Yes I mean sea sand. Sea sand from other countries will be very costly! I say all in jest! We should be thankful that so far we have not been invaded/annexed by bigger neighbours.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
RECLAIM LAND FROM MARINA BAY TO CHANGI. PREPARING FOR 10M POPULATION? WHAT DO YOU THINK?
- Thread starter ahleebabasingaporethief
- Start date
Yes I mean sea sand. Sea sand from other countries will be very costly! I say all in jest! We should be thankful that so far we have not been invaded/annexed by bigger neighbours.
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2010
- Messages
- 2,679
- Points
- 113
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2008
- Messages
- 5,211
- Points
- 63
upppzzzz
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2011
- Messages
- 24,162
- Points
- 113
No dignity! You want to scrap NS? More corruption? Why u want to destroy singapore? Oppies are so predictable.
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2008
- Messages
- 5,211
- Points
- 63
Global warming a total “hoax and scam” run by corrupt scientists, warns Greenpeace co-founder
03/15/2019 / By Ethan Huff
Though the organization today is among the most outspoken when it comes to drumming up mass hysteria over “global warming” and “climate change” – its homepage currently has a pop-up urging visitors to sign a petition to “Tell Congress to Push for a Green New Deal” – Greenpeace wasn’t always a shameless advocate for junk science.
In fact, the co-founder of Greenpeace Canada, Patrick Moore, recently spilled the beans during an interview on SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Tonight, explaining that not only is global warming completely fake, but that it’s also being used by social engineers around the world – including Greenpeace – to fear-monger the public in to giving up their rights and freedoms.
Speaking with hosts Rebecca Mansour and Joel Pollak, Moore held nothing back in revealing fear and guilt are being used as conversion tactics to draw more followers into the Cult of Climate Change – the endgame being to siphon as much cash from people as possible in order to implement a globalist system of governance in which nobody will be allowed to drive big cars, eat meat, use plastic, or in any other way “harm” the planet.
“Fear has been used all through history to gain control of people’s minds and wallets and all else, and the climate catastrophe is strictly a fear campaign – well, fear and guilt – you’re afraid you’re killing your children because you’re driving them in your SUV and emitting carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and you feel guilty for doing that,” Moore explained during his interview.
“There’s no stronger motivation than those two.”
For more news about the hoax that is global warming and climate change, be sure to visit GlobalWarming.Fetch.news and ClimateScienceNews.com.
“Green” companies are also a propaganda-driven fraud, Moore says
But what about all of the climate “scientists” who’ve reached a “consensus” that the earth is heating up because of cow farts, you might be asking? According to Moore, the whole thing is a faux-science racket driven by corrupt politicians and bureaucracies that are trying to centralize more political power and control, and that couldn’t care less about the environment.
It’s the same situation with so-called “green” companies, which are also fraudulent in that they’re simply mechanisms of deception designed to steal more taxpayer funds and funnel them into pet projects that never actually go anywhere.
Americans witnessed this under the Obama regime, when about $80 billion in “green” energy “stimulus” money was basically flushed down the toilet after it was learned that nearly 50 of the “green” energy companies that Obama subsidized on the taxpayer dime ultimately went belly-up.
The unholy trifecta of the “green movement,” the fake media, and corrupt politicians continue to drive the conspiracy theory of global warming and climate change, despite not having a shred of legitimate evidence or proof that these mythical concepts even exist – and the brainwashed masses just continue to gobble it all up.
“… you’ve got the green movement creating stories that instill fear in the public. You’ve got the media echo chamber – fake news – repeating it over and over and over again to everybody that they’re killing their children. And then you’ve got the green politicians who are buying scientists with government money to produce fear for them in the form of scientific-looking materials,” Moore says.
“And then you’ve got the green businesses, the rent-seekers, and the crony capitalists who are taking advantage of massive subsidies, huge tax write-offs, and government mandates requiring their technologies to make a fortune on this. And then, of course, you’ve got the scientists who are willingly, they’re basically hooked on government grants.”
You can listen to Moore’s full interview with Breitbart News Tonight at this link.
Sources for this article include:
03/15/2019 / By Ethan Huff
Though the organization today is among the most outspoken when it comes to drumming up mass hysteria over “global warming” and “climate change” – its homepage currently has a pop-up urging visitors to sign a petition to “Tell Congress to Push for a Green New Deal” – Greenpeace wasn’t always a shameless advocate for junk science.
In fact, the co-founder of Greenpeace Canada, Patrick Moore, recently spilled the beans during an interview on SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Tonight, explaining that not only is global warming completely fake, but that it’s also being used by social engineers around the world – including Greenpeace – to fear-monger the public in to giving up their rights and freedoms.
Speaking with hosts Rebecca Mansour and Joel Pollak, Moore held nothing back in revealing fear and guilt are being used as conversion tactics to draw more followers into the Cult of Climate Change – the endgame being to siphon as much cash from people as possible in order to implement a globalist system of governance in which nobody will be allowed to drive big cars, eat meat, use plastic, or in any other way “harm” the planet.
“Fear has been used all through history to gain control of people’s minds and wallets and all else, and the climate catastrophe is strictly a fear campaign – well, fear and guilt – you’re afraid you’re killing your children because you’re driving them in your SUV and emitting carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and you feel guilty for doing that,” Moore explained during his interview.
“There’s no stronger motivation than those two.”
For more news about the hoax that is global warming and climate change, be sure to visit GlobalWarming.Fetch.news and ClimateScienceNews.com.
“Green” companies are also a propaganda-driven fraud, Moore says
But what about all of the climate “scientists” who’ve reached a “consensus” that the earth is heating up because of cow farts, you might be asking? According to Moore, the whole thing is a faux-science racket driven by corrupt politicians and bureaucracies that are trying to centralize more political power and control, and that couldn’t care less about the environment.
It’s the same situation with so-called “green” companies, which are also fraudulent in that they’re simply mechanisms of deception designed to steal more taxpayer funds and funnel them into pet projects that never actually go anywhere.
Americans witnessed this under the Obama regime, when about $80 billion in “green” energy “stimulus” money was basically flushed down the toilet after it was learned that nearly 50 of the “green” energy companies that Obama subsidized on the taxpayer dime ultimately went belly-up.
The unholy trifecta of the “green movement,” the fake media, and corrupt politicians continue to drive the conspiracy theory of global warming and climate change, despite not having a shred of legitimate evidence or proof that these mythical concepts even exist – and the brainwashed masses just continue to gobble it all up.
“… you’ve got the green movement creating stories that instill fear in the public. You’ve got the media echo chamber – fake news – repeating it over and over and over again to everybody that they’re killing their children. And then you’ve got the green politicians who are buying scientists with government money to produce fear for them in the form of scientific-looking materials,” Moore says.
“And then you’ve got the green businesses, the rent-seekers, and the crony capitalists who are taking advantage of massive subsidies, huge tax write-offs, and government mandates requiring their technologies to make a fortune on this. And then, of course, you’ve got the scientists who are willingly, they’re basically hooked on government grants.”
You can listen to Moore’s full interview with Breitbart News Tonight at this link.
Sources for this article include:
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2008
- Messages
- 105,724
- Points
- 113
I said it before: the PAP govt is now using the 'climate change' nonsense as justification for launching various 'green' or 'sustainable' projects... more business for their cronies.
It also appeals to the silly millennials, the first time voters, who're social justice warriors (refer to the E-pay ad brownface incident) and environmental justice warriors (refer to the ban on plastic straws).
I'm sure Lee Hsien Loong got this feedback from the recent islandwide survey conducted by Gallup: with questions like 'Are you satisfied with the performance of Lee Hsien Loong?', 'On 1-10, how important do you rate the issue of climate change?' and 'On 1-10, how much do you trust the institutions* in Singapore?' etc.
*Institutions = courts, police, healthcare, infrastructure, water and utilities etc.
It also appeals to the silly millennials, the first time voters, who're social justice warriors (refer to the E-pay ad brownface incident) and environmental justice warriors (refer to the ban on plastic straws).
I'm sure Lee Hsien Loong got this feedback from the recent islandwide survey conducted by Gallup: with questions like 'Are you satisfied with the performance of Lee Hsien Loong?', 'On 1-10, how important do you rate the issue of climate change?' and 'On 1-10, how much do you trust the institutions* in Singapore?' etc.
*Institutions = courts, police, healthcare, infrastructure, water and utilities etc.
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2008
- Messages
- 5,211
- Points
- 63
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2019
- Messages
- 11,031
- Points
- 113
maybe the clue is in his name... "chop pig"...
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2008
- Messages
- 5,211
- Points
- 63
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2008
- Messages
- 5,211
- Points
- 63
Main contributors to the video: 1. Professor Tim Ball - Dept. of Climatology - University of Winnepeg, Canada 2. Professor Nir Shaviv - Institute of Physics - University of Jerusalem, Israel 3. Professor Ian Clark - Dept. of Earth Sciences - University of Ottawa, Canada 4. Dr. Piers Corbyn, Solar Physicist, Climate Forecaster, Weather Action, UK 5. Professor John Christy - Dept. of Atmospheric Science - University of Alabama, Huntsville - Lead Author, IPCC (NASA Medal - Exceptional Scientific Achievement) 6. Professor Philip Stott - Dept of Biogeography - University of London, UK 7. Al Gore - Former Presidental Candidate 8. Margaret Thatcher - Global-Warming Promoter 9. Professor Paul Reiter - IPCC & Pasteur Institute, Paris, France 10. Professor Richard Lindzen - IPCC & M.I.T. 11. Patrick Moore - Co-Founder - Greenpeace 12. Dr. Roy Spencer - Weather Satellite Team Leader - NASA 13. Professor Patrick Michaels - Department of Environmental Sciences - University of Virginia, US 14. Nigel Calder - Former Editor - New Scientist 15. James Shikwati - Economist & Author 16. Lord Lawson of Blaby - Secretary of Energy - UK Parliament Investigator, UK 17. Professor Syun-Ichi Akasofu - Director, International Arctic Research Centre 18. Professor Fredrick Singer - Former Director, US National Weather Service 19. Professor Carl Wunsch - Dept. of Oceanography - M.I.T., Harvard, University College, London, University of Cambridge, UK 20. Professor Eigil Friis-Christensen - Director, Danish National Space Centre 21. Dr. Roy Spencer - NASA Weather Satellite Team Leader 22. Paul Driessen - Author: Green Power, Black Death
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2008
- Messages
- 5,211
- Points
- 63
William Lind looks beneath the global warming narrative
Larry Kummer, Editor Climate change, Politics, Science & Nature 14 April 2019
Summary: William Lind takes a sharp and accurate look at the politics of climate change. In modern America, always look beneath the glossy surface of narratives in the news.
ID 37081031 © Eduard Boldok | Dreamstime. Global Warming
By William S. Lind at Traditional Right, 10 April 2019.
Posted with his generous permission.
A March 15 article by Larry Kummer at the Fabius Maximus website discusses how global warming advocates have misused a worst-case scenario to generate panic. Titled “About the corruption of climate science”, Kummer’s article details how politicians are misrepresenting climate projections, especially one called RCP 8.5. That their goal is to create fear should not surprise us: from the government’s perspective, fear is a growth industry.
Russell Kirk called conservatism “Politics Of Prudence
”, and prudence suggests we should pay some attention to climate change, or, to be more precise, increasing volatility in weather. That is something we can observe happening. Conservatives’ belief in stewardship means we owe it to future generations to hand them a planet in at least as good condition as we received from our forefathers. Reducing our own consumption, including of fossil fuels, is desirable.
But the Left seeks far more. In fact, its goal is nothing less than total control of every aspect of human life, which we call “totalitarianism”, justified by fear of climate change. Since everything a person does, including breathing, affects the climate, if climate change is a huge threat, someone needs to control everything. That “someone” should obviously be whoever is most concerned about the climate, i.e., the extreme environmentalists and the larger coalition of which they are part, the culturally Marxist Left.
Every totalitarian ideology offers a one-factor explanation of why it deserves power over everyone and everything. For Marxism-Leninism, it was that the whole condition of man and society was determined by ownership of the means of production. The Communist Party, through the state, therefore had to control all producers and consumers, i.e., everyone. Today’s cultural Marxists argue that all of history is determined by which groups, defined by race and gender, have power over which other groups. Therefore, they, through the state, must have complete control over all such groups and everyone in them.
National Socialism justified its demand for total control by the need for racial purity, since race determined everything, and Fascism’s power derived from its theory that everyone was defined by their corporate role in society. Mussolini said, “Everything for the state, nothing against the state, nothing outside the state.” Italy’s congenital inefficiency made sure that didn’t happen, but it is what all ideologies seek–including the ideology of environmentalism, for it is ideology, not science, that drives those sowing panic about global warming.
Theirs is an ideology of which we should warn even more strongly than other ideologies, because, again, everything we do affects the environment. This makes their demand for total control seem even more justifiable. Add in widespread public panic over increasingly volatile weather and you have an excellent basis on which everyone should surrender their freedom. Why, humanity itself stands on the brink of extinction. How can you justify your puny desires to do as you please?
We need a global warning against overstatements of global warming and its consequences. In fact, we have been for several centuries in a period of unusual climate stability. We cannot expect that to go on forever, because we know that in the past, the climate has changed and weather has become more volatile. Human ingenuity should prove adequate to deal with it, so long as we do not block that ingenuity through too much government intervention. Yes, overpopulated areas with dysfunctional states and cultures are likely to suffer, as they will under any scenario. The solution is not to let them come here, unless we want to become them.
Meanwhile, when we hear hysterical statements about global warming ending life as we know it in a few decades, we should remind ourselves that this is politics, not science. It is politics designed to panic us into surrendering our freedoms to a new, hideous totalitarian ideology. For those who want to see how such a totalitarianism might play out, read about Cascadia in Thomas Hobbes’ {AKA WIlliam Lind’s} recent novel, Victoria: A Novel of 4th Generation War
.
————————————–
The Left looks at climate change and see an opportunity
Lind points to an obvious but too-seldom mentioned fact: to many on the Left, stoking fears of climate change are a means to gain power. They have been quite open about that. As Matthew C. Nisbet says in “Sciences, Publics, Politics: The Green New Dilemma“, from Issues in Science and Technology, Spring 2019.
“Progressives see climate change as not only a crisis but also an opportunity. As argued by Naomi Klein in her 2014 best-selling book, This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate
, a climate movement inspired by bold policy proposals such as the Green New Deal, and equal in intensity to political movements that battled slavery and colonialism, would allow an alliance of left-wing groups to achieve a diverse range of social justice goals. For progressives, climate change, she argued, is the best chance to right the ‘festering wrongs’ of colonialism and slavery, ‘the unfinished business of liberation.’”
Proposals for a Green New Deal end the masquerade, proudly announcing that “fighting” climate change is a means to larger ends. See About the Green New Deal, dreams given form.
Larry Kummer, Editor Climate change, Politics, Science & Nature 14 April 2019
Summary: William Lind takes a sharp and accurate look at the politics of climate change. In modern America, always look beneath the glossy surface of narratives in the news.
ID 37081031 © Eduard Boldok | Dreamstime. Global WarmingBy William S. Lind at Traditional Right, 10 April 2019.
Posted with his generous permission.
A March 15 article by Larry Kummer at the Fabius Maximus website discusses how global warming advocates have misused a worst-case scenario to generate panic. Titled “About the corruption of climate science”, Kummer’s article details how politicians are misrepresenting climate projections, especially one called RCP 8.5. That their goal is to create fear should not surprise us: from the government’s perspective, fear is a growth industry.
Russell Kirk called conservatism “Politics Of Prudence
But the Left seeks far more. In fact, its goal is nothing less than total control of every aspect of human life, which we call “totalitarianism”, justified by fear of climate change. Since everything a person does, including breathing, affects the climate, if climate change is a huge threat, someone needs to control everything. That “someone” should obviously be whoever is most concerned about the climate, i.e., the extreme environmentalists and the larger coalition of which they are part, the culturally Marxist Left.
Every totalitarian ideology offers a one-factor explanation of why it deserves power over everyone and everything. For Marxism-Leninism, it was that the whole condition of man and society was determined by ownership of the means of production. The Communist Party, through the state, therefore had to control all producers and consumers, i.e., everyone. Today’s cultural Marxists argue that all of history is determined by which groups, defined by race and gender, have power over which other groups. Therefore, they, through the state, must have complete control over all such groups and everyone in them.
National Socialism justified its demand for total control by the need for racial purity, since race determined everything, and Fascism’s power derived from its theory that everyone was defined by their corporate role in society. Mussolini said, “Everything for the state, nothing against the state, nothing outside the state.” Italy’s congenital inefficiency made sure that didn’t happen, but it is what all ideologies seek–including the ideology of environmentalism, for it is ideology, not science, that drives those sowing panic about global warming.
Theirs is an ideology of which we should warn even more strongly than other ideologies, because, again, everything we do affects the environment. This makes their demand for total control seem even more justifiable. Add in widespread public panic over increasingly volatile weather and you have an excellent basis on which everyone should surrender their freedom. Why, humanity itself stands on the brink of extinction. How can you justify your puny desires to do as you please?
We need a global warning against overstatements of global warming and its consequences. In fact, we have been for several centuries in a period of unusual climate stability. We cannot expect that to go on forever, because we know that in the past, the climate has changed and weather has become more volatile. Human ingenuity should prove adequate to deal with it, so long as we do not block that ingenuity through too much government intervention. Yes, overpopulated areas with dysfunctional states and cultures are likely to suffer, as they will under any scenario. The solution is not to let them come here, unless we want to become them.
Meanwhile, when we hear hysterical statements about global warming ending life as we know it in a few decades, we should remind ourselves that this is politics, not science. It is politics designed to panic us into surrendering our freedoms to a new, hideous totalitarian ideology. For those who want to see how such a totalitarianism might play out, read about Cascadia in Thomas Hobbes’ {AKA WIlliam Lind’s} recent novel, Victoria: A Novel of 4th Generation War
————————————–
The Left looks at climate change and see an opportunity
Lind points to an obvious but too-seldom mentioned fact: to many on the Left, stoking fears of climate change are a means to gain power. They have been quite open about that. As Matthew C. Nisbet says in “Sciences, Publics, Politics: The Green New Dilemma“, from Issues in Science and Technology, Spring 2019.
“Progressives see climate change as not only a crisis but also an opportunity. As argued by Naomi Klein in her 2014 best-selling book, This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate
Proposals for a Green New Deal end the masquerade, proudly announcing that “fighting” climate change is a means to larger ends. See About the Green New Deal, dreams given form.
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2008
- Messages
- 5,211
- Points
- 63
Seems like most people here can't be bothered about the on going con.
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2019
- Messages
- 6,840
- Points
- 113
Yes I mean sea sand. Sea sand from other countries will be very costly! I say all in jest! We should be thankful that so far we have not been invaded/annexed by bigger neighbours.
Today Stinkypore can't be invaded/annexed by its bigger neighbours. That window of opportunity existed in the 1970s.
However, with the passage of time, given stinkypore's tiny landmass, and increasing population, affluence, spending power, education, knowledge, scientific advancements, tech and possibly military might acquired by stinky's neighbours, it's a foregone conclusion what the future holds for stinkypore.
Population is the real kingmaker in the world of geopolitics.
Similar threads
