• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

PRC bootlickers take note: Net profile matters

Beshitted

Alfrescian
Loyal
Home > Breaking News > World > Story

Aug 22, 2009
Net profile matters
A third of employers in US have rejected job applicants after checks on networking sites

front-wofacebook22.jpg

Forty-five per cent of the employers surveyed said they use social networking sites to check on job candidates, up from just 22 per cent in a survey conducted last year. -- PHOTO: AFP


WASHINGTON - NEARLY half of US employers research the online profiles of job candidates on social networks such as Facebook, MySpace or LinkedIn, according to a new survey.

Forty-five per cent of the employers surveyed for CareerBuilder.com, the largest US online job site, said they use social networking sites to check on job candidates, up from just 22 per cent in a survey conducted last year.

Another 11 per cent said they plan to start using social networking sites for screening. 'As social networking grows increasingly pervasive, more employers are utilising these sites to screen potential employees,' CareerBuilder said in a statement.

It said job seekers should 'be mindful of the information they post online'. CareerBuilder said that of those who conduct online searches as background checks on job candidates, 29 per cent use Facebook, 26 per cent use LinkedIn and 21 per cent use MySpace.

Eleven per cent search blogs while 7 per cent follow candidates on micro-blogging service Twitter. According to the survey, 35 per cent of those polled said they have found content on a social network that caused them not to hire a candidate.

Examples included 'provocative or inappropriate photographs or information' or content about drinking or using drugs. But information found on social networking profiles was not always a negative factor in finding a job. Eighteen per cent of employers said they have found content on social networking sites that caused them to hire the candidate, according to CareerBuilder.

Some profiles 'provided a good feel for the candidate's personality' or supported their professional qualifications while others demonstrated creativity or solid communication skills.

The survey of 2,667 hiring managers and human resource professionals was conducted by Harris Interactive between May 22 and June 10. It has a sampling error of plus or minus 1.9 percentage points.

In Singapore, experts told The Straits Times that background checks on social networks are not yet part of formal recruitment processes here. But a few multinational companies, such as those from the United States, may have such a practice.

Employers are usually more concerned with a candidate's skills, attitude and knowledge, said Mr David Ang, executive director of Singapore Human Resources Institute.
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Home >

In Singapore, experts told The Straits Times that background checks on social networks are not yet part of formal recruitment processes here. But a few multinational companies, such as those from the United States, may have such a practice.
.

I found out that the american MNC which eventually hired me did check with my ex-Canadian employer & my other canadian testimonials used :eek:

So don't play, play with the "facts" that you in put into any curriculum vitae:smile:
 
Top