• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

S-Chip Firms Rapidly Collapsing Amidst Debt And Fraud

SNAblog

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.businessinsider.com/anot...firms-collapsing-amidst-debt-and-fraud-2010-1

Another Warning Sign: China-Based, Singapore-Listed Firms Rapidly Collapsing Amidst Debt And Fraud
Joe Weisenthal | Jan. 24, 2010, 7:47 PM

Here's a fascinating, just-out article in Hong Kong's South China Morning Post (sub req'd) about the collapse of Singapore-listed, mainland China-based firms that have collapsed amidst an inability to repay debt and fraud.

Since late 2007, a spate of so-called S-chips - mainland companies listed on the Singapore exchange - have borrowed money then failed to repay the debts, with some becoming mired in fraud scandals.

Of the 11 S-chips that issued convertible bonds between 2005 and 2008, six have declared themselves unable to repay. Two of those six - steel group Delong Holdings and property developer Sunshine Holdings - have successfully restructured their finances while the rest remain locked in talks with creditors.

Convertible bonds are debt instruments that investors can convert into shares at a later date.

Another five S-chips failed to repay bank loans during 2008-9. The effects on their share prices have been, predictably, crushing.

Not surprisingly, global investment banks have been involved in pushing the S-chips' debt onto investors

In June 2008, blue-chip investment bank Morgan Stanley sold US$109 million worth of convertible bonds issued by waste recovery group Sino Environment Technologies, based in Fujian , to a group of lenders including US investment firm Stark Investments.

Sino-Environment's share price has since crashed from S$1.30 (HK$7.18) on the day it sold the convertible bonds to S$0.135 when the stock was suspended from trading in September.

During that period, Sino not only defaulted on its bonds - the Singapore-listed firm is also being investigated by the city state's Monetary Authority, a person involved in the case confirmed, after its auditors Pricewaterhouse Coopers said they could not verify the whereabouts of US$85 million of Sino-Environment's cash.

The most interesting is probably this one, which is involved in an industry where you don't typically get a lot of publicly-traded action:

The most recent S-chip bond default came from China Milk Products Group, based in Heilongjiang, that produces bull semen and cow embryos for cattle breeders,

The vast majority of the investors who bought US$150 million worth of convertible bonds China Milk sold through Deutsche Bank in December 2006 have exercised an option to get their money back, a person close to the agricultural company confirmed.

China Milk's net profit tumbled 73 per cent in the three months to last June compared to a year previously. The business was hit by last year's tainted milk scandal on the mainland, which cut demand among dairy farmers for new livestock.
 

ahleebabasingaporethief

Alfrescian
Loyal
It is a general perception that those that cannot list in Shanghai and HK come here to get listed bcos we are always PROSTITUTing in every which way AND lose.

So invest in these companies at your own risks.

Ask yourselves this question. Why not Shanghai and HK. Why come here?
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
When I see all the trouble SGX has been having I don't regret pulling ALL my money out of the local market.

I'm an investor & not a punter :smile:
 

longbow

Alfrescian
Loyal
You are RIGHT! That is what I hear too. SGX very desperate to get listing so lowered standards. Another problem are the hedge funds. We have very very low standards for companies to set up hedge funds. Waiting for the next shoe to fall for hedge funds in Singapore.




It is a general perception that those that cannot list in Shanghai and HK come here to get listed bcos we are always PROSTITUTing in every which way AND lose.

So invest in these companies at your own risks.

Ask yourselves this question. Why not Shanghai and HK. Why come here?
 

borom

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
" If native Singaporeans are falling behind because 'the spurs are not stuck into the hide,' that is their problem."
Is this how people with spurs stuck into their hide are supposed to operate ?
How about the melamine in milk products-even after 6 kids died and 300,000
got sick, they are doing it again.
I wonder what will happen to our so called "Singapore Brand" we have carefully built over the years-are we going to let the hard work of 2 generations go down the drain to attract such FT's?
 

borom

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
....Just finished serving time for a silly case of corporate malfeasance? Looking for a new job? Why not try that model equal-opportunity employer, China’s state-owned sector?.....has re-embraced Chen Jiulin, who was chief executive of China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. when in 2004 it incurred losses of $550 million trading oil derivatives.....Chen was sentenced by a Singaporean court to 51 months in prison for issuing false financial statements and failing to inform Singapore’s stock exchange of CAO Singapore’s losses among other charges........, the judge who presided over the case called it the “biggest corporate scandal” to hit Singapore since rogue trader Nick Leeson caused the demise of Barings of Britain .......Now, in a remarkable turnaround in fortune, Chen is one of eight deputy managers at China Gezhouba Group Corp. International Ltd, or CGGC International, a state-owned engineering and construction firm.....

http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2010/06/24/china’s-state-sector-takes-care-of-its-own/

Another revelation as to why S_chips management behaving the way they are? Just more of the same, from Suzhou to Tianjing .

When the 86 year old visited China, I wonder if they laugh at him and than thank him for donating those monies.
 

longbow

Alfrescian
Loyal
It is a general perception that those that cannot list in Shanghai and HK come here to get listed

Ask yourselves this question. Why not Shanghai and HK. Why come here?

Have a friend in HK that says exactly the same thing. They keep the best for Shanghai and HK and Singapore gets the scraps. But our bourse too small after the clob issue so they are willing to lower standards for sake of turnover. As it is, Chinese companies are very popular and make up majority to global IPOs recently. In short Chinese companies that are blue chip can easily raise $$ in HK and Shanghai. In move to strengthen their banks reserve ratios, Chinese banks are raising billions. Qatar and Kuwait recently bought close to US$3B in Ag Bank of China. ABC plans to raise up to US$30 billion in HK and SHANGHAI???

Same too for hedge funds. Our standards are very liberal.
 

batman1

Alfrescian
Loyal
It is a general perception that those that cannot list in Shanghai and HK come here to get listed bcos we are always PROSTITUTing in every which way AND lose.

So invest in these companies at your own risks.

Ask yourselves this question. Why not Shanghai and HK. Why come here?

To the MIW ,anything yes anything that is Foreign must be damned farking good without regard to the damages that the fraudulent Foreign companies will inflict onto the local investors eventually.KNNCCB MIW burnt in hell !
 

unicando

Alfrescian
Loyal
hmm...chn blue chips listing in hkg is natural for them wat (economically and culturally at every levels). if we can overcome these maybe we can attract them here also...
 

borom

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
http://www.businesstimes.com.sg/sub/news/story/0,4574,402459,00.html?
Business Times - 03 Sep 2010

New Lakeside auditors flag possible misrepresentations
Matter brought to attention of audit committee and Minister of Finance
By JAMIE LEE
(SINGAPORE) Auditors of New Lakeside Holdings said fraudulent misrepresentations may have been given to them during the audit of the fiscal 2009 financial results.
The chairman of the audit committee has been informed of this by Singapore-based auditors LTC, New Lakeside said in a regulatory filing yesterday. And these possible 'fraudulent misrepresentations' were said to have led to errors in the financial statement for FY2009 and 'accordingly, the audit opinion previously rendered by LTC for FY2009 can no longer be relied upon'.
LTC had also reported this possible breach of the Companies Act to the Minister of Finance on Monday, the China-based apple juice maker said.
At the centre of it all is a corporate guarantee (details of which were not given by New Lakeside) that was recognised as a liability for the fiscal half-year ended Dec 31, 2009. 'Based on preliminary assessment, LTC is of the opinion that the liability should have been recognised as a liability since financial year 2006 and could impact the financial statements for subsequent years,' New Lakeside said.
A look at the group's half-year statement shows two corporate guarantees for two loans totalling 24.5 million yuan (S$4.8 million) - made up of a 14.5 million yuan loan and a 10 million yuan loan - that were backed by corporate guarantees from the subsidiary New Lakeside Fruit Juice (Yuncheng) and New Lakeside Holdings. These are the loans that the banks are seeking immediate repayment of. It is not clear if the corporate guarantee mentioned by New Lakeside refers to these loans.
Both these corporate guarantees were not presented in its full-year statement for the 12 months ended June 30, 2009.
The company said in January this year that Bank of China (BOC) had staked a claim of 22.8 million yuan from the group's unit, New Lakeside Fruit Juice (Xuzhou), or NLX, which was acting as a guarantor for banking facilities to a former subsidiary. As a result, New Lakeside said it would make a full provision for the claim in the same announcement.
A 22.8 million yuan provision booked by NLX was recognised in the parent's results for the half-year ended Dec 31, 2009, which was released on Feb 12, 2010.
The BOC claim led two other principal bankers - China Construction Bank and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China - to demand immediate repayment of the loans of 14.5 million yuan and 10 million yuan.
LTC had earlier raised an emphasis of matter over the group's net current liabilities as at June 30, 2009, of 93.2 million yuan and negative operating cash flows of 12.7 million yuan. It also flagged concerns over New Lakeside's net loss of 84.9 million yuan for fiscal 2009.
LTC, which is now conducting the audit for fiscal 2010, said it would restate the company's fiscal 2009 financial statement.
Trading of shares of New Lakeside - which has been making losses since July 2008 - has been suspended until further details are released. The stock last traded at two cents.
Copyright © 2010 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. All rights reserved.

Wonder how many locals have lost monies due to the continued fraud by these Chinese firms.Yet the people responsible for inviting these types over continued to enjoy their million dollar salaries.

I do not sympathise with those who lose money by buying PRC's.

But I wonder how much of these ill gotten gains from fraud ect2 were used to buy local properties and make housing unaffordable to the ordinary Singaporeans.

Why should our best properties be owned by crooks from PRC, Indonesia, Myanmar ect2 while our children have to serve NS to defend them?
 

borom

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Business Times - 03 Dec 2010

AN AUDIT review on New Lakeside has uncovered 'serious deficiencies and lapses' in the group's internal controls and corporate governance by its management.

The Chinese apple juice maker failed to comply with SGX listing rules and its improper accounting treatments have led to material misstatements in the financial statements for the past three years, special auditors Stone Forest Corporate Advisory (SFCA) said in a report released yesterday.

SFCA was appointed to review the internal controls of the group and probe certain transactions of the group and its subsidiaries.

These included a corporate guarantee of 30.5 million yuan (S$6 million) by a group subsidiary New Lakeside Fruit Juice (Xuzhou) Co (NLX) to Bank of China (BOC) for banking facilities to a former group subsidiary.

When that former subsidiary Sanmenxia Lakeside Fruit Juice Co (SMXL) defaulted on the loan, BOC issued notices to both SMXL and NLX demanding repayment, and subsequently took legal actions against them on Dec 4, 2006.

But no immediate disclosure was made by New Lakeside
and the liabilities of NLX were not reported in the group's fiscal 2006 financial report. New Lakeside only disclosed through SGXNet on Jan 26 this year that BOC has called for the corporate guarantee.

The special auditor also found out through computer forensics that two draft versions of a profit warning announcement circulated among directors contained a full provision of 22.75 million yuan for the corporate guarantee. But the actual profit warning announcement on July 22 last year failed to make reference to the corporate guarantee or legal actions by BOC.

'Based solely on the above, there appears to have been an attempt to cover up the fact that the liabilities of 22.75 million yuan to BOC had crystallised,' SFCA said.

Improper accounting treatment of NLX's corporate guarantee and other dubious accounting entries have led to material misstatements in the group's financial statements for fiscal 2006, 2008 and 2009, SFCA said. The group did not report fiscal 2007 results as it had changed its financial year-end from December to June in that year.

During its course of work, SFCA noted that there was no evidence of review for most accounting entries, certain BOC statements were missing and expenses were not fully accounted for at year-end that resulted in misstatement of profit and loss for FY2008 and FY2009.

New Lakeside also failed to seek shareholders approval for an interested party transaction (IPT), SFCA said, pointing to some 10.5 million yuan owed by a third party to the group as mentioned in the group's FY2008 annual report.

Since there were no business dealings between New Lakeside and this company, SFCA said that it has 'reasons to believe that the amount owing by (the third party) was granted as a loan'. This sum made up about 17.1 per cent of the group's audited net tangible assets at that time and the third party was apparently owned by New Lakeside managing director Go Twan Heng and/or his wife.

In addition, there were also no letters of authorisation to show that transfers of money totalling 14.21 million yuan from companies in China to the group are indeed loans from Mr Go as claimed, SFCA said.

Alarm bells already started ringing earlier this year in New Lakeside. Its chief financial officer tendered his resignation in April, after a deadlock among its executive directors over how to resolve cashflow problems in the group.

Later in September, external auditors LTC LLP said that there were possible misrepresentations in the audit of fiscal 2009 financial results stemming from the corporate guarantee and reported this possible breach of the Companies Act to the Minister of Finance.

Unable to repay its debts, New Lakeside filed for judicial management (JM) and came under the JM order last month.

http://www.businesstimes.com.sg/sub/storyprintfriendly/0,4582,415892,00.html?

Have yet to hear of any actions against the management by SGX,MAS or CPIB.
All these PRC crooks geting away scot free?
 

borom

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Congress and SEC Hit Stocks Made in China
............... One of China's least-noticed exports to the U.S. has been hundreds of Chinese companies that slipped onto U.S. stock exchanges through back-door mergers with dormant shell companies........Many of these ...have minimal revenues, questionable accounting and inscrutable corporate governance.....'

The SEC has also begun homing in on individual Chinese companies for accounting violations and lax auditing practices, ......

.... the House financial-services committee ....fear is that some companies are rife with self-dealing and potential fraud, and weak international standards have let it go largely undetected........

Copyright 2010 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100...19244966.html?mod=WSJASIA_hpp_LEFTTopWhatNews
.
While this is nothing new to people who had dealt with the PRC's, the "naive" ang mo will soon learn things the hard way and I bet they will not be so kind as our SGX or MAS.
For those who still believe in S ships and other China plays, good luck.
 

borom

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The Straits Times
Published on Jan 7, 2011
Date set for Celestial's winding-up petition hearing

By Jonathan Kwok
THE High Court has set a date to hear a winding-up petition against beleaguered Celestial Nutrifoods, but long-suffering shareholders are unlikely to get anything from this move.The initial hearing of the winding-up petition - submitted by bondholders owed about $235 million by Celestial - will be held on Jan 21, said a statement on the Singapore Exchange (SGX) website on Friday.

But that will be scant consolation for shareholders of the China-based soya bean company, who are likely to get nothing back. If a firm becomes insolvent, all its creditors, such as bondholders, must be paid in full before shareholders get a share of the proceeds from selling its assets.

By the time the creditors are paid, if at all, there is unlikely to be much left over for shareholders.

BNY Corporate Trustee Services, as the trustee for the bondholders, is trying to get the money back from Celestial. The company - which has had its stock suspended and has been told by the SGX to delist - has been under a provisional liquidator's control since late last month.

http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_621694.html

Makes one wonder about the wisdom of Temasek's increasing exposure to PRC
including the recent announcements by Capitaland/Malls and GLP.
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Makes one wonder about the wisdom of Temasek's increasing exposure to PRC
including the recent announcements by Capitaland/Malls and GLP.

What's there to wonder about, the same people responsible for the billions of losses are still there. They'll continue making "honest mistakes" until they get thrown out by a "fluke" election:rolleyes:
 

Loofydralb

Alfrescian
Loyal
Get out of SGX especially S-Chips.

Most of them are con-jobs. The administrators know the pits they are in but unsure of the course of action to take lest they start a run on their platform.

Investors will get hurt eventually if SGX does not throw the book at these sleazy counters. Their reticence embolden the other S-Chips. They now view SGX as toothless.
 

cooleo

Alfrescian
Loyal
I always wonder why investors like to invest in those dodgy companies listed in Shit(GX).

If got money, play with the big boys at NYSE la. But doubt many can buy in lots. For instance, Google priced at $616.44 now.
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I always wonder why investors like to invest in those dodgy companies listed in Shit(GX).

If got money, play with the big boys at NYSE la. But doubt many can buy in lots. For instance, Google priced at $616.44 now.


There's so many companies being traded in NYSE & NSADAQ. Many are paying dividens too. Can always buy AAPL at US$335, good chance of going up to $400.

Many more reputable companies in the US compared to the dodgy one's being traded in SGX
 

silverfox@

Alfrescian
Loyal
The focus is on China shares.

Even in NYSE n NASDAQ, there are many china companies which just IPO and price immediately goes up few folds. Reputable or not, overrated? That is for individuals to judge for themselves.
 
Top