WP is nothing more than a party which is using anti PAP votes to challenge PAP at the ballot box but does nothing much to challenge PAP in real issues... The voters have been keep in the dark.. Pritam probably sees a coalition where PAP offers him some deputy minister post in future.. The way I see the WP challenge PAP is like a bunch of panties wearing rich people(not workers) who will eventually bed the enemy for self glory..
As Yaw Shin Loong puts it, voting for PAP is for national interest.. And Hougang people are silly enough to vote for a man who believes in this. If WP is just like PAP, its better to go for PAP because we know them very well.. Many people including me will probably switch back to PAP if WP gets too strong..
Whats the use of having WP if they will eventually embrace the same policies as PAP, perhaps with slight revisions.. Look at the Lib Dems in UK, voters are rejecting them at the ballot box.. The Labour party will probably get a lot of the lib dem's votes and go on to form the next government..
If WP does not stand up to PAP, I rather vote PAP.. I agree with Goh Meng Seng on this following point.. If Slyvia, Yaw and Low want to use the anti PAP momentum to get more seats in Parliament and eventually form a govt with PAP with their top people being offered cabinet posts, then please tell the voters, we are not dumb..
Chen Show Mao recently compares WP to Wei Zheng.. Historically, Wei Zheng served the enemy.. Tang Taizhong killed his brothers at Xuanwumen and upsurped the throne.. And Wei Zheng was the teacher of Li JianCheng(Crown Prince) who was killed by Li ShiMin... PAP is no Tang Dynasty although both headed by a Lee.. PM is no Li Shimin.. I think the electorate is not sophisticated enough to understand WP's real intentions.. That is to be the side kick of PAP and eventualli bed them..
I can tell you guys empirically that if WP and Low were as much of a threat as JBJ and Francis, Low would not be allowed to survive for so long, let along wrestle a GRC from them..