I don't see the issue with Article 134 1(a). If you read it in context with the 22 years thing, then it becomes quite clear.
The Constitution gives the government the right to revoke citizenship of dual citizens over the age of 18, but government policy seems to be to apply it only to dual citizens over the age of 22. This means they have discretion and they are applying discretion.
Now the question is if the government has been applying this discretion to exempt certain individuals. It's certainly possible, but you also have to bear in mind that cases of dual citizenship over the age of 22 may not necessarily be exemption cases, because the government can only revoke a dual citizenship if they know about it. How hard is it to hide dual citizenship if you become naturalized in another country after the age of 22?
The Constitution gives the government the right to revoke citizenship of dual citizens over the age of 18, but government policy seems to be to apply it only to dual citizens over the age of 22. This means they have discretion and they are applying discretion.
Now the question is if the government has been applying this discretion to exempt certain individuals. It's certainly possible, but you also have to bear in mind that cases of dual citizenship over the age of 22 may not necessarily be exemption cases, because the government can only revoke a dual citizenship if they know about it. How hard is it to hide dual citizenship if you become naturalized in another country after the age of 22?
Last edited: