You are such an idiot. These are trade values, where imports also correlate to exports, especially when Singapore is a major transhipment hub for goods in transit. I'm referring to direct Chinese investments in the 2 respective countries concerned.
If you want to be prove your intelligence, you should start to utilize your little brain better to research for yourself that the deficit between Malaysia and China in 2015 was US$7.2b.
Hence, there were nett dollars coming in to Malaysia from China. You should ask yourself where are some of these monies have gone to? On the other hand, there was a surplus of US$5.6b between Singapore and China in 2015. Need I explain myself further? You should never embarrass yourself here if you want to be credible.
Can you do a proper research yourself before daring to comment on others. Otherwise, you'll just lower your self dignity. I think you should have the basic intellectual to understand what I mean when I say "birds of the same feathers flock together", or do you not?
I still remember what my Taiwanese clients had once told me: Singaporeans can never be too successful in China because they are too straightforward and direct.
Sources:
http://www.worldstopexports.com/singapores-top-import-partners/
http://www.worldstopexports.com/malaysias-top-import-partners/
[You are such an idiot. These are trade values, where imports also correlate to exports, especially when Singapore is a major transhipment hub for goods in transit. I'm referring to direct Chinese investments in the 2 respective countries concerned. ]
If this was what you meant you should not blame people for not understanding you before because you said what you meant only now.
So you mean biggest trade partners are not flocking together and trade closely?
[If you want to be prove your intelligence, you should start to utilize your little brain better to research for yourself that the deficit between Malaysia and China in 2015 was US$7.2b. Hence, there were nett dollars coming in to Malaysia from China. You should ask yourself where are some of these monies have gone to?]
It is silly to suggest because there are net FDI inflows into malaysia therefore there are up to no good.
Aside China, many other countries have net FDI in Malaysia including Singapore
FDI BY COUNTRY
The top five investing countries for inflows in 2014 namely Singapore, Netherlands, Hong Kong, Cayman Islands and Bermuda. These countries recorded a total of RM22.4 billion or 63.4 per cent of the total inflows in Malaysia. With regard to position as at end 2014, FDI investment was mainly originated from Singapore, Japan, Netherlands, USA and Norway which amounted to a total of RM257.7 billion or 55.1 per cent of total position in Malaysia.
Singapore has been investing a cumulative over one hundred billions in China. Did you ask where this money has gone to?
Singapore has also been investing a cumulative over 40 billions in Malaysia so far. Did you ask where this money has gone to?
http://www.tablebuilder.singstat.gov.sg/publicfacing/createDataTable.action?refId=5662
Btw, Singapore has also been investing a cumulative over hundred billions in tax haven countries like caymans, Bermuda,... so far. Did you ask where this money has gone to?