• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Queen of England took Ivermectin for covid

Screenshot_20220223-132347_Gallery.jpg
 
:roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao: whatever you say to keep your merry band of cretins dancing

I'm just stating the obvious everyone is free to draw their own conclusions but there is no smoke without fire. There is no other rational explanation as to why Ivermectin images were used in the news report.

The notion that it was just an "editing error" won't wash with most but of course will be pushed by those with vested interests in suppressing the use of a cheap an effective drug.
 
What is there to apologise for? The truth is out and none of these subsequent retractions change the facts of the case. All it does is prove what lying scumbags the media has turned out to be. They'll report whatever their masters tell them to.

Stromectol was obviously mentioned as being part of the Queen's treatment. Why else would the MSM extract stock photos of the drug for insertion into the news report?
It's certainly a possibility, but there are others. Could be some kwai lan editor inserted it there as part of his personal agenda for instance. Either way we can have a suspicion, but concrete proof that she took it is not there. Not unless you get her doctor to spill the beans.

I'm reminded of the time when an intern created a scandalous news segment :

 
It's certainly a possibility, but there are others. Could be some kwai lan editor inserted it there as part of his personal agenda for instance. Either way we can have a suspicion, but concrete proof that she took it is not there. Not unless you get her doctor to spill the beans.

I'm reminded of the time when an intern created a scandalous news segment :



It just shows what morons most of these talking heads are. To think that some of them are actually paid big bucks is mind blowing. I guess it stems from the fact that half the world's population has below average intelligence which therefore provides sufficient numbers of eyeballs to actually watch and listen to the crap they spew.
 
someone has already traced the activities of a certain doctor in amarikar , the research he did during the 80s till 2018 , the agencies involved ,
and the development of a vaccine in parallel with the research done on virus. the research centre is not at fort detrick , he also revealed how the armarikag
roped in a female chinese doctor in order to blame China later.
 
It just shows what morons most of these talking heads are. To think that some of them are actually paid big bucks is mind blowing. I guess it stems from the fact that half the world's population has below average intelligence which therefore provides sufficient numbers of eyeballs to actually watch and listen to the crap they spew.
you are totally correct ! many look at the world with a simplistic view. many major events happening are planned decades ago.
 
Last edited:
If every one took ivermectin there wouldn't be any for the people that mattered now, would there? :unsure:
 
It just shows what morons most of these talking heads are. To think that some of them are actually paid big bucks is mind blowing. I guess it stems from the fact that half the world's population has below average intelligence which therefore provides sufficient numbers of eyeballs to actually watch and listen to the crap they spew.
Actually, the average person is by rightful definition a moron. Humans like to think they are special and entitled and point to their lifestyles, knowledge and possessions as prima facie evidence. That is a false conclusion. The truth of the matter is that until you get both high IQ and subscribe to logical thinking, most humans are no better than well-trained animals with sophisticated daily rituals. That number of rational thinkers is not even half the population....

Most humans ride around in cars and buses and planes, but I will guarantee you that a very large percentage of those humans have a very poor grasp of the principles behind the machinery that allows daily transport. I remember an old post you made explaining newtonian reaction forces as an example. A higher percentage will know how to build and maintain that machinery, but still far from half.

This doesn't end there. A lot of so-called sophisticated professions, doctors for eg don't seem to have a full picture of the research that goes into proving the science behind their practice. A large percentage of them seem to swallow wholesale accepted practice without question. I guess it's too difficult, too risky or not rewarding enough to question the research they're given. Far easier to toe the party line and make their wages.

Anyway, back to the bottom line, it's a good day if 10% of your population can think for themselves. The rest just fall into identity politics and rituals, such as following religion, following the agenda from the political party they identify with, following others from their "race" or nationality. And since there's so much of the population looking to actively self-identify, there's a lot of bucks out there. That's why your talking head gets the fame, fortune and rewards.

Disgusting eh this planet? :laugh:

P.S. You'll probably come to the same conclusion as Cousteau at the end of his life. That most of humanity should go the way of the dodo and that only a few hundred thousand rational humans should be left on the planet.
 
Back
Top