- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
- Messages
- 643
- Points
- 0
I don't think there's any moral wrongdoing either. If i didn't get the dates wrong, they started having sex only AFTER he went to Sec 1. She is NOT his teacher anymore. Besides, so what if an under 16 has sex, as long as he is willing? With the changing psyche of people today, the underage sex laws need to change. Sex with very young partners has been practised since biblical times.
The court details of their relationship sounds like a real porno movie. Such great potential! "the forbidden love" I'll call it. Sexually frustrated teacher and overaged student. scene 1 in classroom. scene 2 in chalet.
The court details of their relationship sounds like a real porno movie. Such great potential! "the forbidden love" I'll call it. Sexually frustrated teacher and overaged student. scene 1 in classroom. scene 2 in chalet.
Please.
In this age, where any form of information can be obtained from the internet, what makes you think that the boy does not know what he is being led, or getting into?"
The whole point here is, she tried to seduce, he ACCEPTED IT WILLINGLY. So as I have mentioned before, if he is not willing, NOTHING she does will entice him at all.
So, why is everybody thinking that the teacher is to be condemned and the boy is the innocent victim, when CLEARLY, it's not the case?
What the teacher teaches in school has got no bearing or whatsoever to what she chooses to do.