotten smaller.

The ethics in such a situation is what grates Singaporeans’ sensibilities to the very core. While berating and lecturing the people about living frugally, the PAP continues to demonstrate its hypocrisy with ministers luxuriating in opulence.

And whenever the SDP calls to reduce the prices of flats, the PAP accuses us of wanting to raid the reserves because anything short of the exorbitant prices is tantamount to stealing from future generations.

Again, another example of a broken system of one set of rules for the rulers and another for the ruled.

Third, and perhaps the most disturbing aspect of the saga, is that the rentals were not proactively revealed to the public by the PAP. When Ministers, who are in charge of the government, do private transactions with the government, it should not be whistleblowers who reveal the facts.

It is the Ministers who must volunteer, promptly and forthrightly, the information. Mr Shanmugam and Dr Balakrishnan did none of this.

The biggest indictment of the Ministers may not come in Parliament as the PAP has come out in full-throated support of the two. But, in the minds of the people, the episode carries the stench of hypocrisy of the highest order.

This matter has shown, yet again, that without a strong opposition presence in Parliament, Singaporeans cannot hope to hold the ministers accountable.

To salvage the woeful debacle, only an independent commission of inquiry, one perhaps chaired by a retired judge or law professor, to delve into the case and ask the necessary questions will suffice. Anything less will stoke the public’s resentment even more.
 
tobelightlight said:
Dr Chee

The Parliamentary sitting that exonerated Ministers K Shanmugam and Vivian Balakrishnan was utterly unsatisfactory, raising more questions than it answered.

The anger of the public is palpable and warranted. This is because, one, the PAP has drummed into our minds that land is scarce in Singapore and, therefore, we have to be crammed into small and expensive HDB flats.

But as with the classic adage that “some people are more equal than others”, the two Ministers find themselves living in enormous and opulent properties – properties that citizens can only dream of but are constantly told that we cannot aspire to.

It is especially galling because such contempt for the people is explicitly written by the Singapore Land Authority (SLA) that anyone who wishes to live in such residence must have an income 3 times the bid rent and of “sound financial status”. And who determines the bid rent and financial status? The ministers, of course.

Herein lies the problem. The bids for the bungalows were not made by the Ministers themselves but their wives. Did the SLA determine that the wives also earned at least 3 times the bid rent of $26,000 a month? If not, how did it know that the women were of sound financial status? Was SLA told that they were the wives of the Ministers’? Did this affect the decision-making process?

More importantly, why did Shanmugam and Balakrishnan not apply for the rental in their own names? Did they think it was inappropriate to do so?

Two, PAP Ministers have long been criticised for paying themselves the highest salaries in the world as far as governments are concerned. One of the reasons, or so it has been proffered, is that ministers will not be in want of anything lest they be tempted by corruption.

But as wealthy as they are now and living in houses that the vast majority of Singaporeans cannot afford, the two Ministers had sought to live in even bigger properties.

And all this time, the size of HDB flats has gotten smaller.

The ethics in such a situation is what grates Singaporeans’ sensibilities to the very core. While berating and lecturing the people about living frugally, the PAP continues to demonstrate its hypocrisy with ministers luxuriating in opulence.

And whenever the SDP calls to reduce the prices of flats, the PAP accuses us of wanting to raid the reserves because anything short of the exorbitant prices is tantamount to stealing from future generations.

Again, another example of a broken system of one set of rules for the rulers and another for the ruled.

Third, and perhaps the most disturbing aspect of the saga, is that the rentals were not proactively revealed to the public by the PAP. When Ministers, who are in charge of the government, do private transactions with the government, it should not be whistleblowers who reveal the facts.

It is the Ministers who must volunteer, promptly and forthrightly, the information. Mr Shanmugam and Dr Balakrishnan did none of this.

The biggest indictment of the Ministers may not come in Parliament as the PAP has come out in full-throated support of the two. But, in the minds of the people, the episode carries the stench of hypocrisy of the highest order.

This matter has shown, yet again, that without a strong opposition presence in Parliament, Singaporeans cannot hope to hold the ministers accountable.

To salvage the woeful debacle, only an independent commission of inquiry, one perhaps chaired by a retired judge or law professor, to delve into the case and ask the necessary questions will suffice. Anything less will stoke the public’s resentment even more.
Click to expand...
Game over already chee then talk.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Shanmugam lifts to hold world leecord
2
Replies
20
Views
850
birdie69
B
P
Forigenners dominating SG tech industry
Replies
13
Views
705
bushtucker
bushtucker
P
Chitchat Balls shrinked! Shanmugam worried about global drugs situation
Replies
5
Views
881
batman1
B
P
Serious CNN - Concentration Camp for Sinkie Druggies! Samsters balls got shrinked?
Replies
0
Views
270
Pinkieslut
P
Franjipani
Angry cyclist who screamed at driver that he has ‘more rights’ fined after calling cops
Replies
1
Views
372
bobby
bobby
Back
Top