Sam Leong's band of brothers - cyclists

[Hypocrite-The]

Cyclist who reported driver for using his mobile phone accused of breaking the law
Dave Clifton has been charged with riding a cycle on a road without due care and attention
0 seconds of 0 seconds
5 hours ago
A cyclist who reported a driver for using his mobile phone at the wheel has found himself being accused of breaking the law.

Dave Clifton, 56, spotted a Range Rover driver holding a phone handset while he was cycling through Belgravia, and he captured the incident on his helmet camera.

But after submitting the video clip to police, they claimed the cyclist had been riding on the wrong side of the road, and suggested that he “could pose a danger to other road users”.

Mr Clifton, from south-west London, has been charged with riding a cycle on a road without due care and attention. He intends to fight the claim at a trial next month.

“It is ludicrous. I don’t know if it is malicious or incompetence,” he told the Standard, branding the case against him “petty”.

The only evidence in the case is Mr Clifton’s own video footage, and he insists it shows he was not on the wrong side of the road.

In the video, Mr Clifton is riding along Pont Street in Belgravia at just after 1.30pm on August 22 last year when he spots the Range Rover driving in the opposite direction. The cyclist then turns around to capture the driver using his mobile phone while at the wheel.


Mr Clifton was cycling through Belgravia when he noticed the driver
Dave Clifton
Natasha Springford, a Met police staff member in the traffic division, claims the cyclist is “in the middle of the road” and is then “very close to the Range Rover on the opposite side of the road whilst a motorcyclist is oncoming with a passenger”.

She continues: “You can see the cyclist cycling towards the oncoming motorbike that is filtering between traffic,” and then suggests the motorbike has to “ride in between the cyclist that is very close and the Range Rover”.

This is called retribution

 

[LITTLEREDDOT]

 

[LITTLEREDDOT]

 

[LITTLEREDDOT]

 

[Hypocrite-The]

Isn't that criminal intimidation?

 

[LITTLEREDDOT]

Forum: Act against cyclists who ignore traffic lights​

APR 16, 2024

I recently came across a police notice asking for witnesses in a case where a collision with a cyclist at a traffic light led to the death of a pedestrian.
I wonder why many cyclists frequently ignore red lights and ride through them with impunity.
As a regular cyclist, I invariably call out such behaviour, usually when I have stopped at a red signal and see others carrying on blithely.
I was at Woodlands Road early one morning recently and witnessed a close call when a cyclist travelling at speed ignored a red light and almost collided with a pedestrian crossing on the green-man signal.
Were it not for the pedestrian’s quick reflexes, he would have been another road accident statistic.
If drivers who are also cyclists would never consider ignoring a set of traffic lights, how does it make sense to do so on a bicycle when the only protection afforded is a plastic helmet and a millimetre or two of lycra?
Could the issue of cyclists running red lights be partly related to a lack of enforcement? I wonder how often cyclists are booked for doing so.

I suspect that if the Traffic Police were to run a short campaign, perhaps stationing themselves along roads frequented by early-morning weekend cyclists and issuing warnings where warranted, word would quickly get around as the cycling community in Singapore is fairly tight-knit.
If the Traffic Police could conduct spot checks for drink driving at night, why not do something similar to prevent cyclists from ignoring traffic signals?
I believe law-abiding cyclists would welcome steps to enforce traffic laws because the sooner cyclists who break the rules are brought into line, the sooner drivers will accept that cyclists have a legitimate right to be on the road and treat them more respectfully.
That must surely be an outcome that would benefit all road users.

Wong Ee Wai

 

[LITTLEREDDOT]

Isn't that criminal intimidation?

At the least: being a public nuisance

 

[LITTLEREDDOT]

 

[LITTLEREDDOT]

 

[LITTLEREDDOT]

 

[LITTLEREDDOT]

 

[LITTLEREDDOT]

 

[LITTLEREDDOT]

 

[LITTLEREDDOT]

 

[LITTLEREDDOT]

 

[LITTLEREDDOT]

22 cyclists caught for flouting riding rules​

The cyclists were caught for offences such as riding in a group size larger than 10 and riding non-compliant devices. PHOTOS: LAND TRANSPORT AUTHORITY/FACEBOOK

Christie Chiu

MAY 07, 2024

SINGAPORE - Twenty-two cyclists were caught committing riding-related offences over the past two weeks in a joint enforcement operation by the Land Transport Authority (LTA) and Traffic Police (TP).
In a Facebook post on May 6, LTA said the cyclists were caught committing offences such as riding in a group size larger than 10 and riding non-compliant devices.
The agency reminded cyclists to ensure that their devices comply with existing requirements and to observe the group length limit.
The group length limit is a total of five cyclists riding in a single file, or 10 cyclists riding two abreast and maintaining a minimum distance of 30m, or two lamp posts, between groups on the roads.
LTA said it would “continue to enforce against errant active mobility users who endanger others with their irresponsible behaviour”, adding that all active mobility device users must adhere to road traffic and active mobility rules at all times.
A fine of $150 is meted out for road cyclists who flout the rule on group size, LTA and TP said previously. It is also issued for cyclists who run the red light, ride on expressways, or ride abreast of another cyclist along single-lane roads and bus lanes during bus lane operational hours.
More information on the rules and guidelines for safe cycling is available on the LTA website.

 

[LITTLEREDDOT]

 

[LITTLEREDDOT]

 

[LITTLEREDDOT]

Over 25 cyclists caught by LTA, Traffic Police for riding in groups larger than permitted​

The cyclists were caught along Clementi Road and West Coast Highway in the latest round of operations by LTA and the Traffic Police. PHOTOS: LTA
Esther Loi, Whitney William and Therese Soh

MAY 27, 2024

SINGAPORE – More than 25 cyclists were caught on the morning of May 25 for riding in groups that were larger than permitted.
The Land Transport Authority (LTA) said on Facebook later in the day that the cyclists were caught along Clementi Road and West Coast Highway in its latest round of operations with the Traffic Police (TP) against errant cyclists.
Current restrictions, which took effect in January 2022, limit cyclists riding in groups to five if cycling in a single file, or 10 cyclists riding two abreast.
The authorities also advise maintaining a minimum distance of 30m – the equivalent of two lamp posts – between cyclist groups.
In a similar joint enforcement operation by LTA and the TP from the end of April to early May 2024, 16 cyclists were caught for riding in a group larger than 10. Six others were found with non-compliant manual bicycles without a functioning handbrake.
These operations took place in Dunearn Road and Pasir Panjang Road as well as the Woodlands Waterfront area.
Cyclists who flout the rule on group size can be fined $150.

Challenges faced by group cyclists​

Seasoned group cyclists told The Straits Times that they try their best to follow the rules, although they do not fully understand the rationale behind group cycling restrictions.
On Jan 1, 2022, the Ministry of Transport (MOT) rolled out recommendations by the Active Mobility Advisory Panel (Amap) to place a cap on cyclist groups, as it will ensure that the space they occupy is similar to that of a bus.
For the group size limit, Amap had said bigger cyclist group sizes increased the difficulty in maintaining orderly and predictable conduct among members, which could increase the risks for riders themselves. It added that the gap between cyclist groups would leave enough space for overtaking vehicles.


A member of the Singapore West Cyclist community, Mr Khaw Cheng Chuan, 44, who is head of platform at an information technology firm, said there can be situations where other cycling groups may ride close to his due to the road or traffic conditions, without maintaining a minimum distance of 30m.
But the entire pack of cyclists, including his own group that tried to abide by the rules, may be penalised if enforcement officers catch them at that moment.
Mr Vareck Ng, 22, a member of cycling groups Slow Biking Singapore and Safety for Active Mobility Users, said it is challenging to constantly ensure a 30m gap between different cycling groups, especially while in motion on a bicycle.
The soon-to-be university student noted that this draws cyclists’ attention away from focusing on the road and oncoming traffic.
Stepping up education efforts among all road users, policing errant behaviour among drivers and building cycling-centric infrastructure were among the suggestions group cyclists had to improve road safety for their community.
As some motorists and road users still view cyclists as an annoyance, Mr Marco Mejia, 41, president of Singapore-based cycling community Anza (Australian and New Zealand Association) Cycling, said building their empathy for cyclists will be crucial.
“It is a very small window of inconvenience when you wait for five seconds behind a group of cyclists... It’s more about creating the harmonious sharing of the roads,” he added.

Mr Lawrence Choo, 45, founding member of cycling enthusiast groups 10101010 and Faber X, suggested that the guideline for motorists to adhere to a minimum distance of 1.5m when passing cyclists on roads be passed into law, so that it can be enforced like the group cycling rules.
He added that drivers should learn that cyclists also have a right to be on the roads.
Mr Kiki Matthias Cheng, founder of cycling enthusiast group Riding Kakis (Singapore), said it may be more effective to influence cyclists to become role models who “walk the ground” and advocate safer cycling practices within their cycling groups.
The 52-year-old operations director added that this could help “activate” the cycling community in spreading good cycling practices, compared with a top-down approach through law enforcement.
Mr Khaw and Mr Ng both suggested building more dedicated cycling infrastructure, such as cycling lanes that allow road users to give cyclists the right of way.
There are now 525km of cycling paths in Singapore and the cycling path network will be expanded to around 1,300km by 2030.
An LTA spokeswoman said some cyclists had expressed the view that riding abreast and in groups increased their visibility and safety. Conversely, motorists had raised concerns about very large groups of cyclists posing safety risks, especially if they occupy multiple lanes and obstruct traffic.
To strike a balance between these concerns, LTA introduced the limit on cycling group sizes, she said.
LTA also developed a road safety handbook in consultation with the TP, various road users and the industry to guide motorists and cyclists on ways to safely navigate common scenarios on the roads.

Current restrictions limit cyclists riding in groups to five if cycling in a single file, or 10 cyclists riding two abreast. ST PHOTO: MARK CHEONG
Mr Steven Lim, 57, vice-president for safety and education at the Singapore Cycling Federation, said cyclists should observe the rule on maintaining a 30m gap between groups and avoid riding close to cycling groups ahead of them.
If a group tries to follow the rules but gets caught by an enforcement officer due to cyclists behind them riding too close, the group can explain that it is not at fault.
Mr Lim is a member of Amap and was involved in the panel’s fifth review to enhance road safety, where it put forth the recommendations that MOT rolled out.

‘Inconvenient’ to drive behind group cyclists​

Drivers told ST it can be inconvenient to drive behind some cyclists travelling in groups.
Management team member Sanjeev Namath, 56, found that some cyclists often ride in the middle of the road, hogging the lane. He felt that some groups with no “discipline” in following the rules were harder to coexist with on the roads.
Student Rhea Kenneth, 22, found it “inconvenient” to drive behind cyclists she is unable to overtake, which results in her reducing her speed to match theirs. This holds up traffic behind her.
Motorcyclist Galvin Lim, 29, found it quite easy to navigate around cyclists on the roads. But it becomes more dangerous when he comes across groups that ride in a less coordinated manner.
“They swerve from left to right, and usually in areas where cars and bikes tend to speed up. It’s more dangerous as it causes cars to swerve out to overtake,” said the sales manager.
Motorcyclist Satria Mad, 43, has mostly encountered cyclists who abide by the rules. The assistant operations manager said sharing the road with cyclists has been easy because many cyclists are aware of the rules.

 

[LITTLEREDDOT]

Forum: $150 fine for errant cyclists too low​

MAY 28, 2024

I refer to the article “Over 25 cyclists caught by LTA, Traffic Police for riding in groups larger than permitted” (May 25) that detailed the joint operations conducted against errant cyclists.
It was reported that cyclists who flout the rule on group size can be fined $150. This seems like a strikingly low fine for these road offenders, and there is no mention of heavier fines for repeat offenders.
Cyclists who flout traffic rules by cycling in big groups endanger themselves as other motorists cannot anticipate which cyclists would cycle out of line or change lanes abruptly, or present themselves as hindrances by hogging the lane. Large vehicles are also forced to squeeze into other available lanes which may endanger the lives of drivers of smaller vehicles.
The authorities should consider raising the fine to a minimum of $1,000. I’ve noticed that many of these cyclists are not blue-collar workers – they ride bicycles costing a few thousand dollars. A $150 fine seems meagre compared with the money spent on their hobby. A severe monetary penalty would effectively drive a serious note of road safety into the cycling community.

Chia Eu Foong