Scathing article raises numerous questions about sale of Shanmugam's GCB for a staggering 88mil to ultra secretive buyer

[Papsmearer]

The useless local born sinkies are still stuck in their kampong days mentality and don't know anything about the world around them, can't count on them to take out a corrupted government just let them sink

Yup, they are not worth saving

 

[Papsmearer]

U want to stir this? He is not the first, not the last. U never know how deep.the rabbit hole is, probably lead all the way to Ah gua loong

Hahahaha, lead all the way to Old fart. Nassim Jade condo discount. Even got a free Lexus LS 400 from the Japanese govt after he "retired" as PeeM and then later came back as SM. Put in his DIL to collect millions of $ salary from Stomachsick Holdings, etc.

 

[Papsmearer]

You are brilliant, to be able to consider such a scenario.
And I believe that it may be a possible scenario.

Sinkies are too stupid to consider such a scenario, and there are even worse scenarios in singapore.

 

[Papsmearer]

Because Sham is a senior Minister in the cabinet of Singapore, any sale of his assets of such a large magnitude must appear to be clean and transparent. He must be prepared to disclose voluntarily the following:

1) This is an arms length transaction between buyer and seller who have no previous knowledge of each other
2) The buyer must agree to disclosure of his or her name and not hide behind a trust or company or nominee
3) Given that all govts in the world are fighting money laundering now, and given that Singapore is in the midst of serious money laundering cases, the Law Minister himself should must disclose what measures he took to ensure that this is not a case of someone trying to launder his money by paying a high valuation for the Minister's house
4) The Minister should disclose the independent appraisal used by the bank to show the valuation of his house, including comparables of similar recently sold bungalows. In other words, if the bank valuation is $50 million, the seller paid $88 million, we have a problem.

 

[mojito]

Because Sham is a senior Minister in the cabinet of Singapore, any sale of his assets of such a large magnitude must appear to be clean and transparent. He must be prepared to disclose voluntarily the following:

1) This is an arms length transaction between buyer and seller who have no previous knowledge of each other
2) The buyer must agree to disclosure of his or her name and not hide behind a trust or company or nominee
3) Given that all govts in the world are fighting money laundering now, and given that Singapore is in the midst of serious money laundering cases, the Law Minister himself should must disclose what measures he took to ensure that this is not a case of someone trying to launder his money by paying a high valuation for the Minister's house
4) The Minister should disclose the independent appraisal used by the bank to show the valuation of his house, including comparables of similar recently sold bungalows. In other words, if the bank valuation is $50 million, the seller paid $88 million, we have a problem.

Dun worry. Pitam sing will raise these very important questions during the next parley men sitting. To this spell rumours once and for all dose who say he is mole.

 

[Papsmearer]

Dun worry. Pitam sing will raise these very important questions during the next parley men sitting. To this spell rumours once and for all dose who say he is mole.

hahhahhahha, Pritam will be kwai kwai like the PAP dog he is

 

[Taylorshit]

Somehow I feel Pritam isn't quite worth his salt in parleement these days, maybe he's too bothered by Raeesah's case

 

[spinn]

lol who u trying to con ?? show the proof

Good minister Shan already proven to be innocent white as snow. Samsters looking to get sued for defamation?

 

[nightsafari]

The useless local born sinkies are still stuck in their kampong days mentality and don't know anything about the world around them, can't count on them to take out a corrupted government just let them sink

absolutely spot on!

 

[Charlie99]

Sinkies are too stupid to consider such a scenario, and there are even worse scenarios in singapore.

Which is one of the reasons that I believe that those who are eligible to vote, should consider and take all the necessary steps, including persuading and convincing their family members, relatives and friends, to vote for those individuals who are not with the ruling party, to ensure that the MIW do not form two thirds of the Parliament, to ensure that the current ruling party or any party do not make amendments to the Singapore Constitution to suit its agenda (such as GRC, elected President, reserved Presidential elections, setting arbitrary criteria for the eligibility of Presidential candidates, whereas any adult born in Singapore should be eligible)

 

[oliverlee]

Which is one of the reasons that I believe that those who are eligible to vote, should consider and take all the necessary steps, including persuading and convincing their family members, relatives and friends, to vote for those individuals who are not with the ruling party, to ensure that the MIW do not form two thirds of the Parliament, to ensure that the current ruling party or any party do not make amendments to the Songapore Constitution to suit its agenda (such as GRC, elected President, reserved Presidential elections, setting arbitrary criteria for the eligibility of Presidential candidates, whereas any adult born in Singapore should be eligible)

no one will bother. These gong cheebais will do everything to vote in white panties to safeguard their HDB flats. No wonder even bangalahs sweeping the void decks spit at the average Sinkie

 

[Papsmearer]

Somehow I feel Pritam isn't quite worth his salt in parleement these days, maybe he's too bothered by Raeesah's case

WP is Waynag PArty, aka PAP Lite. U don't know meh?

 

[Hypocrite-The]

WP is Waynag PArty, aka PAP Lite. U don't know meh?

I have given up on the wankers since they won Aljunied..

 

[Hypocrite-The]

WP is Waynag PArty, aka PAP Lite. U don't know meh?

I have given up on the wankers since they won Aljunied

 

[KingFook Sr]

Numbers don't lie
Look at the numbers and you can feel, see .... corruption.

 

[NanoSpeed]

Dun worry. Pitam sing will raise these very important questions during the next parley men sitting. To this spell rumours once and for all dose who say he is mole.

You should study PS employment history before he became MP.

LKY attacked CST 'O' level results. PS had zero work experience and surprisingly ST did not pick up on that and the Opinion Asia website.

 

[birdie69]

If Ah Wong is smart...he will use this as the excuse to get rid of the black snake..n it will make him more popular n prevent him from getting bitten

How about the opposition parties, can they capitalise it to gain more votes and win more constituencies?

 

[birdie69]

What irked me was how they had the gall to elevate that ultra useless murali to a minister of state....

They might make him future law minister lol

 

[birdie69]

WP is Waynag PArty, aka PAP Lite. U don't know meh?

I did not think so when Low Thia Kiang was in charge

 

[birdie69]

Because Sham is a senior Minister in the cabinet of Singapore, any sale of his assets of such a large magnitude must appear to be clean and transparent. He must be prepared to disclose voluntarily the following:

1) This is an arms length transaction between buyer and seller who have no previous knowledge of each other
2) The buyer must agree to disclosure of his or her name and not hide behind a trust or company or nominee
3) Given that all govts in the world are fighting money laundering now, and given that Singapore is in the midst of serious money laundering cases, the Law Minister himself should must disclose what measures he took to ensure that this is not a case of someone trying to launder his money by paying a high valuation for the Minister's house
4) The Minister should disclose the independent appraisal used by the bank to show the valuation of his house, including comparables of similar recently sold bungalows. In other words, if the bank valuation is $50 million, the seller paid $88 million, we have a problem.

How about the details of the buyer?