Ravi wants police to return HHH's notebook by Wednesday 4pm

[Confuseous]

The lawyer representing Han Hui Hui has issued a letter to the Singapore Police to demand the return of a note book which the authorities had seized from his client.

Ms Han had taken notes during the interview with her note book, but it was seized by the police officer who interviewed her.

The letter by M Ravi said that Ms Han had made a written record of the questions and her answers put to her in an interview with Senior Investigation Officer, Inspector Wong Yu Wei, on 10 October 2014 at the Central Police Division.

“This personal record was prepared so that she would have accurate details of the matters in question for her legal advisers, and as such it constituted a privileged legal communication,” Mr Ravi said in his letter.

“It is a matter of the gravest concern that it appears this personal record was seized from her at the interview and had not been returned to her,” he added.

Mr Ravi’s letter also requested “an explanation for the wrongful seizure of private property from our client.”

It demanded that the note book be returned to Ms Han by 4pm on Wednesday, 15 October.

Ms Han was called in to assist the police in its investigation into “an offence of unlawful assembly” at Hong Lim Park on 27 September.

She was later reported to have been at the police interview for more than seven hours, and emerged from the police station at about 10pm.

To date, The Online Citizen understands that more than...
http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2014/10/return-han-hui-huis-note-book-lawyer-tells-police/

 

[xingguy]

Han Hui Hui's Lawyer Writes To Poilice Demanding They Return Her Notebook

Source: The Real Singapore

HAN HUI HUI’S LAWYER WRITES TO POLICE DEMANDING THEY RETURN HER NOTEBOOK
Post date: 14 Oct 2014 - 11:58am

Lawyer M Ravi, who is representing Ms Han Hui Hui has written a letter to the Singapore Police to demand that they return Ms Han her notebook which they took while interviewing her on Friday.

In his letter, M Ravi explained that Ms Han was making noted about the questions and answers that that she gave to the officers during her questioning.

She had taken the notebook down to the Police Cantonment Complex when she was asked to come own for questioning in regards to a case of unlawful assembly. She was interviewed for almost 8 hours that day.

M Ravi noted that the notebook was a personal record for Ms Han so that she would have an accurate record of what happened during the interview so that she could give it to her legal advisers.

He explained that it constituted privileged legal communication and it is a matter of grave concern that her personal records were seized from her during the interview and not returned.

M Ravi said that this was wrongful seizer of her private property and Ms Han deserves a proper explanation.

In his letter, M Ravi wrote that the police have until 4pm on Wednesday 15 October to return Ms Han her notebook.

Below is the copy of the legal letter courtesy of M.Ravi:

---

End Of Article​

---

 

[xingguy]

Re: Han Hui Hui's Lawyer Writes To Poilice Demanding They Return Her Notebook

Source: TR EMERITUS

Ravi’s letter demanding police to return Hui Hui’s private property
October 14th, 2014 | Author: Contributions

14 October 2014

Central Police Division
No. 391 New Bridge Road
Police Cantonment Complex
Block A, #03-112
Singapore 088762

Attn: Senior Investigation Officer, Inspector Wong Yu Wei

Dear Sirs,

HAN HUI HUI (NRIC NO. S*******H) WRONGFUL SEIZURE OF LEGALLY PRIVILEGED DOCUMENT

1. We act for Han Hui Hui.

2. We are instructed that our client, acting on legal advice, made a written record of the questions and her answers put to her in an interview with Senior Investigation Officer, Inspector Wong Yu Wei on 10 October 2014 at Central Police Division. This personal record was prepared so that she would have accurate details of the matters in question for her legal advisers, and as such it constituted a privileged legal communication.

3. It is a matter of the gravest concern that it appears this personal record was seized from her at the interview and has not been returned to her.

4. We request an explanation for the wrongful seizure of private property from our client.

5. We hereby serve you with a formal demand on behalf of our client for the return of the personal record to our client, who has authorised us to receive it on her behalf, not later than 1600 hours Wednesday 15 October 2014.

6. We place you on formal notice that this document is a private document over which legal professional privilege is asserted.

7. All our client’s rights are expressly reserved.



Yours faithfully,

M Ravi

cc. client

Lawyer M Ravi

---

End Of Article​

---

 

[laksaboy]

Re: Han Hui Hui's Lawyer Writes To Poilice Demanding They Return Her Notebook

Too late, their computer forensic poodle dogs have probably siphoned all the data, hoping to retain some incriminating evidence and use it against her in future.

When the law enforcement thugs knock on your door, hide, move away or destroy the storage devices which may contain sensitive data.

They can confiscate the computer, but that'll be without the hard disks.

 

[mojito]

Re: Han Hui Hui's Lawyer Writes To Poilice Demanding They Return Her Notebook

I hope the police will not confiscate my porn stash.

 

[usedtojb]

Did the person get it back?

 

[Sinkie]

Why didn't she go with her lawyer? She and the others know the police is investigating some unlawful assembly so she should be prepared with legal counsel and not get herself into such a situation. The question is which lawyer is willing to go with her in the first place.

Also, there is no reason to confiscate her laptop and notebook. All statements must get a copy. Normally, the interviewer will give excuses not to give you a copy, but you must have a copy. There is no two way about it. Every statement you sign for, you must have a set. Sorry, this is so very important.....but getting legal counsel to accompany you is just as important, because in any case, if you're charged, you will still need legal counsel, so get them involved in the very first instance.

But some lawyers or should I say most lawyers are also just as intimidated as you and when they're told they can't join the interview, they end up sitting outside waiting. But no, a lawyer must accompany you, because you don't know the law or the process. Only lawyers do and it is your right.

 

[methink]

Why didn't she go with her lawyer? She and the others know the police is investigating some unlawful assembly so she should be prepared with legal counsel and not get herself into such a situation. The question is which lawyer is willing to go with her in the first place.

Also, there is no reason to confiscate her laptop and notebook. All statements must get a copy. Normally, the interviewer will give excuses not to give you a copy, but you must have a copy. There is no two way about it. Every statement you sign for, you must have a set. Sorry, this is so very important.....but getting legal counsel to accompany you is just as important, because in any case, if you're charged, you will still need legal counsel, so get them involved in the very first instance.

But some lawyers or should I say most lawyers are also just as intimidated as you and when they're told they can't join the interview, they end up sitting outside waiting. But no, a lawyer must accompany you, because you don't know the law or the process. Only lawyers do and it is your right.

You sure you know the law? "...a lawyer must accompany you, because you don't know the law or the process. Only lawyers do and it is your right."

 

[bakkuttay]

farker loong, you are just a bully. 2016 will seal your doom

 

[potato29]

notebook

 

[Yingge]

You sure you know the law? "...a lawyer must accompany you, because you don't know the law or the process. Only lawyers do and it is your right."

His law knowledge come from Hong Kong movies which all not suitable for Singapore...

 

[Leongsam]

And what if the police aren't scared of Ravi and refuse to comply?

What sort of retribution is in store for them?

 

[Equalisation]

Ada stains ?

 

[Yingge]

And what if the police aren't scared of Ravi and refuse to comply?

What sort of retribution is in store for them?

They will go TOC, TR or SBF to cry father and cry mother.

 

[sleaguepunter]

They will go TOC, TR or SBF to cry father and cry mother.

no point getting the device back as mata sure put monitoring virus into the notebook to access triple h future activities on the net.

in fact, triple h should shut down her facebook, email, twitter, etc etc... and start a new account again with a new laptop or PC.

inspector wong? I doubt it, that just a front, maybe higher rank than inspector in isd.

 

[methink]

no point getting the device back as mata sure put monitoring virus into the notebook to access triple h future activities on the net.

in fact, triple h should shut down her facebook, email, twitter, etc etc... and start a new account again with a new laptop or PC.

inspector wong? I doubt it, that just a front, maybe higher rank than inspector in isd.

hello... it is a note...book for writing lah. How to put a virus? Ebola is it?

 

[sleaguepunter]

hello... it is a note...book for writing lah. How to put a virus? Ebola is it?

oh.... paper type one ha?

paiseh paiseh...

 

[angrycowboy]

so is notebook or laptop?

 

[butoh6050]

oh.... paper type one ha?

paiseh paiseh...

Lol......made my day.

 

[halsey02]

And what if the police aren't scared of Ravi and refuse to comply?

What sort of retribution is in store for them?

The retribution for "them" would be , more "x" will be marked, thus reducing the majority....