-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Return My CPF Thread: Han HuiHui & Roy Ngerng vs the CPF/NParks
- Thread starter xingguy
- Start date
Re: Mr Brown says HHH & Roy are insensitive wankers
Well, well, well....by George!...we have a PM who is gay as he can be....each time, you see his picture, he is smiling & GAY! (psst! mind the pink shirt)...
Well, well, well....by George!...we have a PM who is gay as he can be....each time, you see his picture, he is smiling & GAY! (psst! mind the pink shirt)...
Re: Mr Brown says HHH & Roy are insensitive wankers
i have a hunch and strong feeling that these cronies are trying to score point using this incident. i think this incident was coincidence, and the opportunistic cronies like mr brown and his likes, are using this to score point. dun forget he drank tea with robert lee before. and take note no physical hurt was done just maybe scary outing for the kids and elderly. i do not condone what roy and his gang did but the mp teo dun have to use this to crunch him by asking him to apologise. maybe i too judgmental on them...just maybe...:o
p.s. sorry mr brown, i know your daughter faith is autistic but i think you are over-reacting and dun have to mention again that your daughter is like that, i still like to read what you write on your blog, please dun be offended in anyway...cheers...
i have a hunch and strong feeling that these cronies are trying to score point using this incident. i think this incident was coincidence, and the opportunistic cronies like mr brown and his likes, are using this to score point. dun forget he drank tea with robert lee before. and take note no physical hurt was done just maybe scary outing for the kids and elderly. i do not condone what roy and his gang did but the mp teo dun have to use this to crunch him by asking him to apologise. maybe i too judgmental on them...just maybe...:o
p.s. sorry mr brown, i know your daughter faith is autistic but i think you are over-reacting and dun have to mention again that your daughter is like that, i still like to read what you write on your blog, please dun be offended in anyway...cheers...
Last edited:
Re: Mr Brown says HHH & Roy are insensitive wankers
[video=youtube;h67k9eEw9AY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h67k9eEw9AY[/video]
[video=youtube;h67k9eEw9AY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h67k9eEw9AY[/video]
Re: Mr Brown says HHH & Roy are insensitive wankers
Yes people you beat me to it. Probably after another istana session brown was ordered to give the brown
Yes people you beat me to it. Probably after another istana session brown was ordered to give the brown
Re: what really happened at hong lim park on saturday
This hong lim incident propelled triple hhh to the limelight, letting her enter into the view of the whole nation.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/9_yXPsrp7hI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
This hong lim incident propelled triple hhh to the limelight, letting her enter into the view of the whole nation.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/9_yXPsrp7hI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Re: Clash Of CPF Protesters With MIWs / Crassloots This Sat 27 Sep 2014
Oooh sure whatever you say.
Tsk tsk... the personal attacks and shaming language have finally arrived. I must have touched a raw nerve eh?
Please scour through my thousands of posts and find a single post which shows that I am a staunch supporter of the WP, to the exclusion of all other opposition parties.
You're just like one of those Android fanboys whose knee-jerk instinct towards those who prefer an iPhone is to immediately call them iSheep.
Only PAP IBs insist on calling opposition supporters IBs... this is sheer psychological projection. LOL.
P.S: I excercise often and I'm in great shape. You need to try harder with your shaming language. Better luck next work week (or this weekend, if some of your assistants is on duty).
Oooh sure whatever you say.
Re: what really happened at hong lim park on saturday
Does it matter? Within hours after Saturday's sunset, the SPH presstitutes have already gone out in full force to set their narrative.
I'm not so sure that I can trust daft Sinkies with discernment and critical thinking, instead of taking govt-controlled news reports at face value.
Does it matter? Within hours after Saturday's sunset, the SPH presstitutes have already gone out in full force to set their narrative.
I'm not so sure that I can trust daft Sinkies with discernment and critical thinking, instead of taking govt-controlled news reports at face value.
Re: Mr Brown says HHH & Roy are insensitive wankers
Roy and Han Hui Hui are just smearing the reputation of opposition. Good luck.
Roy and Han Hui Hui are just smearing the reputation of opposition. Good luck.
Sibeh funny, malay cheebye this time super quick!
Wah, this must be some score points topic, so many jiakliaobees joined
http://www.tremeritus.com/2014/09/28/even-mp-intan-surfaces-to-condemn-marching-incident/
After a long period of silence on her Facebook page [Link], Ang Mo Kio GRC MP Intan has suddenly become active again in the last 2-3 days.
She has joined her fellow MPs (‘Suddenly MPs surface to condemn marching incident‘) to criticize the organisers of the #ReturnOurCPF event which was held at Hong Lim Park yesterday (27 Sep).
She posted the following on her Facebook page today (28 Sep) at 2:42pm, saying that the organisers’ actions were unjustifiable, done by those “who claimed to be carrying out a ‘peaceful protest’”:
It is not known if she wrote this message herself or if it was her Facebook page administrator who wrote it for her.
On Thursday (25 Sep) when she broke her silence in admitting to writing an appeal letter in support of PRC tour guide Yang Yin’s PR application, she told the media that she was not sure about any of the posting deletions from her Facebook page and said that the administrators of the page might have done so. That being the case, some of her posts may or may not have been written by her personally, since she has staff helping to “administer” her Facebook page.
It took almost 3 weeks of relentless pressure from the public to “force” MP Intan to admit. On Thursday, she said that she had written the appeal letter only at the “behest of Mdm Chung Khin Chun”.
In an earlier interview with the media, Dr Intan, who is the adviser to all the grassroots committees in her ward including Mr Yang’s, maintained that she did not know him personally. She recalls meeting him only once at a cooking activity:
PRC Yang Yin helping out at a grassroots function, beside MP Intan
She did, however, remember Mdm Chung approaching her, asking her to support Mr Yang’s PR application. “She first came to see me and sought my help in May 2011… for her grandson,” said Dr Intan. “This is what she told me and I referred Mdm Chung’s request to the authorities.”
She claimed that she responded only because Mdm Chung was “a resident of my constituency and a Singaporean”.
“If Mr Yang had come to me, I wouldn’t be able to help him because he’s not a Singaporean,” she said. “What I would have told him is that you probably can apply for PR to the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority directly.”
Sudden Facebook activities last 2-3 days
Dr Intan’s ordeal started on 7 September 2014, when she posted a picture of a groundbreaking ceremony at her ward. Netizens, instead of talking about the groundbreaking ceremony shown in the picture, began to ask her if she had supported Mr Yang’s PR application.
2 weeks later (22 Sep), she posted a message about some PCF grassroots event.
Thoroughly enjoyed watching our pre-schoolers dramatize or recite their favourite stories, such as Goldilocks and the Three Bears, and The Little Hen… Do show your support and bring your pre-loved children’s books to any PCF centre. Thank you!
But she continued to dodge netizens’ questions on Mr Yang’s PR application. Then on 25 September, she capitulated and broke her silence, telling the media that she had indeed supported Mr Yang’s PR application and why she had done so. She even posted her media interview the next day (26 Sep):
Yesterday (27 Sep), she posted another message about having a new Neighborhood Centre for a new BTO project in her ward:
Today (28 Sep) at about noontime, she talked about the PCF Family Day at Universal Studios this morning:
And of course, at 2:42pm, she posted the above Facebook message joining in with the rest of the MPs to condemn the organizers of the #ReturnOurCPF event.
Wah, this must be some score points topic, so many jiakliaobees joined
http://www.tremeritus.com/2014/09/28/even-mp-intan-surfaces-to-condemn-marching-incident/
After a long period of silence on her Facebook page [Link], Ang Mo Kio GRC MP Intan has suddenly become active again in the last 2-3 days.
She has joined her fellow MPs (‘Suddenly MPs surface to condemn marching incident‘) to criticize the organisers of the #ReturnOurCPF event which was held at Hong Lim Park yesterday (27 Sep).
She posted the following on her Facebook page today (28 Sep) at 2:42pm, saying that the organisers’ actions were unjustifiable, done by those “who claimed to be carrying out a ‘peaceful protest’”:
It is not known if she wrote this message herself or if it was her Facebook page administrator who wrote it for her.
On Thursday (25 Sep) when she broke her silence in admitting to writing an appeal letter in support of PRC tour guide Yang Yin’s PR application, she told the media that she was not sure about any of the posting deletions from her Facebook page and said that the administrators of the page might have done so. That being the case, some of her posts may or may not have been written by her personally, since she has staff helping to “administer” her Facebook page.
It took almost 3 weeks of relentless pressure from the public to “force” MP Intan to admit. On Thursday, she said that she had written the appeal letter only at the “behest of Mdm Chung Khin Chun”.
In an earlier interview with the media, Dr Intan, who is the adviser to all the grassroots committees in her ward including Mr Yang’s, maintained that she did not know him personally. She recalls meeting him only once at a cooking activity:
PRC Yang Yin helping out at a grassroots function, beside MP Intan
She did, however, remember Mdm Chung approaching her, asking her to support Mr Yang’s PR application. “She first came to see me and sought my help in May 2011… for her grandson,” said Dr Intan. “This is what she told me and I referred Mdm Chung’s request to the authorities.”
She claimed that she responded only because Mdm Chung was “a resident of my constituency and a Singaporean”.
“If Mr Yang had come to me, I wouldn’t be able to help him because he’s not a Singaporean,” she said. “What I would have told him is that you probably can apply for PR to the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority directly.”
Sudden Facebook activities last 2-3 days
Dr Intan’s ordeal started on 7 September 2014, when she posted a picture of a groundbreaking ceremony at her ward. Netizens, instead of talking about the groundbreaking ceremony shown in the picture, began to ask her if she had supported Mr Yang’s PR application.
2 weeks later (22 Sep), she posted a message about some PCF grassroots event.
Thoroughly enjoyed watching our pre-schoolers dramatize or recite their favourite stories, such as Goldilocks and the Three Bears, and The Little Hen… Do show your support and bring your pre-loved children’s books to any PCF centre. Thank you!
But she continued to dodge netizens’ questions on Mr Yang’s PR application. Then on 25 September, she capitulated and broke her silence, telling the media that she had indeed supported Mr Yang’s PR application and why she had done so. She even posted her media interview the next day (26 Sep):
Yesterday (27 Sep), she posted another message about having a new Neighborhood Centre for a new BTO project in her ward:
Today (28 Sep) at about noontime, she talked about the PCF Family Day at Universal Studios this morning:
And of course, at 2:42pm, she posted the above Facebook message joining in with the rest of the MPs to condemn the organizers of the #ReturnOurCPF event.
Re: Mr Brown says HHH & Roy are insensitive wankers
Those nutcases and those that support them r just doing the opposition in. They r insensitive to the special needs kids but then they claim to support the poor and downtrodden?? How to believe??
Those nutcases and those that support them r just doing the opposition in. They r insensitive to the special needs kids but then they claim to support the poor and downtrodden?? How to believe??
Re: This coming election, the Dragon will be slayed!! LOL!
To those uncles and aunties in the protest march, and also those who had voted for papees in GE2011, this translated article surely will cost papees to lose more seats in GE2016 especially if the loss is also the AMK GRC.
To those uncles and aunties in the protest march, and also those who had voted for papees in GE2011, this translated article surely will cost papees to lose more seats in GE2016 especially if the loss is also the AMK GRC.
Re: Mr Brown says HHH & Roy are insensitive wankers
Maybe you will understand next time when your retard child is being disturbed during his performance.
Maybe you will understand next time when your retard child is being disturbed during his performance.
Re: what really happened at hong lim park on saturday
Pappy Tan The Temasek Review
The only PAP 'B' Team Singaporeans witness past 20 years is SDP and Dr Chee.
Dr Chee broke up a perfectly growing SDP under Chiam See Tong and lost all 3 seats at GE1997 that was won at GE1991 under Chiam See Tong's SDP.
This is because Chee's SDP decide to focus on making as much inaccurate noise in Parliament, being aggressive in Parliament, exposing SDP to lawsuits , conducting civil disobedience and getting arrested rather than running town councils and bonding with residents via grassroots.
The loss caused Singaporeans to lose faith in Opposition for 20 years untl GE2011 when WP made a difficult breakthrough. PAP kept harping Opposition cannot run a SMC let alone a GRC because of SDP's loss at GE1997. SDP almost destroyed Opposition Cause with their antics.
Civil disobedience, bankruptcy, arrests, lawsuits etc gave Opposition a bad image and reminded Singaporeans to fear PAP even more. SDP actually made PAP more feared and more powerful instead and Singaporeans felt more hopeless.
Many good people wanted to join Opposition but seeing Dr Chee's situation decided not to. This lack of good people joining Opposition gave many Walkovers to PAP for 20 years in every elections. SDP only gave Walkovers to Singaporeans at elections because CSJ and gang kept getting barred from elections because of their antics.
What choice, what democracy, what rights, what hope, what change, what impact and what freedom did SDP gave Singaporeans past 20 years ? Nothing at all.
Democracy is not just freedom to have civil disobedience but democracy is also about giving people choice to change governments in elections, not change Opposition parties.
Now PAP once again wants to unleash the Kraken in CSJ to confuse and disrupt alternative parties progress from GE2011 by agreeing to give discount from $500,000 to $30,000 so that CSJ can take part in elections. Destructive, disruptive and history repeats itself.
SPP at least kept one seat in Parliament for 15 years after GE1997 and never got voted out and lose seats before GE2011. SPP was already small and weak when Chiam started it. 15 years down the road under different political landscape, SPP did contest one GRC at least. One less than SDP only who under Chee did not grow much too despite having longer time of brand name.
It took Chiam and SDP 15 years to win 3 seats at GE1991. So how can you say SDP would not have grown under Chiam when SDP did grew under Chiam at GE1991.
Not even WP lost seats before. JBJ was disqualified from Parliament after being charged and Yaw Shin Leong was sacked by WP. None was voted out.
SDP under Dr Chee after GE1997 past 15 years got voted out of Bukit Gombak and Nee Soon Central, never grow but got smaller and did not even win any seats. You call this good record ?
It is not grandmother's story but true facts. No Singaporean Opposition Supporter want to sacrifice another 20 years and see no result from any Alternative Parties.
Technically and officially, somebody here said there is only one Opposition in Parliament which is WP because the rest are either NCMPs or alternative parties with no seats. Even to be Opposition, political parties need to win enough seats to be Opposition.
I still believe in growing only WP to be Government as fast as possible base on Hougang and Aljunied platforms. This is irregardless what other alternative parties try to pull off, antics and plans. Every party have its own style, voters will decide.
No point running down each alternative parties now. You can run down WP all you want ONLY after WP is government and be blamed for WP government policies.
No more Alternative Parties Musical Chairs we seen last 47 years.
I hardly see you commenting on negative PAP threads but comment on every negative WP thread and pretending to be SDP supporter and NSP supporter. I can only conclude you are a PAP IB.
All political parties have positives and negatives. Each wants to try their own style so let it be. Voters shall decide. SDP is free to continue to stage protest etc. WP is free to use its own tactical style. PAP is free to continue to run down anybody that gets in its way. NSP is free to continue to state the obvious. RP is free to continue to piggyback on whatever other parties started.
I dont think I am running down anybody here. I am just stating history and SDP's output last 20 years. I did not wish to do it but if people like Robox, TTR and Sam Lim continue to run down WP in all possible and petty ways instead of focusing on PAP which is the main reason for ruining Singaporean's lives, then I wish to join in the fun too.
TTR's record until BE2012 was normal, you seldom see people posting negatives about SDP and WP too and everyone were attacking only PAP. But BE2012 onwards, turn its focus on WP more so the negatives about WP, SDP, RP, NSP etc started appearing too. TTR is the root culprit for everything.
Yes, all political parties have its negatives but we leave it to Singapore Media to dig it out as tradition and Internet is more the opposite direction. All Opposition supporters understood all Alternative Parties have bad points as well but like Singapore Media for PAP, we help each other out by minimising these negatives for Alternative Parties.
Now TTR wants to upset the equilibrium and test all Alternative Parties supporters patience and confuse them. The Anti-WP and pro-SDP stance had upset the Balance and tilt into PAP's favour.
Then more and more people will join in the fun, end result could only be disaster for all alternative parties at GE2016 and glee for PAP as every alternative party supporter rather see each other die and drag each other down than let any alternative party beat them to beating PAP.
I hardly see you commenting on negative PAP threads but comment on every negative WP thread and pretending to be SDP supporter and NSP supporter. I can only conclude you are a PAP IB.
All political parties have positives and negatives. Each wants to try their own style so let it be. Voters shall decide. SDP is free to continue to stage protest etc. WP is free to use its own tactical style. PAP is free to continue to run down anybody that gets in its way. NSP is free to continue to state the obvious. RP is free to continue to piggyback on whatever other parties started.
I dont think I am running down anybody here. I am just stating history and SDP's output last 20 years. I did not wish to do it but if people like Robox, TTR and Sam Lim continue to run down WP in all possible and petty ways instead of focusing on PAP which is the main reason for ruining Singaporean's lives, then I wish to join in the fun too.
TTR's record until BE2012 was normal, you seldom see people posting negatives about SDP and WP too and everyone were attacking only PAP. But BE2012 onwards, turn its focus on WP more so the negatives about WP, SDP, RP, NSP etc started appearing too. TTR is the root culprit for everything.
Yes, all political parties have its negatives but we leave it to Singapore Media to dig it out as tradition and Internet is more the opposite direction. All Opposition supporters understood all Alternative Parties have bad points as well but like Singapore Media for PAP, we help each other out by minimising these negatives for Alternative Parties.
Now TTR wants to upset the equilibrium and test all Alternative Parties supporters patience and confuse them. The Anti-WP and pro-SDP stance had upset the Balance and tilt into PAP's favour.
Then more and more people will join in the fun, end result could only be disaster for all alternative parties at GE2016 and glee for PAP as every alternative party supporter rather see each other die and drag each other down than let any alternative party beat them to beating PAP.
The only PAP 'B' Team Singaporeans witness past 20 years is SDP and Dr Chee.
Dr Chee broke up a perfectly growing SDP under Chiam See Tong and lost all 3 seats at GE1997 that was won at GE1991 under Chiam See Tong's SDP.
Now PAP once again wants to unleash the Kraken in CSJ to confuse and disrupt alternative parties progress from GE2011 by agreeing to give discount from $500,000 to $30,000 so that CSJ can take part in elections. Destructive, disruptive and history repeats itself.
The only PAP 'B' Team Singaporeans witness past 20 years is SDP and Dr Chee.
Dr Chee broke up a perfectly growing SDP under Chiam See Tong and lost all 3 seats at GE1997 that was won at GE1991 under Chiam See Tong's SDP.
Now PAP once again wants to unleash the Kraken in CSJ to confuse and disrupt alternative parties progress from GE2011 by agreeing to give discount from $500,000 to $30,000 so that CSJ can take part in elections. Destructive, disruptive and history repeats itself.
Pappy Tan The Temasek Review
The only PAP 'B' Team Singaporeans witness past 20 years is SDP and Dr Chee.
Dr Chee broke up a perfectly growing SDP under Chiam See Tong and lost all 3 seats at GE1997 that was won at GE1991 under Chiam See Tong's SDP.
This is because Chee's SDP decide to focus on making as much inaccurate noise in Parliament, being aggressive in Parliament, exposing SDP to lawsuits , conducting civil disobedience and getting arrested rather than running town councils and bonding with residents via grassroots.
The loss caused Singaporeans to lose faith in Opposition for 20 years untl GE2011 when WP made a difficult breakthrough. PAP kept harping Opposition cannot run a SMC let alone a GRC because of SDP's loss at GE1997. SDP almost destroyed Opposition Cause with their antics.
Civil disobedience, bankruptcy, arrests, lawsuits etc gave Opposition a bad image and reminded Singaporeans to fear PAP even more. SDP actually made PAP more feared and more powerful instead and Singaporeans felt more hopeless.
Many good people wanted to join Opposition but seeing Dr Chee's situation decided not to. This lack of good people joining Opposition gave many Walkovers to PAP for 20 years in every elections. SDP only gave Walkovers to Singaporeans at elections because CSJ and gang kept getting barred from elections because of their antics.
What choice, what democracy, what rights, what hope, what change, what impact and what freedom did SDP gave Singaporeans past 20 years ? Nothing at all.
Democracy is not just freedom to have civil disobedience but democracy is also about giving people choice to change governments in elections, not change Opposition parties.
Now PAP once again wants to unleash the Kraken in CSJ to confuse and disrupt alternative parties progress from GE2011 by agreeing to give discount from $500,000 to $30,000 so that CSJ can take part in elections. Destructive, disruptive and history repeats itself.
SPP at least kept one seat in Parliament for 15 years after GE1997 and never got voted out and lose seats before GE2011. SPP was already small and weak when Chiam started it. 15 years down the road under different political landscape, SPP did contest one GRC at least. One less than SDP only who under Chee did not grow much too despite having longer time of brand name.
It took Chiam and SDP 15 years to win 3 seats at GE1991. So how can you say SDP would not have grown under Chiam when SDP did grew under Chiam at GE1991.
Not even WP lost seats before. JBJ was disqualified from Parliament after being charged and Yaw Shin Leong was sacked by WP. None was voted out.
SDP under Dr Chee after GE1997 past 15 years got voted out of Bukit Gombak and Nee Soon Central, never grow but got smaller and did not even win any seats. You call this good record ?
It is not grandmother's story but true facts. No Singaporean Opposition Supporter want to sacrifice another 20 years and see no result from any Alternative Parties.
Technically and officially, somebody here said there is only one Opposition in Parliament which is WP because the rest are either NCMPs or alternative parties with no seats. Even to be Opposition, political parties need to win enough seats to be Opposition.
I still believe in growing only WP to be Government as fast as possible base on Hougang and Aljunied platforms. This is irregardless what other alternative parties try to pull off, antics and plans. Every party have its own style, voters will decide.
No point running down each alternative parties now. You can run down WP all you want ONLY after WP is government and be blamed for WP government policies.
No more Alternative Parties Musical Chairs we seen last 47 years.
I hardly see you commenting on negative PAP threads but comment on every negative WP thread and pretending to be SDP supporter and NSP supporter. I can only conclude you are a PAP IB.
All political parties have positives and negatives. Each wants to try their own style so let it be. Voters shall decide. SDP is free to continue to stage protest etc. WP is free to use its own tactical style. PAP is free to continue to run down anybody that gets in its way. NSP is free to continue to state the obvious. RP is free to continue to piggyback on whatever other parties started.
I dont think I am running down anybody here. I am just stating history and SDP's output last 20 years. I did not wish to do it but if people like Robox, TTR and Sam Lim continue to run down WP in all possible and petty ways instead of focusing on PAP which is the main reason for ruining Singaporean's lives, then I wish to join in the fun too.
TTR's record until BE2012 was normal, you seldom see people posting negatives about SDP and WP too and everyone were attacking only PAP. But BE2012 onwards, turn its focus on WP more so the negatives about WP, SDP, RP, NSP etc started appearing too. TTR is the root culprit for everything.
Yes, all political parties have its negatives but we leave it to Singapore Media to dig it out as tradition and Internet is more the opposite direction. All Opposition supporters understood all Alternative Parties have bad points as well but like Singapore Media for PAP, we help each other out by minimising these negatives for Alternative Parties.
Now TTR wants to upset the equilibrium and test all Alternative Parties supporters patience and confuse them. The Anti-WP and pro-SDP stance had upset the Balance and tilt into PAP's favour.
Then more and more people will join in the fun, end result could only be disaster for all alternative parties at GE2016 and glee for PAP as every alternative party supporter rather see each other die and drag each other down than let any alternative party beat them to beating PAP.
I hardly see you commenting on negative PAP threads but comment on every negative WP thread and pretending to be SDP supporter and NSP supporter. I can only conclude you are a PAP IB.
All political parties have positives and negatives. Each wants to try their own style so let it be. Voters shall decide. SDP is free to continue to stage protest etc. WP is free to use its own tactical style. PAP is free to continue to run down anybody that gets in its way. NSP is free to continue to state the obvious. RP is free to continue to piggyback on whatever other parties started.
I dont think I am running down anybody here. I am just stating history and SDP's output last 20 years. I did not wish to do it but if people like Robox, TTR and Sam Lim continue to run down WP in all possible and petty ways instead of focusing on PAP which is the main reason for ruining Singaporean's lives, then I wish to join in the fun too.
TTR's record until BE2012 was normal, you seldom see people posting negatives about SDP and WP too and everyone were attacking only PAP. But BE2012 onwards, turn its focus on WP more so the negatives about WP, SDP, RP, NSP etc started appearing too. TTR is the root culprit for everything.
Yes, all political parties have its negatives but we leave it to Singapore Media to dig it out as tradition and Internet is more the opposite direction. All Opposition supporters understood all Alternative Parties have bad points as well but like Singapore Media for PAP, we help each other out by minimising these negatives for Alternative Parties.
Now TTR wants to upset the equilibrium and test all Alternative Parties supporters patience and confuse them. The Anti-WP and pro-SDP stance had upset the Balance and tilt into PAP's favour.
Then more and more people will join in the fun, end result could only be disaster for all alternative parties at GE2016 and glee for PAP as every alternative party supporter rather see each other die and drag each other down than let any alternative party beat them to beating PAP.
The only PAP 'B' Team Singaporeans witness past 20 years is SDP and Dr Chee.
Dr Chee broke up a perfectly growing SDP under Chiam See Tong and lost all 3 seats at GE1997 that was won at GE1991 under Chiam See Tong's SDP.
Now PAP once again wants to unleash the Kraken in CSJ to confuse and disrupt alternative parties progress from GE2011 by agreeing to give discount from $500,000 to $30,000 so that CSJ can take part in elections. Destructive, disruptive and history repeats itself.
The only PAP 'B' Team Singaporeans witness past 20 years is SDP and Dr Chee.
Dr Chee broke up a perfectly growing SDP under Chiam See Tong and lost all 3 seats at GE1997 that was won at GE1991 under Chiam See Tong's SDP.
Now PAP once again wants to unleash the Kraken in CSJ to confuse and disrupt alternative parties progress from GE2011 by agreeing to give discount from $500,000 to $30,000 so that CSJ can take part in elections. Destructive, disruptive and history repeats itself.
Re: what really happened at hong lim park on saturday
HHH showed sinkees to stand up to the authorities; don't let them cow you. Demand that they have complied with the law.
The PAP can changed the laws to stifle critics ...then it is available for the world to see as it is in black and white.
HHH has guts and brains which majority of us do not have. We act like dogs.
HHH showed sinkees to stand up to the authorities; don't let them cow you. Demand that they have complied with the law.
The PAP can changed the laws to stifle critics ...then it is available for the world to see as it is in black and white.
HHH has guts and brains which majority of us do not have. We act like dogs.
Re: National Parks v Han Hui Hui
Yahoo News wouldn't dare to contradict the government, not after it was hammered by the PAP.
Kee Chiu is totally despicable. As a cabinet minister, he must be part of the decision maker to permit special needs children to be used as props to score a political point against its critics. How low can he get? He is a parent of a special need kid, yet he doesn't give a damn about using them for political purpose. Kee Chiu will eat his children next if that will enable him to win the next election?
Poor kids...
This is from Yahoo News.
Yahoo News wouldn't dare to contradict the government, not after it was hammered by the PAP.
Kee Chiu is totally despicable. As a cabinet minister, he must be part of the decision maker to permit special needs children to be used as props to score a political point against its critics. How low can he get? He is a parent of a special need kid, yet he doesn't give a damn about using them for political purpose. Kee Chiu will eat his children next if that will enable him to win the next election?
Re: National Parks v Han Hui Hui
Teo Ser Luck demands apology from Roy Ngerng over carnival disruption
SINGAPORE - Minister of State for Trade and Industry Teo Ser Luck has asked blogger Roy Ngerng to apologise for disrupting a weekend charity carnival at Hong Lim Park.
Mr Teo dismissed Mr Ngerng's defence that the protestors, who were there to protest on Central Provident Fund issues, "didn't know what was going on on the stage" when they marched toward the charity event and started chanting.
"Does it matter? What you have done frightened these children! You spoilt the day for these children with special needs who were looking forward to an enjoyable outing! For sure you have to apologise and more!" wrote Mr Teo on his Facebook page on Monday morning.
Mr Teo was the guest-of-honour at YMCA's Proms @ the Park carnival, which was held on Saturday afternoon.
Mr Ngerng and another blogger, Ms Han Hui Hui, had organised a protest on CPF issues at the park, coinciding with the charity carnival at the same venue.
According to a joint statement from National Parks (NParks) and the police, the two events had been allocated different spaces at the venue, one at each of the park's two lawns.
However, Mr Ngerng, 33, and Ms Han, 22 had led several hundred people on a march through the YMCA event, and allegedly heckling special-needs children who were on stage.
The protestors, some of whom were waving the Singapore flag, were chanting "Vote them out, PAP" and "Return our CPF", just as the children were about to perform a dance item.
According to reports, some protestors also confronted Mr Teo. He later told The Sunday Times that he had to console one of the children "frightened by all the heckling".
In a Facebook post on Sunday, Ms Han said the group did not heckle the special-needs children on stage as many said they did.
Mr Ngerng also added in his post that he would write to YMCA to try to meet the children "and give my sincere apologies", but added: "YMCA might have been retooled for a political purpose at the protest."
Videos of the encounter have been circulating on social media and drew criticism from netizens.
Non-Constituency MP Yee Jenn Jong, who is from the Workers' Party, posted a clip of a previous performance by special-needs teenagers on Facebook, saying: "I can't imagine how anyone can jeer at any of them, whatever the cause they may be fighting for."
But Mr Ngerng held his ground, describing their action as "the most groundbreaking protest (here) since 1965" on his blog.
Police said they are investigating the disruption.
[email protected]
Teo Ser Luck demands apology from Roy Ngerng over carnival disruption
SINGAPORE - Minister of State for Trade and Industry Teo Ser Luck has asked blogger Roy Ngerng to apologise for disrupting a weekend charity carnival at Hong Lim Park.
Mr Teo dismissed Mr Ngerng's defence that the protestors, who were there to protest on Central Provident Fund issues, "didn't know what was going on on the stage" when they marched toward the charity event and started chanting.
"Does it matter? What you have done frightened these children! You spoilt the day for these children with special needs who were looking forward to an enjoyable outing! For sure you have to apologise and more!" wrote Mr Teo on his Facebook page on Monday morning.
Mr Teo was the guest-of-honour at YMCA's Proms @ the Park carnival, which was held on Saturday afternoon.
Mr Ngerng and another blogger, Ms Han Hui Hui, had organised a protest on CPF issues at the park, coinciding with the charity carnival at the same venue.
According to a joint statement from National Parks (NParks) and the police, the two events had been allocated different spaces at the venue, one at each of the park's two lawns.
However, Mr Ngerng, 33, and Ms Han, 22 had led several hundred people on a march through the YMCA event, and allegedly heckling special-needs children who were on stage.
The protestors, some of whom were waving the Singapore flag, were chanting "Vote them out, PAP" and "Return our CPF", just as the children were about to perform a dance item.
According to reports, some protestors also confronted Mr Teo. He later told The Sunday Times that he had to console one of the children "frightened by all the heckling".
In a Facebook post on Sunday, Ms Han said the group did not heckle the special-needs children on stage as many said they did.
Mr Ngerng also added in his post that he would write to YMCA to try to meet the children "and give my sincere apologies", but added: "YMCA might have been retooled for a political purpose at the protest."
Videos of the encounter have been circulating on social media and drew criticism from netizens.
Non-Constituency MP Yee Jenn Jong, who is from the Workers' Party, posted a clip of a previous performance by special-needs teenagers on Facebook, saying: "I can't imagine how anyone can jeer at any of them, whatever the cause they may be fighting for."
But Mr Ngerng held his ground, describing their action as "the most groundbreaking protest (here) since 1965" on his blog.
Police said they are investigating the disruption.
[email protected]
Similar threads
