Shit and pee doesn't break any of the 10 Commandments. moslem fake prophet, muhammad, broke the 10 commandments by coveting other people's possessions, women, stealing and killing. Only a sick theology will tell you that such a vile person could be a prophet.
Of course it doesn't. But doesn't that sounds ridiculous that your god has to shit and pee and eat and go hungry? GOD? Really? That is why your beliefs are false when you frame god as a weakling.
mahomet isn't a prophet. Didn't you continously mock Jesus for being impotent because he didn't have an army to save him from being arrested and tortured by the romans?
We are actually mocking you, not Jesus, for elevating Jesus into a god when he is just a human being. It makes absolute sense than him being god, no?
Basic theology will have taught you that Jesus upheld all the previous laws by his sacrifice, so that Man can be made righteous before God. Jesus also said clearly that He is the Way, the Truth and the Life. No one can ever get to the Father except through Him. How come you refuse to follow even though you boast that you respect Jesus? Instead, you follow a fake prophet who broke all the laws by his own sinful personal conduct of a thief, murderer and pedophile.
So what happened to all the previous people and prophets before Jesus came?
You are right that Jesus in his life upheld all the previous laws brought also by all the previous prophets like the 1st Commamndment:
Hear Ye oh Israel, Your Lord is ONE! (Not THREE Ok?)
2nd Commandment:
Ye shall not make unto god any graven image
Go into any church and what do you see? You are a pagan and polytheist.
The fact that you say an adult pays for his own sins shows that you don't understand basic theology, let alone follow Jesus. It is recorded that Jesus forgave sinful people like the adulterous woman and the crucified thief instead of demanding that they pay for their own sins. It is clear to even a child that you do not know Jesus, let alone are like Him.
That passage about the adulterous woman is a fabrication that they put into the bible after the 3rd century. Christian scholars have found no such passage in the earliest manuscripts and thus have removed them from the latest edition of the bible.
For people reading this, don't take my word for it. Research it yourself and see who is lying.
Then the biggest question will be, if they continually change the bible, what is the true words of god in the bible and what is corrupted? Then the whole book is useless because until you find the original, you have to assume the book has been totally tampered that is why loads of contradictions exist.
Repent JT.