Yup, after Moyes blunder, Glazers and Ed did not sought SAF's opinion on the next two managers. How difficult could it be-get a 'top' manager,provide the funds and we're on our way to top 4,at least that's what they thought.
I have watched a number of commentaries about Mou's contract extension and about how the Ed and the board should have backed him.IMHO, all of them missed out on the big picture. First, it was a rebuilding job and one that was still in progress. Mou wanted to dispose of Martial who had an outstanding debut with LVG as manager and be replaced with Perisic who is a much older player. Short-termism kicked in full gear with Mou in his third year to boost his reputation (not the club) and leave the club at some point, with money in the bag and the reputation of the special one still intact.
Where the club and manager was concerned, the gap between them grew bigger with each passing year-short vs the long term goals. Second, there were other variables at play-FFP rules and the fact that United have invested alot on youth recently and their development will be curtailed if Mou had his way.
Mou lost the plot exacerbated somewhat by the free spending ways of neighbours City and rival Liverpool. It didn't help that they were getting the results. The performance of Salah and Debruyne who were once on his stable at Stamford Bridge cast a shadow on Mou's ability to bring the best out of players.
Mou polarized the dressing room and I suspect his long term assistant Faria left because he was sick of Mou's abrasive style of management.