@Wikiphile.. Good Analysis.. Noted. So what i have gathered is.. The Only problem with Farquer was the Influx of Migrants into the Island and he had trouble with governing
the population..In terms of Crime.. But did a good job in the Economy aspect.
Dont forget the North Indians and Arabs There was a very large no. of them before the Influx of the Tamils and Chinese.
Any other Races during that Period?
Anyone one got any Idea on The stats of the Different Races etc. Indians(North and South), Chinese and Malays(Java,Bugis etc) as the Island was Growing.. On a Yearly basic?
What were this Group of Individuals working as or was Brought in to do..(In terms of Race) Etc.. Arabs as Traders....
@Azn ... We are not arguing we are Discussing History.
Social Studies didnt teach much..
Gujarats, Punjabs, Dhobis, Sikhs are all North Indians. Majority of the Early North Indian settlers in Singapore came from UttarPradesh. @About why we eat all this south Indian cuisine is There is a very large no. of them Right from the Beginning or Once the British East India company has already Establishd a foothold in Singapore. During the Initiate migration or the Arrival of the East India Company it also arrived with a very large no. of North Indians but after which more laborers from the South was brought in thus having more Tamils here(All within the same period la) Most north-indians in Singapore you come across(True blue) have at least 3 or 4 generation in their Family, Alot have longer generation linage AND Yes the Arabs as well.
success of sg lies with sinkies. british colonizers knew it, and everywhere they went to colonize, they brought the same stinkies along. throw sinkies anywhere on this planet and they will thrive, thanks to the sinkie spirit of wanting to show off. sinkies thrive best with the absence of control freaks, supervisors and mentors, and especially the absence of a particular mentor.
heh heh...u sure or not...
i have seen sinkies getting lost like a rudderless ship...
In Singapore that is..
no body is twisting anything...what you have just wrote are simply honoring the guy who planted the flag. Not the guys / un-named guys who has sweated and toiled to enable this guy to plant the flag.
LKY kept quiet about who did it all and let the twisted media to create a false impression that the-man-who did-it-all as the hero in the minds of these dumb citizens. When Goh keng Swee died, strangely ... the-man-who did-it-all was overshadowed by 'the fact' that the late Goh K.S. was the one who PIONEERED the SAF (defense dept), the HDB (p.k.a SIT), the MOE, the JTC, etc. All these are important area to show that you are capable. BUT, of course it is STILL the people that toiled with their sweat, blood, and tears to eventually erected the needle of success. What can the old man say ? He didn't say anything ? What did his book say ? All warped minded citizens will worship a liar from day one. That's the disgrace as being a Singa-Poo person.
Obviously, the media warped and twisted the mind of the daft Sinkies ! Sad, very sad.
One thing for sure.. I cant stand it when the Media/Reporters and Daft Pap bastard supporters start saying LKY IS FOUNDER OF MODERN SINGAPORE. What rubbish is that? Thats the biggest bull-shit i have heard about Singapore. Its clear to me.. Singapore join Malaya to Gain independence from the British, As the British didnt want to give Independence to Singapore. Singaporeans was later kicked out by Tengku Or Lky was Stirring shit up in malaysia Parliament and asked to leave. Which Tengku said Fine F OFF.
So its abit sketchy at the moment. Did tengku kick us out Thus creating the Independent State of Singapura or Did Lky asked for a Split from Malaysia as There was social problems with the two States and only Splitting will solve this social Problems... But no way is LKY the Modern Founder of Singapore. That i cannot understand how people can come up with... LKY is to me, The 1st Prime Minister of Independent Singapore.