- Joined
- Jan 22, 2015
- Messages
- 4,143
- Points
- 113
Here is what ChatGPT have to say :
In Singapore, Members of Parliament (MPs), including opposition leaders, are protected by parliamentary privilege while participating in parliamentary proceedings. This privilege is intended to allow MPs to speak freely during debates, committees, or other parliamentary activities without fear of legal consequences, including defamation suits or other criminal actions. However, this privilege is not absolute.
If an MP, such as "Mr. P," provides false answers before the Committee of Privileges, it could lead to serious consequences. While parliamentary privilege protects MPs from legal action for statements made within Parliament, it does not shield them from accountability for misconduct or dishonesty. The Committee of Privileges is empowered to investigate and take action against MPs for breaches of parliamentary privilege, including giving false evidence.
Possible Outcomes:
1. Internal Disciplinary Action: The Committee of Privileges can recommend disciplinary actions, such as a reprimand, suspension, or expulsion from Parliament, depending on the severity of the misconduct.
2. Legal Action: In certain cases, the Committee of Privileges can refer the matter to law enforcement if it involves criminal behavior, such as perjury, which is a criminal offense in Singapore. Perjury (lying under oath) is a serious crime and can lead to criminal charges outside the scope of parliamentary privilege.
In short, while MPs enjoy certain immunities under parliamentary privilege, this does not extend to deliberately giving false evidence before a parliamentary committee. Misconduct of this nature can lead to both internal disciplinary measures and, potentially, criminal charges.
In Singapore, Members of Parliament (MPs), including opposition leaders, are protected by parliamentary privilege while participating in parliamentary proceedings. This privilege is intended to allow MPs to speak freely during debates, committees, or other parliamentary activities without fear of legal consequences, including defamation suits or other criminal actions. However, this privilege is not absolute.
If an MP, such as "Mr. P," provides false answers before the Committee of Privileges, it could lead to serious consequences. While parliamentary privilege protects MPs from legal action for statements made within Parliament, it does not shield them from accountability for misconduct or dishonesty. The Committee of Privileges is empowered to investigate and take action against MPs for breaches of parliamentary privilege, including giving false evidence.
Possible Outcomes:
1. Internal Disciplinary Action: The Committee of Privileges can recommend disciplinary actions, such as a reprimand, suspension, or expulsion from Parliament, depending on the severity of the misconduct.
2. Legal Action: In certain cases, the Committee of Privileges can refer the matter to law enforcement if it involves criminal behavior, such as perjury, which is a criminal offense in Singapore. Perjury (lying under oath) is a serious crime and can lead to criminal charges outside the scope of parliamentary privilege.
In short, while MPs enjoy certain immunities under parliamentary privilege, this does not extend to deliberately giving false evidence before a parliamentary committee. Misconduct of this nature can lead to both internal disciplinary measures and, potentially, criminal charges.
